Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US OR: Oregon Appeals Court Rules On Drug Charges
Title:US OR: Oregon Appeals Court Rules On Drug Charges
Published On:2006-03-16
Source:News-Review, The (Roseburg, OR)
Fetched On:2008-01-14 14:15:13
OREGON APPEALS COURT RULES ON DRUG CHARGES

The Oregon Court of Appeals last week overturned one Douglas County
drug conviction and upheld another.

In the first case, the court ruled that officers from the Roseburg
Police Department improperly searched a backpack found on the front
seat of a pickup without first obtaining a warrant. The backpack
contained marijuana that was allegedly being sold by the suspect.

In the second case, the court ruled that a defendant failed to
timely file a motion to dismiss charges on the grounds of double
jeopardy. The state retried the defendant after a jury failed to
muster enough votes to either convict or acquit.

When the case was tried a second time, the defense waited too late
to raise the issue of double jeopardy, the court ruled.

In the marijuana case, Officer Todd Crouse of the RPD was on patrol
in October 2002 when he spotted a man in a pickup parked in downtown
Roseburg. The man, who was wearing a distinctive camouflage hat, and
the pickup matched the description of a purported drug dealer
supplied by a confidential informant.

Crouse watched Glide resident Daren W. Newport appear to pass
something to a passenger in the pickup. While Crouse could not see
what was being exchanged because the men's hands were blocked from
view, he could tell they were trading something.

Crouse, who had only been on the job about 18 months, called for
assistance from Officer Todd Koberstein, who had extensive training
and experience in drug cases. He confirmed the informant who had
supplied Crouse with the information was a drug user whose tips had
proved reliable.

By the time Koberstein reached the scene, Newport had gone inside
the nearby Wild Rose Lounge. The officers entered the tavern and
asked Newport to talk with them outside. Koberstein told Newport
they suspected him of drug activity and asked him for consent to
search his person.

Newport agreed and the officers found $2,038 in cash, along with a
small notebook that included notations that appeared to list drug
transactions. Koberstein then asked Newport if they could search the
backpack on the seat of the pickup, but Newport refused.
The officer searched the backpack anyway, finding marijuana.

The appeals court concluded that police had probable cause that the
backpack might contain evidence of drug-related crimes. However,
because Newport was contacted inside the tavern and the backpack had
been left in the pickup, it did not give officers the right to
search the backpack without a warrant.

Douglas County Circuit Judge William Lasswell had allowed the
evidence found in the backpack to be introduced at trial. Newport
was convicted of possession, manufacture and delivery of a
controlled substance.

The Court of Appeals overturned the conviction and sent the case
back to Circuit Court.

In the second case, Karen S. McClendon was convicted of possession,
manufacture and delivery of a controlled substance. She challenged
her conviction of the latter two charges on double jeopardy grounds.

McClendon was arrested in April 2002 and found guilty by a jury of
the possession charge. On the other charges, the jury voted 7-5, but
lacked the votes to convict. Although the jury was dismissed,
neither party asked for a mistrial based on the jury's failure
to either convict or acquit McClendon.

Prosecutors retried the defendant on the possession and delivery
charges. Although McClendon objected to being tried again, her
attorney didn't file a timely motion questioning the action until
all the evidence in the case had been presented.

Under Oregon law, a motion to set aside an indictment must be made
at the time of arraignment or within 10 days. McClendon did not do
that, nor argue that cause existed for needing additional time.

As a result, the appeals court rejected her claim.
Member Comments
No member comments available...