News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: PUB LTE: Regulation And Education Better Than |
Title: | CN BC: PUB LTE: Regulation And Education Better Than |
Published On: | 2006-03-28 |
Source: | Similkameen News Leader (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-14 13:18:45 |
REGULATION AND EDUCATION BETTER THAN PROHIBITION
RE: Police, Prohibition, And Violence When it comes to drug abuse,
health care professionals and social workers usually advocate medical
treatment and therapy.
Many high ranking police and government officials, however, still
insist that the best way to prevent drug use - and to win 'The War On
Drugs' - is to put more people in jail, and for longer periods of
time. They are advocating an extremely violent punishment for a
non-violent crime.
They are also 'sending a message' to the the rest of us, which is
that they are in charge, and are willing to do any one of us terrible
physical harm for the smallest infraction. There is no good reason to
take policy advice from someone with such monstrous opinions.
My understanding is that jail is a dirty, violent place where one
comes into contact with deadly diseases, sexual predators, and hard
drugs. The terrible psychological effects alone are enough to badly
damage most people permanently.
This could be the reason why some judges are giving light sentences
for marijuana crimes. They are sensible enough to realize that
sending someone into a potentially deadly environment for something
that is essentially a 'consumer choice,' is much like saying that it
is okay to beat your teenager half to death for sneaking into the
liquor cabinet.
Not only does imprisonment serve as an unnecessary short-term
financial burden to society, it will probably cause more long-term
harm to the prisoner than good, along with a greater cost to taxpayers.
This could also be the reason why the law is no deterrent. Deep down
- - whether they admit it or not - everyone knows that prohibition is
not only an unsound policy, it is completely absurd. We don't need
the government and police to act as a 'stern father,' and all science
and history indicate that when it comes to recreational substances,
regulation and education work better than prohibition.
It is very frightening to think that our police officers - who get
their salaries from the taxpayers and are supposed to protect and
serve - would like to see someone go to a horribly violent place,
simply for possessing marijuana, or growing some in their home.
Keeping the population obedient to the state under the threat of
violence or death is akin to terrorism, in my view.
There is one group of law-enforcement officials that has a different
view, however. They are called Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
(LEAP) and they can be found at http://www.leap.cc/
- - Russell Barth
Federal Medical Marijuana License Holder, Ottawa
RE: Police, Prohibition, And Violence When it comes to drug abuse,
health care professionals and social workers usually advocate medical
treatment and therapy.
Many high ranking police and government officials, however, still
insist that the best way to prevent drug use - and to win 'The War On
Drugs' - is to put more people in jail, and for longer periods of
time. They are advocating an extremely violent punishment for a
non-violent crime.
They are also 'sending a message' to the the rest of us, which is
that they are in charge, and are willing to do any one of us terrible
physical harm for the smallest infraction. There is no good reason to
take policy advice from someone with such monstrous opinions.
My understanding is that jail is a dirty, violent place where one
comes into contact with deadly diseases, sexual predators, and hard
drugs. The terrible psychological effects alone are enough to badly
damage most people permanently.
This could be the reason why some judges are giving light sentences
for marijuana crimes. They are sensible enough to realize that
sending someone into a potentially deadly environment for something
that is essentially a 'consumer choice,' is much like saying that it
is okay to beat your teenager half to death for sneaking into the
liquor cabinet.
Not only does imprisonment serve as an unnecessary short-term
financial burden to society, it will probably cause more long-term
harm to the prisoner than good, along with a greater cost to taxpayers.
This could also be the reason why the law is no deterrent. Deep down
- - whether they admit it or not - everyone knows that prohibition is
not only an unsound policy, it is completely absurd. We don't need
the government and police to act as a 'stern father,' and all science
and history indicate that when it comes to recreational substances,
regulation and education work better than prohibition.
It is very frightening to think that our police officers - who get
their salaries from the taxpayers and are supposed to protect and
serve - would like to see someone go to a horribly violent place,
simply for possessing marijuana, or growing some in their home.
Keeping the population obedient to the state under the threat of
violence or death is akin to terrorism, in my view.
There is one group of law-enforcement officials that has a different
view, however. They are called Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
(LEAP) and they can be found at http://www.leap.cc/
- - Russell Barth
Federal Medical Marijuana License Holder, Ottawa
Member Comments |
No member comments available...