GOING BACKWARD IN DRUG WAR

New Federal Effort Against Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Will Fail
As Have All Other Efforts at Prohibition.

The four U.S. attorneys in California announced last week yet another
federal marijuana program, with this one aimed at closing down
medical marijuana dispensaries. Not only will this program be as
hopeless as its predecessors, it is yet another continuing example of
the arrogance, hypocrisy and bullying of the federal government in this area.

There is no question that some medical marijuana dispensaries are
acting outside of California law, as established by Proposition 215
and its progeny. But the answer is for those involved to be
prosecuted by the state of California, not the feds.

As for the arrogance, bullying and hypocrisy, this new program has
the fully intended result of depriving the targeted dispensaries of a
trial by a jury of Californians. How so? Because it is using the IRS
to disallow all deductions of dispensaries' business expenses, and is
using the FBI to send letters to the landlords threatening
administratively to seize their properties if they don't close down
their tenants' dispensaries.

Even putting aside these issues, the practical problem is that
programs of this kind don't work. Since 1970, police have arrested 20
million Americans for marijuana offenses, of which 90 percent were
for simple possession. Nevertheless, those expenditures of scarce
criminal justice resources have failed to reduce public demand or
access to marijuana. In fact, virtually any teenager will tell you
that, today, it is easier for them to get marijuana, if they want to,
than it is alcohol.

Thus, calling marijuana a "controlled substance" is the biggest
oxymoron of our day. Prohibition leaves governments with no controls
whatsoever over things like age restrictions, quality, quantity or
place of sale. Those important issues are left in the complete
control of Mexican drug cartels, juvenile street gangs and other
thugs, which is where most of the customers will go once the
dispensaries are closed down.

And how is business? Today the largest cash crop in California is
marijuana. (No. 2 is grapes, if you care.) Several years ago the head
of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration was quoted as saying that
60 percent of the gross revenue for Mexican drug cartels came from
the sale of marijuana, and that figure probably also holds true for
juvenile street gangs as well. And, of course, none of those sales are taxed.

Melinda Haag, the U.S. attorney for the San Francisco-based Northern
District of California, unintentionally demonstrated why the new
program will not work when she said, "Marijuana cultivators are
converting our public lands and pristine national forests into
large-scale clandestine marijuana grow operations. They are cutting
down trees and plants. They are diverting streams, polluting the
water table and the land with processed pesticides."

Of course, she is right about what is happening under today's system.
But bringing the growing and selling of marijuana back under the
control of the government will change that, just like it did with
alcohol with the repeal of Prohibition. Why? Because today we do not
see Mexican drug cartels growing illegal vineyards in our national
forests in competition with Robert Mondavi. And we also do not see
teenagers selling Jim Beam bourbon to each other on their school
campuses. But those things are happening with marijuana all the time.

So what should be done? There is a bill pending in Congress, HR 2306,
that would take marijuana off the five federal lists of controlled
substances and allow each state to address the issue in the manner
that each deemed most effective. We should contact our federal
representatives and encourage them to support this bill.

And on the November 2012 ballot we will have an initiative that will
strictly regulate and control the recreational use of marijuana for
adults. You can see the exact language at RegulateMarijuanaLikeWine.com.

Importantly, this initiative will not change existing laws about
driving under the influence of marijuana, people using or being
impaired by marijuana in public or in the workplace, or any laws
about marijuana for people under age 21. And the program will be
administered by California's Alcohol Beverage Control Board, just
like wine, and the commercial advertising of recreational marijuana
will be prohibited.

I have never used marijuana, and have no intention to do so (unless
it is recommended by a medical doctor to alleviate some medical
malady). But we should reclaim our rights back from the federal
government to make our own decisions about marijuana. Regulate it,
control it, tax it, and make it less available for children. What's
not to like? The federal government clearly does not have all the
answers, and we are mature and experienced enough to handle this
issue ourselves!