THIS IS YOUR CRIME PROBLEM ON DRUGS

The Interior town of Williams Lake has done a good job of
highlighting the problem of "prolific offenders" in recent weeks.
Instead of playing down its distinction as B.C.'s crime capital as
previous honourees Surrey, New Westminster and North Vancouver have
done before, Williams Lake Mayor Scott Nelson has used police
statistics to tackle the problem head-on. He's put the message out
forcefully that the numbers are driven by a handful of hardcore
repeat offenders who, especially in a small town, can generate a
crime wave all by themselves. But the same story could be told in
communities around the province, and it's usually a story about what
people will do to get drugs. In Williams Lake and elsewhere they're
demanding that repeat offenders be kept in custody until they are
sentenced, so at least they can't rack up new crimes while awaiting
trial. While that's an appealing idea, B.C. Solicitor General John
Les reminds me of its major flaw.

Career criminals (and their lawyers) prefer to maximize time "in
remand" awaiting trial, especially if the evidence against them is a
slam dunk. In a time-honoured (and naive) tradition, judges kindly
give them two-for-one credit for time served while they are still
technically innocent. Holding suspects creates another problem for
the B.C. correctional system, which runs addiction programs for inmates.

"The reality is they spend more time there in remand than actually
sentenced, and when they're there on remand, there's not much we can
do with them, because there's the whole presumption of innocence
thing," Les told me. "You can't impose anything on them. And then
when they're sentenced, typically they don't spend a whole lot of
time there anyway."

Another popular notion is that the threat of harsh sentences will
deter the kind of impulsive property crime that plagues communities.
But does it really? One sobering study done in 1992 examined the most
direct of consequences, delivered by Irish Republican Army enforcers
to juvenile car thieves in Northern Ireland: "kneecapping," or
shooting the thief in the leg with a handgun. Did this reduce the
number of car thefts? No. Other studies suggest that 80 per cent of
car thieves believe they will never be caught, and that in the U.S.,
only about 14 per cent are caught.

For those desperate for drugs, fear of consequences seems an even
more remote notion. That's why today authorities are looking toward
the community court or "drug court" model for solutions.

Les has high hopes for B.C.'s community court pilot project, due to
open next spring in Vancouver. Its goal is to deal with offenders
quickly, giving them one shot at serving a sentence in a treatment
program before going into the regular system.

Les says the big city is the logical place to start, since it has the
most treatment programs available, but smaller towns can benefit too,
and Williams Lake has already begun talks with police and community
agencies. Last week the federal government launched its latest
anti-drug strategy, amid much squawking in the big-city media about a
U.S.-style war on drugs, and the allegedly urgent need for more
defeatist pest-holes along the lines of Vancouver's unsafe injection site.

About half of the Stephen Harper government's $64 million anti-drug
strategy is supposed to be directed to treatment programs. Given the
Conservatives' ideological rigidity, that probably means
abstinence-based programs, which by happy coincidence are the only
ones that actually work. How will repeat offenders be made to stick
to programs, and how will the public be kept safe? Les says he'll
have more to say on that in a few weeks.