News (Media Awareness Project) - CN MB: PUB LTE: Surpassing Standards |
Title: | CN MB: PUB LTE: Surpassing Standards |
Published On: | 2011-11-03 |
Source: | Winnipeg Free Press (CN MB) |
Fetched On: | 2011-11-09 06:00:57 |
SURPASSING STANDARDS
Re: Tories put MDs on the hook for pot (Oct. 30). As a therapeutic
herb, or natural health product, cannabis cannot be subjected to the
sort of clinical trials applied to pharmaceuticals.
More important, herbs cannot be patented, so there is no incentive
for private pharmaceutical companies to shepherd them through the
expensive drug-approval process.
Cannabis, however, already surpasses the accepted standards for
natural health products. According to the U.S. Institute of Medicine,
the benefit-risk profile of cannabis is well within that of many
commonly used pharmaceutical drugs. A far greater number of studies
have already demonstrated the health benefits and safety of cannabis
than exist for such medical standbys as Aspirin, penicillin and codeine.
Indeed, these latter drugs (and many more) were approved for sale
without any controlled clinical trials whatsoever. Instead, they were
"grandfathered" into the approved formulary back in the 1930s by
virtue of longtime experience showing them to be safe (the so-called
generally recognized as safe, or GRAS, process).
As a similarly long-used medicine (much longer if we count more than
10,000 years of experience in Asia and India), cannabis should also
have received grandfathered status but, for purely political reasons,
it did not.
Given the widespread use of cannabis, surely doctors should already
be familiar with the effects, contraindications and drug
interactions. At a minimum, doctors surely could attest to the fact
that their patients would benefit from not fearing arrest or being
criminalized.
MATTHEW M. ELROD Victoria
Re: Tories put MDs on the hook for pot (Oct. 30). As a therapeutic
herb, or natural health product, cannabis cannot be subjected to the
sort of clinical trials applied to pharmaceuticals.
More important, herbs cannot be patented, so there is no incentive
for private pharmaceutical companies to shepherd them through the
expensive drug-approval process.
Cannabis, however, already surpasses the accepted standards for
natural health products. According to the U.S. Institute of Medicine,
the benefit-risk profile of cannabis is well within that of many
commonly used pharmaceutical drugs. A far greater number of studies
have already demonstrated the health benefits and safety of cannabis
than exist for such medical standbys as Aspirin, penicillin and codeine.
Indeed, these latter drugs (and many more) were approved for sale
without any controlled clinical trials whatsoever. Instead, they were
"grandfathered" into the approved formulary back in the 1930s by
virtue of longtime experience showing them to be safe (the so-called
generally recognized as safe, or GRAS, process).
As a similarly long-used medicine (much longer if we count more than
10,000 years of experience in Asia and India), cannabis should also
have received grandfathered status but, for purely political reasons,
it did not.
Given the widespread use of cannabis, surely doctors should already
be familiar with the effects, contraindications and drug
interactions. At a minimum, doctors surely could attest to the fact
that their patients would benefit from not fearing arrest or being
criminalized.
MATTHEW M. ELROD Victoria
Member Comments |
No member comments available...