Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - Canada: Column: Drugs? Not Here!
Title:Canada: Column: Drugs? Not Here!
Published On:2005-09-29
Source:Globe and Mail (Canada)
Fetched On:2008-01-15 12:14:06
DRUGS? NOT HERE!

I, like everyone else in the media and fashion world, am shocked,
shocked, at the recent allegations that supermodel Kate Moss is a
consumer of cocaine. I am stunned and disappointed. I -- and again I
am sure I speak for all my media colleagues here -- would never have
thought such a successful person, in such an elegant business, would
stoop to such a disgusting habit. I eagerly concur with the British
fashion maven on Fashion Television who said very sternly and
convincingly, "It's not cool, it's not stylish, it's not nice."
Exactly -- certainly not stylish.

No sir. I am impressed that she even knows about this mysterious drug
at all, as I don't know where she would have ever seen any evidence
of its use in the worlds of fashion or media.

I am similarly shocked, shocked, to hear that the front-runner in the
PQ leadership race Andre Boisclair occasionally took cocaine while a
cabinet minister in the late 1990s. I cannot imagine why a nice,
good-looking, successful, young gay man would ever turn to illegal drugs.

Nor do I know of any other young gay men who do drugs; it is
completely unheard of in that community. This is why I, like all the
writers and editors who have written on this subject, am so adamant
that his competence must be questioned, for anyone who takes drugs,
even socially, while holding any important position, must be
incompetent. Newspaper editors especially know and understand this,
and editorialists must all agree that any one of them who has used
illegal drugs while holding a newspaper or magazine job, even at any
time in the past, should be disqualified from holding that position.

Luckily we have nothing to worry about there.

What we do have to worry about, though, apparently -- and this I am
shocked about too, let me tell you, shocked and appalled -- is the
recent news about teenagers having oral sex. As other columnists have
pointed out, recent surveys have shown that 55 per cent of Americans
between the ages of 15 and 19 have had oral sex. The news gets worse:
70 per cent of U.S. 18 and 19 year olds have had oral sex. Well, I am
just flabbergasted by this, because of course I never had oral sex as
a teenager, as I'm sure my colleagues didn't either.

This complete abstinence is what allows us our outrage.

I share my colleague Margaret Wente's sense of horror and disbelief
at the news that 11 per cent of American teenage girls have had "some
kind of sexual experience" with a female partner.

Another woman, yes, you heard correctly: It's actual homosexual
behaviour we're talking about here, and no one is doing one goddamn
thing about it! I don't know where young girls get these ideas (and
I'm pretty sure no boys would indulge in such things at a young age),
but it's pretty clear that it's only due to peer pressure and, well,
simple moral collapse.

I didn't quite understand one thing Ms. Wente wrote, though.

She described fellatio as an "unspeakably private act." I'm not sure
in what sense she meant unspeakable: unspeakable as in horrible or
egregious, or unspeakable as in we can't speak about it? In either
case, I'm not sure I . . . well, never mind; I don't mean to suggest
that I'm in favour of it. I can't imagine any 19 year old would
actually want to participate in such an act, private or, well not
private, such as on the Internet or something.

Let's not speak of it. (Just to be clear: I myself would never think
about oral sex with a 19 year old, and I assure you I am definitely
not thinking about it right now.) Because I, as a media person, must
distance myself from actual life in order to report it objectively.
My own experiences must have nothing to do with my judgment or
condemnation of others.

And it doesn't hurt if I'm aware, at the same time, that public
opinion on matters of private behaviour is rather conservative in
this country, and it's rather dangerous to go around talking honestly
about one's actual experience with such things as sex and drugs.

It's probably a much safer bet to repeat the social truths which we
all hold to be self-evident.

And no, as a journalist, I am certainly not thinking in graphic
images, as you might be, about those teen girl-on-girl experiences
the statistics have so shockingly revealed.

I am dispassionate about such things, merely curious as a cultural analyst.

We are a different breed over here: We are objective.
Member Comments
No member comments available...