News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: PUB LTE: Meth Laws Black Market Boon |
Title: | CN BC: PUB LTE: Meth Laws Black Market Boon |
Published On: | 2005-08-17 |
Source: | Castlegar News (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-15 20:13:33 |
METH LAWS BLACK MARKET BOON
Now that police and government have suffered embarrassing defeat in the war
against marijuana, they seem to be turning their focus to crystal meth. By
increasing the penalties for crystal meth, our government is trying to
appear "tough on drug dealers," and appease voters. But what they propose
simply won't work, and will, in fact, further subsidize organized crime.
As we all know by now, when you make something more illegal, you increase
it's commodity value.
We could implement the death penalty for manufacture and trafficking of
meth, and all it will do is further increase gang profits and gang
violence. These people are motivated by money, and they know that the odds
of getting caught are slim.
But unlike marijuana, you won't see happy meth users coming to the defence
of methamphetamine in public rallies or political parties.
Meth is incredibly dangerous to make, and to use. All the horror stories
about this poison are true, and no exaggeration is necessary.
That said, tougher sentences can only make things worse. Just like alcohol
prohibition in the last century, drug prohibition today is causing far more
problems than it is solving.
The answer to the meth problem is simple: regulate it. If we gave out free
meth, coke, and heroin at clinics, then street dealers would go out of
business and property crime would decrease almost immediately.
Once we steal all their customers, there will be no need for street
dealers, and no illegal supply needed. We would still bust the remaining
street dealers and suppliers, but we need to set up a safer alternative to
the black market to help the addict move away from it and move toward harm
reduction programs. These people are controlled by the drugs, and the drugs
are controlled by criminals. Wouldn't it be better to have compassionate
nurses in charge of those drugs instead.
Not even a hardcore junkie is going to go out and steal or prostitute
themselves, to get money to buy poison from some creepy street dealer who
encourages more use, when they could get clean drugs and gear for free,
from a clinic that encourages rehabilitation and harm reduction.
Sure, with this policy we'd still have addicts. But we would have fewer
addicts. It would also cost much less and be more effective than the
failing "cops, courts, and cages" system that we have now. Why can't people
see this simple logic
Russell Barth
Ottawa
Now that police and government have suffered embarrassing defeat in the war
against marijuana, they seem to be turning their focus to crystal meth. By
increasing the penalties for crystal meth, our government is trying to
appear "tough on drug dealers," and appease voters. But what they propose
simply won't work, and will, in fact, further subsidize organized crime.
As we all know by now, when you make something more illegal, you increase
it's commodity value.
We could implement the death penalty for manufacture and trafficking of
meth, and all it will do is further increase gang profits and gang
violence. These people are motivated by money, and they know that the odds
of getting caught are slim.
But unlike marijuana, you won't see happy meth users coming to the defence
of methamphetamine in public rallies or political parties.
Meth is incredibly dangerous to make, and to use. All the horror stories
about this poison are true, and no exaggeration is necessary.
That said, tougher sentences can only make things worse. Just like alcohol
prohibition in the last century, drug prohibition today is causing far more
problems than it is solving.
The answer to the meth problem is simple: regulate it. If we gave out free
meth, coke, and heroin at clinics, then street dealers would go out of
business and property crime would decrease almost immediately.
Once we steal all their customers, there will be no need for street
dealers, and no illegal supply needed. We would still bust the remaining
street dealers and suppliers, but we need to set up a safer alternative to
the black market to help the addict move away from it and move toward harm
reduction programs. These people are controlled by the drugs, and the drugs
are controlled by criminals. Wouldn't it be better to have compassionate
nurses in charge of those drugs instead.
Not even a hardcore junkie is going to go out and steal or prostitute
themselves, to get money to buy poison from some creepy street dealer who
encourages more use, when they could get clean drugs and gear for free,
from a clinic that encourages rehabilitation and harm reduction.
Sure, with this policy we'd still have addicts. But we would have fewer
addicts. It would also cost much less and be more effective than the
failing "cops, courts, and cages" system that we have now. Why can't people
see this simple logic
Russell Barth
Ottawa
Member Comments |
No member comments available...