News (Media Awareness Project) - US IA: Edu: Editorial: Pulkrabek's Sensible Penalty Plan |
Title: | US IA: Edu: Editorial: Pulkrabek's Sensible Penalty Plan |
Published On: | 2006-02-10 |
Source: | Daily Iowan, The (IA Edu) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-14 17:15:08 |
PULKRABEK'S SENSIBLE PENALTY PLAN
Johnson County Sheriff Lonny Pulkrabek deserves more support than he
is likely to receive for his recent appearance before the Iowa
Legislature. At a time when legislators are considering still-tougher
penalties for marijuana possession, Pulkrabek presented a more
nuanced - and sensible - approach to alcohol and drug policy.
His stand shows a responsible dedication to policies that are both
fair and practically feasible, and it is to legislators' discredit
that they seem disinclined to listen.
Pulkrabek made seven recommendations to the Legislature on Wednesday,
two of which have grabbed particular attention.
Instead of facing a $145 fine and jail time, publicly drunk
individuals not causing harm would be taken to a detox center
overnight, and they would be issed a warning in the morning.
Currently, a first public-intoxication conviction results in the
aforementioned penalties.
Similarly, possession of small amounts of marijuana would result in
less-severe penalties under Pulkrabek's proposal.
Currently, first-offense possession of any amount of marijuana can be
punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
Iowa City police arrested 424 students for public intoxication during
the 2004-05 school year. It is impossible to tell how many of those
were being violent or causing damage, but such offenses would be
covered by other statutes, anyway.
If they wanted, officers could make 1,000 public-intoxication arrests
every weekend, given the prevalence of public drunkenness downtown.
Imposing harsh penalties after largely arbitrary arrests is ridiculous.
Pulkrabek's stance on marijuana should be equally applauded.
Marijuana possession arrests can cause severe damage to a students'
life. Financial aid can be stripped, and a serious misdemeanor on a
criminal record can cause immense difficulties in future career
searches. Given the relative nature of the substances, possession of
small amounts of marijuana is not inherently worthy of a harsher
penalty than underage possession of a comparable amount of alcohol.
There is also little wisdom in detaining hundreds of college students
for minor infractions, because of budget constraints and overcrowded
jails. Police officers have more pressing issues at hand than
arresting random drunks and worrying about tiny amounts of marijuana.
Currently, Johnson County ships approximately 10 inmates per day to
the Linn County Correctional Facility, at a daily cost of $65 per
head. County officials are considering building a new jail, and one
is badly needed.
Pulkrabek's ideas, however, would ease the problem considerably.
UI students will invariably engage in activities that violate the
law, and it is right that laws be enforced.
However, authorities must use discretion in their enforcement
procedures. Handing out overly harsh penalties for relatively common
incidents is absolutely pointless. Pulkrabek's statement that
"students come here to get educated, but a large percentage leave
with a degree and a criminal record" is entirely correct and shows a
proper willingness to review unfair penalties for behavior that, for
better or worse, is not atypical for collegians here or elsewhere in
the country - a pragmatic wisdom that should be encouraged.
Johnson County Sheriff Lonny Pulkrabek deserves more support than he
is likely to receive for his recent appearance before the Iowa
Legislature. At a time when legislators are considering still-tougher
penalties for marijuana possession, Pulkrabek presented a more
nuanced - and sensible - approach to alcohol and drug policy.
His stand shows a responsible dedication to policies that are both
fair and practically feasible, and it is to legislators' discredit
that they seem disinclined to listen.
Pulkrabek made seven recommendations to the Legislature on Wednesday,
two of which have grabbed particular attention.
Instead of facing a $145 fine and jail time, publicly drunk
individuals not causing harm would be taken to a detox center
overnight, and they would be issed a warning in the morning.
Currently, a first public-intoxication conviction results in the
aforementioned penalties.
Similarly, possession of small amounts of marijuana would result in
less-severe penalties under Pulkrabek's proposal.
Currently, first-offense possession of any amount of marijuana can be
punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
Iowa City police arrested 424 students for public intoxication during
the 2004-05 school year. It is impossible to tell how many of those
were being violent or causing damage, but such offenses would be
covered by other statutes, anyway.
If they wanted, officers could make 1,000 public-intoxication arrests
every weekend, given the prevalence of public drunkenness downtown.
Imposing harsh penalties after largely arbitrary arrests is ridiculous.
Pulkrabek's stance on marijuana should be equally applauded.
Marijuana possession arrests can cause severe damage to a students'
life. Financial aid can be stripped, and a serious misdemeanor on a
criminal record can cause immense difficulties in future career
searches. Given the relative nature of the substances, possession of
small amounts of marijuana is not inherently worthy of a harsher
penalty than underage possession of a comparable amount of alcohol.
There is also little wisdom in detaining hundreds of college students
for minor infractions, because of budget constraints and overcrowded
jails. Police officers have more pressing issues at hand than
arresting random drunks and worrying about tiny amounts of marijuana.
Currently, Johnson County ships approximately 10 inmates per day to
the Linn County Correctional Facility, at a daily cost of $65 per
head. County officials are considering building a new jail, and one
is badly needed.
Pulkrabek's ideas, however, would ease the problem considerably.
UI students will invariably engage in activities that violate the
law, and it is right that laws be enforced.
However, authorities must use discretion in their enforcement
procedures. Handing out overly harsh penalties for relatively common
incidents is absolutely pointless. Pulkrabek's statement that
"students come here to get educated, but a large percentage leave
with a degree and a criminal record" is entirely correct and shows a
proper willingness to review unfair penalties for behavior that, for
better or worse, is not atypical for collegians here or elsewhere in
the country - a pragmatic wisdom that should be encouraged.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...