News (Media Awareness Project) - US WA: Racial Gap in Pot Prosecutions, Report Finds |
Title: | US WA: Racial Gap in Pot Prosecutions, Report Finds |
Published On: | 2008-01-08 |
Source: | Seattle Times (WA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-11 15:31:42 |
RACIAL GAP IN POT PROSECUTIONS, REPORT FINDS
Since Seattle voters reduced pot possession to the lowest
law-enforcement priority, marijuana cases and prosecutions have
fallen, according to a report released Monday by a review panel.
Despite the overall decrease, the report showed a racial gap that
some panel members called concerning. Since Initiative 75 took effect
in fall 2003, the number of cases involving black men has exceeded
cases involving white men.
"It's shocking," D'Adre Cunningham said about the numbers at a
Seattle City Council meeting Monday. Cunningham served on the
11-member, City Council-appointed panel and is an attorney at The
Defender Association. "They obviously show some issues of concern."
Supporters hoped the initiative would reduce the number of cases in
which marijuana was the primary reason for a police officer to make
contact with a suspect. According to Washington state law, possession
of up to 40 grams of marijuana is a misdemeanor that carries a
minimum sentence of one day in jail and a $250 fine.
The marijuana policy-review panel's final report showed that the
number of marijuana cases the Seattle Police Department referred to
the Seattle city attorney's office fell from 332 in 2000 to 148 in
2006. The attorney's office also brought charges in fewer cases, from
184 in 2000 to 125 in 2006.
Dominic Holden, a panel member and one of the 2003 leaders of the
campaign to pass the initiative, said the report "shows I-75 works
exactly as promised to voters. It saved law-enforcement resources to
focus on other more serious crimes." The report estimated that the
city spent $66,190 less on marijuana cases from 2003 to 2004. The
city also spent $25,828 on the panel's four-year work.
The panel concluded that there was no increase in marijuana usage
among young people, no increase in crime and no adverse impact on
public health.
Despite the overall drop in cases, cases brought against black men
went up, both in number and in proportion to the population. The
disparity existed before the initiative's passage but has since widened.
"There are more black men being arrested and prosecuted for personal
use of marijuana than adult white men," said Alison Chinn Holcomb, a
panel member and director of the Marijuana Education Project for ACLU
(American Civil Liberties Union) Washington.
City Attorney Tom Carr emphasized that the number of marijuana cases
is small and difficult to draw conclusions from, compared with the
roughly 20,000 cases his office handles each year.
"They're really small unless it's you," Councilmember Richard McIver
said at the meeting.
Carr and Capt. Mike Meehan, head of the Police Department's narcotics
section, both were on the panel and recommended the council repeal
the law, which they have always opposed.
"Instructing your public agency to pay less attention to crime is not
good policy," Carr said.
Meehan said the cases have gone down because officers know the law changed.
"While the number of cases did decline, I cannot say it was solely
because of the initiative," he said, and the racial disparity in the
report does not mean there's a bias in law enforcement.
His primary concern is how youth are reacting. "I don't want to send
a message to kids that drug use is OK," he said.
Councilmember Tom Rasmussen, who also was on the panel, said he wants
to continue to collect data on both cases and public-health issues,
but he does not support changing the law.
Since Seattle voters reduced pot possession to the lowest
law-enforcement priority, marijuana cases and prosecutions have
fallen, according to a report released Monday by a review panel.
Despite the overall decrease, the report showed a racial gap that
some panel members called concerning. Since Initiative 75 took effect
in fall 2003, the number of cases involving black men has exceeded
cases involving white men.
"It's shocking," D'Adre Cunningham said about the numbers at a
Seattle City Council meeting Monday. Cunningham served on the
11-member, City Council-appointed panel and is an attorney at The
Defender Association. "They obviously show some issues of concern."
Supporters hoped the initiative would reduce the number of cases in
which marijuana was the primary reason for a police officer to make
contact with a suspect. According to Washington state law, possession
of up to 40 grams of marijuana is a misdemeanor that carries a
minimum sentence of one day in jail and a $250 fine.
The marijuana policy-review panel's final report showed that the
number of marijuana cases the Seattle Police Department referred to
the Seattle city attorney's office fell from 332 in 2000 to 148 in
2006. The attorney's office also brought charges in fewer cases, from
184 in 2000 to 125 in 2006.
Dominic Holden, a panel member and one of the 2003 leaders of the
campaign to pass the initiative, said the report "shows I-75 works
exactly as promised to voters. It saved law-enforcement resources to
focus on other more serious crimes." The report estimated that the
city spent $66,190 less on marijuana cases from 2003 to 2004. The
city also spent $25,828 on the panel's four-year work.
The panel concluded that there was no increase in marijuana usage
among young people, no increase in crime and no adverse impact on
public health.
Despite the overall drop in cases, cases brought against black men
went up, both in number and in proportion to the population. The
disparity existed before the initiative's passage but has since widened.
"There are more black men being arrested and prosecuted for personal
use of marijuana than adult white men," said Alison Chinn Holcomb, a
panel member and director of the Marijuana Education Project for ACLU
(American Civil Liberties Union) Washington.
City Attorney Tom Carr emphasized that the number of marijuana cases
is small and difficult to draw conclusions from, compared with the
roughly 20,000 cases his office handles each year.
"They're really small unless it's you," Councilmember Richard McIver
said at the meeting.
Carr and Capt. Mike Meehan, head of the Police Department's narcotics
section, both were on the panel and recommended the council repeal
the law, which they have always opposed.
"Instructing your public agency to pay less attention to crime is not
good policy," Carr said.
Meehan said the cases have gone down because officers know the law changed.
"While the number of cases did decline, I cannot say it was solely
because of the initiative," he said, and the racial disparity in the
report does not mean there's a bias in law enforcement.
His primary concern is how youth are reacting. "I don't want to send
a message to kids that drug use is OK," he said.
Councilmember Tom Rasmussen, who also was on the panel, said he wants
to continue to collect data on both cases and public-health issues,
but he does not support changing the law.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...