News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: No Charges Approved By Crown Counsel |
Title: | CN BC: No Charges Approved By Crown Counsel |
Published On: | 2011-08-18 |
Source: | Mission City Record (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2011-08-20 06:02:48 |
NO CHARGES APPROVED BY CROWN COUNSEL
Leak Remains Unresolved, Says Mayor
The RCMP investigation into alleged breach of trust and breach of the
Community Charter surrounding Coun. Jenny Stevens and former
councillor Ron Taylor will not result in charges, according to a
statement read out by Stevens at council Monday evening.
Sgt. Peter Thiessen, senior media relations officer for the Lower
Mainland District Regional Police Service, confirmed on Wednesday that
RCMP documentation was reviewed by Crown Counsel, who decided no
charges would be approved.
As neither Stevens or Taylor were charged, police did not officially
release their names in the press release.
"The RCMP does not typically make public announcements when there are
no charges approved," said Thiessen in a statement. "However, because
of the nature of the allegations, and the fact that the incident
received wide media coverage, we felt it was important to make an
official statement upon the conclusion of this investigation."
Stevens' and Taylor's computers were seized by the RCMP in May over
suspicions by council that in-camera information about the Public
Inspection Safety Team (PSIT) review had been leaked to Taylor.
Although Taylor admits he released the leaked information publicly, he
said the decision to hire a "spin doctor" to handle the PSIT review
should never have been made behind closed doors.
Taylor added that this admission does not mean the information came
from Stevens.
Taylor said the Mounties never made an official statement about the
investigation and is unaware of any other councillors who have had
their computers confiscated by police.
"We never did see what provoked the search warrant," said
Taylor.
When asked, each of the councillors and the mayor said no computers
were taken from them.
Three computers were taken from Taylor's home, which he said was
distressing because initially he was told by police he might never get
them back.
"What terrified me was I had data on that machine, which they would
not let me at, which I desperately needed," he said, referring to
important medical test results he had stored on his computer.
He also had 20 years of genealogical research saved as
well.
Political activist Larry Nundal asked council Monday whether they
would now apologize to Stevens. Coun. Paul Horn answered that council
would be reviewing the statement provided by Stevens.
Mayor James Atebe said the public should not assume the RCMP
investigation is concluded. The initial decision to involve the police
was made unanimously by council, including Stevens, to find the source
of the in-camera leak, which remains unresolved.
"We can't come to conclusions until the community is given the full
information and that remains in the hands of both the RCMP and the
Crown Counsel," he said.
PSIT was put on indefinite review in January, but that examination
will come to a complete stop, pending the outcome of a lawsuit filed
against the district, according to a document submitted to council
Monday.
Leak Remains Unresolved, Says Mayor
The RCMP investigation into alleged breach of trust and breach of the
Community Charter surrounding Coun. Jenny Stevens and former
councillor Ron Taylor will not result in charges, according to a
statement read out by Stevens at council Monday evening.
Sgt. Peter Thiessen, senior media relations officer for the Lower
Mainland District Regional Police Service, confirmed on Wednesday that
RCMP documentation was reviewed by Crown Counsel, who decided no
charges would be approved.
As neither Stevens or Taylor were charged, police did not officially
release their names in the press release.
"The RCMP does not typically make public announcements when there are
no charges approved," said Thiessen in a statement. "However, because
of the nature of the allegations, and the fact that the incident
received wide media coverage, we felt it was important to make an
official statement upon the conclusion of this investigation."
Stevens' and Taylor's computers were seized by the RCMP in May over
suspicions by council that in-camera information about the Public
Inspection Safety Team (PSIT) review had been leaked to Taylor.
Although Taylor admits he released the leaked information publicly, he
said the decision to hire a "spin doctor" to handle the PSIT review
should never have been made behind closed doors.
Taylor added that this admission does not mean the information came
from Stevens.
Taylor said the Mounties never made an official statement about the
investigation and is unaware of any other councillors who have had
their computers confiscated by police.
"We never did see what provoked the search warrant," said
Taylor.
When asked, each of the councillors and the mayor said no computers
were taken from them.
Three computers were taken from Taylor's home, which he said was
distressing because initially he was told by police he might never get
them back.
"What terrified me was I had data on that machine, which they would
not let me at, which I desperately needed," he said, referring to
important medical test results he had stored on his computer.
He also had 20 years of genealogical research saved as
well.
Political activist Larry Nundal asked council Monday whether they
would now apologize to Stevens. Coun. Paul Horn answered that council
would be reviewing the statement provided by Stevens.
Mayor James Atebe said the public should not assume the RCMP
investigation is concluded. The initial decision to involve the police
was made unanimously by council, including Stevens, to find the source
of the in-camera leak, which remains unresolved.
"We can't come to conclusions until the community is given the full
information and that remains in the hands of both the RCMP and the
Crown Counsel," he said.
PSIT was put on indefinite review in January, but that examination
will come to a complete stop, pending the outcome of a lawsuit filed
against the district, according to a document submitted to council
Monday.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...