News (Media Awareness Project) - US: War on Drugs: Time For A Surge In New Thoughts |
Title: | US: War on Drugs: Time For A Surge In New Thoughts |
Published On: | 2011-08-16 |
Source: | Huffington Post (US Web) |
Fetched On: | 2011-08-17 06:01:52 |
WAR ON DRUGS: TIME FOR A SURGE IN NEW THOUGHTS
Imagine a civil war that has raged for 40+ years. A war that has
claimed tens of thousands of casualties both at home and abroad,
destroyed the lives of countless innocent bystanders, turned
neighborhoods and in some cases whole regions into killing fields,
filled prisons to overflowing, poisoned farmlands and forests,
undermined police and government agencies, corrupted multi-national
banks and financial companies, funded overseas enemies and terrorists,
and despite the tremendous cost in blood and treasure has not advanced
the cause for which the war was declared.
Of course we are talking about the so-called War on Drugs, escalated
in 1970 by President Richard Nixon, with roots dating back to the
Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914. Since 1970 the rate of drug use and
abuse has not substantially decreased except for minor fluctuations
that have never become permanent. In that same time, new drugs have
come on the scene to claim new victims, and vast commercial empires
have arisen built on drug money.
It's time to ask ourselves if our real goal is to reduce drug abuse or
to provide business incentives for drug dealers? Illegal drugs are a
global multi-billion dollar industry based almost entirely on illegal
drug prohibition.
When our country tried the "noble experiment" of prohibiting alcohol
in the 1920's, we learned that however well intended the effort, its
effects were anything but noble. In the 13 years that Prohibition
lasted, crime syndicates gained a permanent foothold, law enforcement
experienced massive corruption, and drinking acquired an outlaw glamor
that made it acceptable in places where it had formerly been shunned.
This was all built on the profits of a mere 13 years. What have we
suffered from the influx of several decades of illegal drug revenues?
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting a different outcome. Not only has the War on Drugs
failed, but it continues to make the situation worse. A new strategy
is needed.
There are many questions to be addressed: Is it possible to treat drug
addiction as a disease, as we do alcoholism? Can we separate dangerous
or criminal behavior (e.g., driving under the influence) from the act
of using the intoxicating substance? Can we make treatment more
readily available? Can we stop encouraging the creation of violent
drug cartels that subvert our laws in the pursuit of obscene profits?
What are the underlying social circumstances that make drug use
appealing? How do we educate youth effectively about the risks of drug
use? What is the best way to take the profit out of the current
system? Alcohol use became more manageable when the money pipeline was
cut off, and liquor sales came under the regulation of the states.
The first step is to admit that we have a problem, one as serious as
any foreign aggressor or economic calamity. While it's too soon to
know what strategy will be the most effective, we should now recognize
that our greatest weapon is not our criminal justice system, whose
resources have been taxed to the limit by acting as the front line in
this struggle, but rather our public health and educational
institutions. We need a national discussion with full participation by
law enforcement, physicians and nurses, scientists, addiction
counselors, addicts, all levels of government, and anyone and everyone
who can contribute. This discussion must be civil, thoughtful, and
unemotional with a goal of developing and implementing a drug control
strategy that is based on science and not on politics.
Drug use will never be completely eradicated, but that doesn't mean we
should throw up our hands and do nothing. We need to get back to what
should have been the goal of the War on Drugs all along: a society
where drug abuse is as rare and as manageable as we can make it. How
can we minimize the destruction of individuals, families, and
neighborhoods that it causes? That is a goal worthy of our nation's
energy and resources and one that is within our reach if we choose to
focus our serious attention on it.
Imagine a civil war that has raged for 40+ years. A war that has
claimed tens of thousands of casualties both at home and abroad,
destroyed the lives of countless innocent bystanders, turned
neighborhoods and in some cases whole regions into killing fields,
filled prisons to overflowing, poisoned farmlands and forests,
undermined police and government agencies, corrupted multi-national
banks and financial companies, funded overseas enemies and terrorists,
and despite the tremendous cost in blood and treasure has not advanced
the cause for which the war was declared.
Of course we are talking about the so-called War on Drugs, escalated
in 1970 by President Richard Nixon, with roots dating back to the
Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914. Since 1970 the rate of drug use and
abuse has not substantially decreased except for minor fluctuations
that have never become permanent. In that same time, new drugs have
come on the scene to claim new victims, and vast commercial empires
have arisen built on drug money.
It's time to ask ourselves if our real goal is to reduce drug abuse or
to provide business incentives for drug dealers? Illegal drugs are a
global multi-billion dollar industry based almost entirely on illegal
drug prohibition.
When our country tried the "noble experiment" of prohibiting alcohol
in the 1920's, we learned that however well intended the effort, its
effects were anything but noble. In the 13 years that Prohibition
lasted, crime syndicates gained a permanent foothold, law enforcement
experienced massive corruption, and drinking acquired an outlaw glamor
that made it acceptable in places where it had formerly been shunned.
This was all built on the profits of a mere 13 years. What have we
suffered from the influx of several decades of illegal drug revenues?
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting a different outcome. Not only has the War on Drugs
failed, but it continues to make the situation worse. A new strategy
is needed.
There are many questions to be addressed: Is it possible to treat drug
addiction as a disease, as we do alcoholism? Can we separate dangerous
or criminal behavior (e.g., driving under the influence) from the act
of using the intoxicating substance? Can we make treatment more
readily available? Can we stop encouraging the creation of violent
drug cartels that subvert our laws in the pursuit of obscene profits?
What are the underlying social circumstances that make drug use
appealing? How do we educate youth effectively about the risks of drug
use? What is the best way to take the profit out of the current
system? Alcohol use became more manageable when the money pipeline was
cut off, and liquor sales came under the regulation of the states.
The first step is to admit that we have a problem, one as serious as
any foreign aggressor or economic calamity. While it's too soon to
know what strategy will be the most effective, we should now recognize
that our greatest weapon is not our criminal justice system, whose
resources have been taxed to the limit by acting as the front line in
this struggle, but rather our public health and educational
institutions. We need a national discussion with full participation by
law enforcement, physicians and nurses, scientists, addiction
counselors, addicts, all levels of government, and anyone and everyone
who can contribute. This discussion must be civil, thoughtful, and
unemotional with a goal of developing and implementing a drug control
strategy that is based on science and not on politics.
Drug use will never be completely eradicated, but that doesn't mean we
should throw up our hands and do nothing. We need to get back to what
should have been the goal of the War on Drugs all along: a society
where drug abuse is as rare and as manageable as we can make it. How
can we minimize the destruction of individuals, families, and
neighborhoods that it causes? That is a goal worthy of our nation's
energy and resources and one that is within our reach if we choose to
focus our serious attention on it.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...