Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US DC: The War Against Meth
Title:US DC: The War Against Meth
Published On:2005-07-19
Source:Washington Times (DC)
Fetched On:2008-01-15 23:50:11
THE WAR AGAINST METH

Methamphetamine abuse is at epidemic proportions in the United
States.

Across America, many rural communities and small towns are plagued by
crime and indolence bred by the easy availability and widespread use
of "speed," "ice," "crystal," "glass," or simply "meth."

Trafficking and use of this illegal drug has become a
not-so-well-hidden blight in many once-idyllic towns. In small
kitchens in homes scattered at the end of back streets or the heart of
quiet neighborhoods, amateurs "cook" methamphetamine from recipes
downloaded from the Internet with chemicals bought in feed stores or
pharmacies.

While these home "meth labs" produce only a small portion of the drug
used in the U.S., they have produced much of the "buzz" about meth
because they are toxic and explosive and risk the health of small
children and neighbors.

Methamphetamine abuse and the scourge of "meth labs" are red meat for
prosecutors and legislators. As a former prosecutor, I can sympathize
with the urge to do anything and everything possible to bring a
problem like this under control. The public appreciates aggressive
attacks on problems like meth abuse, but that same public wants the
attacks to consist of something more than photo-ops or illusory solutions.

Unfortunately in the war against meth abuse, too much of the action
looks more like photo-ops and less like a real solution.

Take the state legislatures, for example. In an effort to shut down
home production of meth, more than half of the states have, in a
knee-jerk fashion, enacted restrictions on access to a chemical
(pseudo ephedrine or PSE) -- the decongestant found in common
over-the-counter (OTC) cold, flu and allergy medicines. PSE is also a
precursor chemical used by criminals to manufacture homemade meth.
Seven states have gone so far as to put products containing PSE on
Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Schedule -- not because the
products themselves are dangerous, but because a small percentage of
buyers would misuse them to make a dangerous drug.

The problem with scheduling PSE as a controlled substance is it
unfairly restricts a transaction that occurs innocently millions of
times a day at grocery stores, drug stores, convenience marts across
the country. It removes these products from every store except a
pharmacy with a licensed pharmacist. In the pharmacies, it takes them
off the shelves and puts them behind the pharmacist's counter. It
places an undue burden on mothers buying Claritin-D for their children
- -- requiring them to slink to the back of the pharmacy, find the
pharmacist, ask for the drug, show ID, sign-in, and be subject to
scrutiny. All this is required to ensure this otherwise lawful product
doesn't find its way into the hands of criminals.

This kind of police-state intrusion might be acceptable -- the way we
accept limits on personal freedoms to fight terrorism -- if it were
curtailed methamphetamine abuse.

Unfortunately, there is no compelling evidence this strategy is all
that effective. While Oklahoma claimed putting PSE on Schedule V
caused a 55 percent drop in the number of home meth lab arrests the
following year, it is just as likely the same law's no bail provisions
for suspects arrested for meth abuse, contributed to the decline. In
fact, in the Midwest alone, DEA statistics showed five states that did
not use Schedule V had even greater reductions in home lab busts than
Oklahoma -- ranging from 63 to 73 percent.

Some experts speculate recent volume increases in Mexican- and
Canadian-produced and smuggled methamphetamine are making street meth
plentiful, reducing the willingness of meth addicts to hassle with
multiple trips to the grocery store and the risks of home meth
manufacture.

The point is we can make it more difficult and costly for home meth
labs to operate without reducing law-abiding citizens' civil
liberties. And remember, this whole policy is only aimed at putting
the home labs out of business; it is not aimed at eliminating or even
reducing the overall U.S. supply of methamphetamine -- more than 80
percent of which is now smuggled over the border or produced in U.S.
super labs that acquire PSE in bulk. In fact, that source is
increasing and will do so even more if home production is curtailed.

We can make home production of meth much more difficult and less
attractive with a few simple changes restricting meth producers' and
addicts' access to PSE, without the collateral damage of a Schedule V
listing.

Many states now require that products containing PSE be placed in
special locked cases or under the watchful eye of the cashier or even
at the cashier's counter. The federal government has already placed
limits on how much PSE a consumer can buy at one time. These existing
controls could be enhanced by a requirement aimed specifically at
preventing sales to known meth offenders.

Under this approach, cashiers would determine at point of sale that
purchasers have not been convicted of offenses related to meth
production, distribution or consumption, by checking a national
registry to be established by an act of Congress. Convicted offenders
would be registered in the database and required to update their
information annually for 10 years.

Retailers would link point-of-sale transactions to the national
database and automatically run credit or bank card information against
the offender file and identify potentially risky sales.

For cash sales, retailers would request a picture ID from the
purchaser and would compare ID information to the database to
determine if a sale could be made.

Purchasers who were a match to an offender in the database would not
be permitted to purchase the product without a prescription.

This approach would avoid making innocent cold, flu or allergy
sufferers the victims and would still adequately restrict access to
PSE products to make a dent in home meth lab operations. It is
critical we succeed in shutting down home meth labs. But we can do so
without turning the whole world of over-the-counter cold medicine into
a nightmare of restrictions and bureaucracy that makes that runny
nose, sinus congestion or headache more miserable for all of us.
Member Comments
No member comments available...