News (Media Awareness Project) - US MI: Appeals Court: Medical Marijuana Users Must Have ID To |
Title: | US MI: Appeals Court: Medical Marijuana Users Must Have ID To |
Published On: | 2011-08-31 |
Source: | Detroit Free Press (MI) |
Fetched On: | 2011-09-03 06:02:28 |
APPEALS COURT: MEDICAL MARIJUANA USERS MUST HAVE I.D. TO GROW
PLANTS
In a second major medical marijuana decision this month, the Michigan
Court of Appeals said that users must have their state-issued
identification cards before they can legally grow their own drugs.
With their ruling in a Montmorency County case, appellate judges
upheld a Circuit Court decision that Brian Bebout Reed could be tried
for manufacture of marijuana even though he'd gotten his user's card.
According to court records, Reed, who had chronic back problems from a
degenerative disk disease, was trying to find a doctor to approve
marijuana use in August 2009 when a narcotics team spotted six plants
growing on his property.
Later that month, he got a doctor's certification and received his
user's card in October. Ten days after he got his card, he was
arrested for growing the marijuana.
He argued the charges should be dismissed because he'd become a
registered user before his arrest.
The appellate court rejected that position: "It would qualify as
absurd if it were possible to assert the ...affirmative defense by
obtaining a physician's statement after the crime has been committed
but before an arrest has been made."
Without the card at the time of the alleged crime, there is no
immunity "from arrest, prosecution, or penalty," the court said.
Last week, the appellate court outlawed retail sales at marijuana
dispensaries. In that case, the court ruled that a dispensary's
business model of charging clients a fee to store marijuana that could
be sold to any registered patient was illegal.
PLANTS
In a second major medical marijuana decision this month, the Michigan
Court of Appeals said that users must have their state-issued
identification cards before they can legally grow their own drugs.
With their ruling in a Montmorency County case, appellate judges
upheld a Circuit Court decision that Brian Bebout Reed could be tried
for manufacture of marijuana even though he'd gotten his user's card.
According to court records, Reed, who had chronic back problems from a
degenerative disk disease, was trying to find a doctor to approve
marijuana use in August 2009 when a narcotics team spotted six plants
growing on his property.
Later that month, he got a doctor's certification and received his
user's card in October. Ten days after he got his card, he was
arrested for growing the marijuana.
He argued the charges should be dismissed because he'd become a
registered user before his arrest.
The appellate court rejected that position: "It would qualify as
absurd if it were possible to assert the ...affirmative defense by
obtaining a physician's statement after the crime has been committed
but before an arrest has been made."
Without the card at the time of the alleged crime, there is no
immunity "from arrest, prosecution, or penalty," the court said.
Last week, the appellate court outlawed retail sales at marijuana
dispensaries. In that case, the court ruled that a dispensary's
business model of charging clients a fee to store marijuana that could
be sold to any registered patient was illegal.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...