MEDICAL POT BILL DIES, AND WITH IT CHANCE TO EASE PEOPLE'S PAIN

Dear Editor: Wisconsin Assembly Bill 740 regarding the medical use of
marijuana - born Oct. 11, 2005; died March 9, 2006.

On Thursday, AB 740, relating to the medical use of marijuana, died in
committee from legislative neglect after a short life of only 150
days. AB 740 was preceded in death by the 2003-04 session's AB 892,
the 2001-02 session's AB 715 and the 1997-98 session's AB 560.

In those 150 days, an estimated 10,825 Wisconsinites were diagnosed
with cancer, and 4,496 families lost a loved one to the disease.
Others faced multiple sclerosis, AIDS, glaucoma, chronic pain and
other serious illness. But rather than addressing this urgent need of
allowing the use of medical marijuana for these patients, which most
people support, our dysfunctional Legislature instead focused on
issues that divide us.

And while AB 740 was a bipartisan bill sponsored by a Republican, Rep.
Gregg Underheim, its death was also a bipartisan effort.

At a November public hearing, some Republicans scorned the bill and
were hostile to supporters. Other members, like Rep. Tom Nelson,
D-Kaukauna, helped kill it by omission, by refusing to take a position
and scuttling an expected vote by the committee. It seemed as if only
the committees' two physicians, Democratic Reps. Chuck Benedict and
Sheldon Wassermann, truly got it, but their colleagues apparently
never asked their opinion.

While a vote in committee was never assured, patients who traveled
long distances in pain to publicly share private, highly personal
information certainly expected one. However, that decision was left up
to an out-of-state lobby group. According to a statement from Rep.
Underheim's office, the group felt a loss in committee here might
negatively affect pending legislation they supported in Minnesota and
Illinois. The Minnesota bill lost in committee last Thursday. The fate
of the Illinois bill is still pending as I write.

Underheim was certainly free to make whatever decision he felt was
proper. However, in the end, patients were not protected, incumbents
unwilling to go on record in an election year were protected, and
politics again trumped both compassion and science. To Wisconsin
patients, it feels like one step forward and three steps back.

Gary Storck

Madison