GROUP FILES SUIT OVER DRUG LAW

Students for Sensible Drug Policy filed a federal lawsuit against the
U.S. Department of Education last week, calling the denial of
financial aid to students convicted of drug misdemeanors unconstitutional.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the suit on behalf of SSDP
against Department of Education Secretary Margaret Spellings,
alleging a federal law cutting off financial aid to students
convicted of a drug offense violates their rights under the due process clause.

The complaint specifically points to the Higher Education Act Aid
Elimination Provision, which denies federal student aid for one year
to students convicted of possessing a controlled substance, two years
for those twice convicted, and permanently for those with three or
more convictions.

"This financial aid ban causes more drug abuse," SSDP Campaigns
Director Tom Angell said. "Kicking kids out of school only increases
drug abuse in our country. It's senseless, and beyond that, it's
unconstitutional. It punishes kids for the same thing twice."

According to the complaint, the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth
Amendment prohibits the denial of educational financial assistance to
students convicted of a drug offense. Since drug offenders already
receive separate criminal punishment, the lawsuit says, restrictions
on financial aid because of the same crime are unconstitutional.

University of Wisconsin junior Nathan Bush, one of three plaintiffs
named in the lawsuit, said having his financial aid restricted is unfair.

"I had my day in court and I got my fines and now they're going to
punish me again next year," Bush, who is ineligible for aid in the
next school year, said. "It shouldn't be that way."

UW political science professor Donald Downs called the law "overkill"
and said it may constitute double jeopardy in a moral sense. However,
he said he does not believe there is a strong constitutional argument
to support SSDP's claims.

Though Downs said the addition of a financial aid penalty to a drug
conviction does not necessarily constitute double jeopardy as it is
outlined in the Fifth Amendment, he criticized the law in other ways,
including its inability to allow for discretion.

The lawsuit offers even more criticism.

According to the complaint, "[w]hile any non-drug offender, from a
murderer to a shoplifter, can receive financial aid, an individual
who is caught with any amount of a controlled substance, including a
small amount of marijuana, is automatically denied aid by the federal
government."

The lawsuit goes on to say that approximately 35,000 students are
denied aid every year because of the HEA Aid Elimination Provision,
and that more than 200,000 students in the past six years have had
their "educational and professional dreams derailed, if not
destroyed," by the provision.

Susan Fischer, director of the financial aid department at UW, said
fewer than a dozen students have been denied financial aid in the
past five years. She called that a "high number," considering many
students with drug-related convictions do not even apply, and those
who do apply must self-report their convictions.

Fischer expressed her dislike for financial aid restrictions based on
drug convictions, saying she "can't think of a financial aid
professional right now who is in favor of the law."

She went on to say the law disproportionately affects lower-income
students, as drug offenders from higher-income households are less
likely to be hurt by restrictions on financial aid.

Downs further criticized the law, pointing to other inconsistencies.

"Why don't we just do away with financial aid to every student who
engages in underage drinking?" he said. "It's something that amounts
to a drug, it's illegal - in the end, it's the same."

According to Angell, Congress scaled back the law in February of this
year to apply only to students who were convicted of drug offenses
while already receiving financial aid.

He called the law alteration a victory, but also noted it is only
partial reform and still contains "fundamental problems."

A bill recently passed the Wisconsin state Assembly that would have
similar effects on students, as it seeks to deny state financial aid
to those convicted of drug offenses while already receiving the aid.

The Wisconsin bill would have to gain Senate approval before being
sent to Gov. Jim Doyle for review.