MARIJUANA SHOULD BE LEGALIZED

According to a study by Harvard professor Jeffrey Miron, the
government will spend approximately $8.61 billion in 2007 on
marijuana prohibition enforcement. Despite such robust government
spending, current strategies have failed to curb marijuana
consumption. In 2005, 16.9 percent of Americans surveyed in National
Household Surveys on Drug Use and Health admitted to using marijuana
in the last year compared with 13.2 percent in 2000. Data from drug
treatment facilities indicate that marijuana abuse is also increasing.

According to a Drug and Alcohol Information System study, admission
rates to drug treatment for primary marijuana users have increased by
more than 162 percent since 1992.

Based on correspondence with University professors in the economics
department, my personal analysis of the marijuana prohibition law is
that its flawed economic policy will continue to lead to
unaccomplished initiatives. Police target sellers of marijuana
because each dealer distributes to numerous consumers.

But this policy is ignorant to economic agents: every time a drug
dealer is arrested, supply decreases and price goes up, which only
limits consumption by raising prices to consumers.

However, a study by Mert Daryal reveals marijuana, like all drugs,
has price inelastic demand, meaning that consumers are relatively
insensitive to price change - thus the billions of taxpayer dollars
spent on enforcement have minimal effect on consumption.

As an economics major and the center director for domestic issues in
the Roosevelt Institute, the University's think tank organization,
I've done some research in this field. I believe decriminalizing
marijuana will allow the United States to most effectively attack
marijuana use and abuse through education and health care.

These health care and educational programs can be funded through a
tax placed on the sale of marijuana in conjunction with reduced
enforcement costs, which I estimate to increase government revenue by
$6 to $13 billion.

I feel increased marijuana education more effectively will decrease
consumption through increasing the public's perceived risk of marijuana.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reports that
students exposed to anti-drug messages are 25 percent less likely to
use the drug, a much greater reduction than has been observed through
marijuana prohibition.

Preferences and perceived risk determine drug use, not the law. A
study by Daryal found that only 0.3 percent of the college students
he surveyed, whom had never tried marijuana, would begin to use
marijuana if it were decriminalized.

The danger with marijuana, as with alcohol, is when people use the
drug irresponsibly.

While proper education will help to eliminate some of this risk, I
feel it is important to fund programs and clinics to help cure
marijuana abusers of their addiction.

According to the National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study,
"Treatment appears to be cost effective, particularly when compared
to incarceration," meaning health care reduces marijuana abuse better
than marijuana enforcement laws can.

While most people may be willing to agree with the logic above, there
are still many people who feel that the government should not enact
policies that support drug use.

I would argue there are plenty of legal activities, such as flag
burning, which the government does not condone, but permits because
of an essential over arching value, such as the importance of free speech.

I feel the U.S. government should permit the decriminalization of
marijuana, if they truly wish to fulfill their over arching
initiative of creating a safer America by reducing marijuana use and abuse.

- - Patrick Dever is a sophomore from Atlanta majoring in economics.