WHAT CAN BE DONE WITH HARDCORE REPEAT OFFENDERS

The Interior town of Williams Lake has done a good job of
highlighting the problem of "prolific offenders" in recent weeks.
Instead of playing down its distinction as B.C.'s crime capital as
previous honourees Surrey, New Westminster and North Vancouver have
done before, Williams Lake Mayor Scott Nelson has used police
statistics to tackle the problem head on.

He's put the message out forcefully that the numbers are driven by a
handful of hardcore repeat offenders who, especially in a small town,
can generate a crime wave all by themselves. But the same story could
be told in communities around the province, and it's usually a story
about what people will do to get drugs.

In Williams Lake and elsewhere they're demanding that repeat
offenders be kept in custody until they are sentenced, so at least
they can't rack up new crimes while awaiting trial. While that's an
appealing idea, B.C. Solicitor General John Les reminds me of its major flaw.

Career criminals (and their lawyers) prefer to maximize time "in
remand" awaiting trial, especially if the evidence against them is a
slam dunk. In a time-honoured (and naive) tradition, judges kindly
give them two-for-one credit for time served while they are still
technically innocent.

Holding suspects creates another problem for the B.C. correctional
system, which runs addiction programs for inmates.

"The reality is they spend more time there in remand than actually
sentenced, and when they're there on remand, there's not much we can
do with them, because there's the whole presumption of innocence
thing," Les told me. "You can't impose anything on them. And then
when they're sentenced, typically they don't spend a whole lot of
time there anyway."

Another popular notion is that the threat of harsh sentences will
deter the kind of impulsive property crime that plagues communities.
But does it really? One sobering study done in 1992 examined the most
direct of consequences, delivered by Irish Republican Army enforcers
to juvenile car thieves in Northern Ireland: "kneecapping," or
shooting the thief in the leg with a handgun. Did this reduce the
number of car thefts? No. Other studies suggest that 80 per cent of
car thieves believe they will never be caught, and that in the U.S.,
only about 14 per cent are caught.

For those desperate for drugs, fear of consequences seems an even
more remote notion.

Les has high hopes for B.C.'s community court pilot project, due to
open next spring in Vancouver. Its goal is to deal with offenders
quickly, giving them one shot at serving a sentence in a treatment
program before going into the regular system.

Les says the big city is the logical place to start, since it has the
most treatment programs available, but smaller towns can benefit too,
and Williams Lake has already begun talks with police and community agencies.

Last week the federal government launched its latest anti-drug
strategy, amid much squawking in the big-city media about a
U.S.-style war on drugs, and the allegedly urgent need for more
defeatist pest-holes along the lines of Vancouver's unsafe injection site.

About half of the Stephen Harper government's $64 million anti-drug
strategy is supposed to be directed to treatment programs. Given the
Conservatives' ideological rigidity, that probably means
abstinence-based programs, which by happy coincidence are the only
ones that actually work.

Those bait cars

The studies mentioned above are cited in an excellent website run by
a group of U.S. professors, called the Center for Problem-Oriented
Policing (www.popcenter.org).

Among the illustrations on the site is a frame from B.C.'s notorious
'bait car boy' video. You may have seen it: the meth-addicted serial
car thief screaming "Oncoming!" as he runs red lights at top speed in
his latest ride, while trying unsuccessfully to fire a big handgun
out the window.

Yet here's what the academics say about bait cars or "gotcha cars" as
they are sometimes known: "Their use greatly appeals to the police
and the public.. They must be kept under constant surveillance, and
it is unclear whether they yield more arrests than surveillance alone."