Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US: FBI May Relax Hiring Guidelines
Title:US: FBI May Relax Hiring Guidelines
Published On:2005-10-10
Source:Peoria Journal Star (IL)
Fetched On:2008-01-15 11:23:55
FBI MAY RELAX HIRING GUIDELINES

Changes Would Ease Limits On Past Drug Use For Applicants

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The FBI, famous for its straight-laced
crime-fighting image, is considering whether to relax its hiring
rules over how often applicants could have used marijuana or other
illegal drugs earlier in life.

Some senior FBI managers have been deeply frustrated that they could
not hire applicants who acknowledged occasional marijuana use in
college, but in some cases already perform top-secret work at other
government agencies, such as the CIA or State Department.

FBI Director Robert Mueller will make the final decision. "We can't say

when or if this is going to happen, but we are exploring the
possibility," spokesman Stephen Kodak said

The change would ease limits about how often - and how many years ago
- - applicants for jobs such as intelligence analysts, linguists,
computer specialists, accountants and others had used illegal drugs.

The rules, however, would not be relaxed for FBI special agents, the
fabled "G-men" who conduct most criminal and terrorism
investigations. Also, the new plan would continue to ban current drug use.

The nation's former anti-drug czar said he understands the FBI's dilemma.

"The integrity of the FBI is a known national treasure that must be
protected," said retired Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, who used to head
the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. "But there
should be no hard and fast rule that suggests you can't ever have
used drugs. As long as it's clear that's behind you and you're
overwhelmingly likely to remain drug free, you should be eligible."

Current rules prohibit the FBI from hiring anyone who used marijuana
within the past three years or more than 15 times ever. They also ban
anyone who used other illegal drugs, such as cocaine or heroin,
within the past 10 years or more than five times.

"That 16th time is a killer," McCaffrey said.

The new FBI proposal would judge applicants based on their "whole
person" rather than limiting drug-related experiences to an arbitrary
number. It would consider the circumstances of a person's previous
drug use, such as their age, and the likelihood of future usage. The
relaxed standard already is in use at most other U.S. intelligence agencies.

Entry-level intelligence analysts usually earn between $36,000 and
$53,000, depending on qualifications and where they are assigned to
work. Entry-level FBI special agents earn $42,548.

The FBI proposal contrasts with the agency's starched image and its
drug-fighting history. A generation of video game players can
remember seeing the FBI seal and slogan, "Winners don't use drugs,"
attributed to former FBI Director William Sessions, on popular arcade
games from the late 1980s.

Private companies have wrestled with the same problem. Employers
complain they can't afford to turn away applicants because of
marijuana use that ended years earlier, said Robert Drusendahl, owner
of The Pre-Check Co. in Cleveland, which performs background
employment checks for private companies.

"The point is, they can't fill those spots," Drusendahl said. "This
is a microcosm of what's happening outside in the rest of the world.
Do we dilute our standards?" He said the FBI should have a low
tolerance for any illegal behavior by applicants. "If they used
marijuana, that's illegal. It's pretty cut and dried."

A recently retired FBI polygraph examiner, Harold L. Byford of El
Paso, Texas, was quoted in a federal lawsuit in February 2002 arguing
that "if someone has smoked marijuana 15 times, he's done it 50
times. . . . If I was running the show there would be no one in the
FBI that ever used illegal drugs!"

The proposed FBI change also reflects cultural and generational
shifts in attitudes toward marijuana and other drugs, even as the
Bush administration has sought to establish links between terrorists
and narcotics.

"I don't think you could find anybody who hasn't tried marijuana, and
I take a lot of credit for that," said Tommy Chong, the comedian
whose films with Cheech Marin provided over-the-top portrayals of
marijuana culture during the 1980s. "They're going to have to change
their policy."

While marijuana use is hardly universal, it remains the most commonly
used illegal drug in the United States, with about half of teenagers
trying the drug before they graduate high school.

"What people did when they were 18 or 21, I think that is pretty
irrelevant," said Richard Clarke, a former top White House
counterterrorism adviser. "We have to recognize there are a couple of
generations now who regarded marijuana use, while it's technically
illegal, as nothing more serious than jaywalking."

An agency's attitude toward drug use has been blamed for unexpected
consequences. The CIA forced one of its officers, Edward Lee Howard,
to resign in May 1983 after he failed a polygraph test and disclosed
his drug use in Colombia during 1975 when he was a Peace Corps
volunteer. Howard defected to the Soviet Union in 1985 after he was
accused of espionage activities that spy hunters believe were driven
by resentment over his forced resignation.

"I had been totally honest about each and every misdeed in my past,
including my drug use in South America and my occasional abuse of
alcohol," Howard wrote in his 1995 memoirs. He died in July 2002 at
his home outside Moscow.

Some other federal agencies also have tough marijuana policies. The
Drug Enforcement Administration will not hire applicants as agents
who used illegal drugs, although it makes exceptions for admitting
"limited youthful and experimental use of marijuana." The DEA,
however, permits no prior use of harder drugs.

"Recreational marijuana use is a fact of life nowadays," said Mark
Zaid, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who has represented people rejected
for FBI jobs over drugs. "It doesn't stop Supreme Court justices from
getting on the bench and doesn't stop presidents from getting
elected, so why should it stop someone from getting hired by the FBI?"
Member Comments
No member comments available...