Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: OPED: It's A Gray Area: How to Win War on Illegal Drugs
Title:US CA: OPED: It's A Gray Area: How to Win War on Illegal Drugs
Published On:2007-10-07
Source:Daily Pilot (Costa Mesa, CA)
Fetched On:2008-01-11 21:21:25
IT'S A GRAY AREA: HOW TO WIN WAR ON ILLEGAL DRUGS

In last week's column, we discussed why our policy of drug
prohibition is not working and why it will never work.

That probably was a discouraging column to read for many people. But
today's column will bring you hope, because it discusses drug
programs that work worldwide.

The first thing to do when focusing upon programs that work is to
make the same important distinctions, such as the difference between
drug crime on the one hand, and drug money crime on the other.
Similarly we must make distinctions between someone's use of drugs,
as opposed to his or her misuse, abuse or addiction to drugs. We must
also focus upon the difference between the government attempting to
hold adults accountable for their actions, instead of what they put
in their bodies.

The first thing is full, honest and open education. You show me a
problem area in our society, and I will show you how full, honest and
open education is a material part of its resolution. We should focus
honestly upon both the risks and the benefits of using various
substances. Education of this kind is working quite well with regard
to the biggest killer drug of all, tobacco, and it will work just as
effectively with other drugs.

Another program is a needle-exchange program. This program allows a
person to exchange a dirty hypodermic needle and syringe for a clean
one at a designated location -- no money changes hands, and no
questions are asked. That's it. Research studies show that programs
as such do not influence drug usage, but they do reduce the incidence
of the HIV virus that leads to AIDS as well as Hepatitis C and other
blood-born diseases by about 50%.

Regardless of what one thinks about people who inject themselves with
illicit drugs, they do not deserve to contract the AIDS virus. And if
that humane reason is not enough, consider that it costs us taxpayers
about $100,000 for each person in our country who gets AIDS.

Much hope can also be gained from a heroin maintenance program that
has been in operation in Switzerland since the middle 1990s. This is
a program run by licensed medical doctors that furnishes
prescriptions of heroin to people who are addicted to it, and the
prescriptions are filled at local pharmacies. To qualify for the
program, people must be at least 18 years old, have been addicted to
heroin for at least two years, present signs of poor health, had two
or more failed attempts at conventional treatment, and must surrender
their driver's licenses.

By the way, none of these presently illegal drugs are expensive to
grow, manufacture or supply. Marijuana is not called a "weed" for
nothing; it will grow anywhere. And the National Park Service was
growing the opium poppy used to make heroin for years at Monticello
until the DEA found out about it and ordered them removed. If the
poppies will grow in Virginia, they will grow virtually anywhere. The
only reason any of these drugs are expensive is because they are
illegal. So the cost of the heroin in this program is no more than
$10 per day for even the heaviest-using drug addict.

The results of the heroin-maintenance program show a 60% drop in
felonies by the patients and an 82% drop in patients selling heroin.
No one has died from a heroin overdose, and new infections of AIDS
and hepatitis have been reduced. In addition, heroin usage in the
communities has also been materially reduced. Most new users are
introduced to it by their social groups, and 50 percent of the users
sell heroin to support their own habits. But with so many
users/sellers in the medical program, non-users have fewer chances to
be exposed.

This medicalization program also made heroin unattractive to young
people. As a result of this success, Switzerland's heroin program is
being replicated in Germany, Holland, Belgium, England, Spain and Canada.

Another program that works is treatment. The RAND Corporation
published study results in 1994 that said taxpayers get seven times
more value for tax dollars with drug treatment than they do for incarceration.

This shows that it is much more effective to provide treatment for a
nonviolent drug-addict, which costs about $3,500 per year, than to
incarcerate that person at the cost to the taxpayers of about $25,000 per year.

For those people who are in prison, drug treatment has also been
shown to bring truly positive results. For example, in Donovan State
Prison in northern San Diego County, drug-addicted people who receive
treatment as well as a program of aftercare support have a recidivism
or re-offender rate of about 18% within the first year after being
released from prison. But similar groups of drug addicts who do not
receive the treatment program and an aftercare component have a
recidivism rate of about 80% within the same period of time!

So think of all of the crimes not committed, victims not victimized,
police not having to investigate and prosecutors, defense attorneys,
judges and juries not having to try criminal cases -- as well as the
prison space that is freed up -- all as a result of the treatment
program at Donovan.
Member Comments
No member comments available...