News (Media Awareness Project) - US OH: PUB LTE: Time To Take A New Approach In War On Drugs |
Title: | US OH: PUB LTE: Time To Take A New Approach In War On Drugs |
Published On: | 2011-07-21 |
Source: | Marietta Times, The (OH) |
Fetched On: | 2011-07-23 06:00:40 |
TIME TO TAKE A NEW APPROACH IN WAR ON DRUGS
A story in Monday's Times headlined "'Bath salts' shop owner is due
in court today'" reported on a local businessman's unenviable
position of experiencing the legal system after police arrested him
on drug-related charges. A more accurate title would have been
"Police arrest non-violent individual doing stupid, voluntary actions."
The arrest of non-violent offenders is completely illegitimate with
few positive consequences, even recognizing the harmful and
non-beneficial effects of drug use. To combat drug use and violence
within society, one fact must be acknowledged: the war on drugs has
exacerbated the drug problem and prevents positive solutions from developing.
Before the avalanche of letters accusing me of promoting drug use,
let me counter such foolish arguments. I do not advocate drug use,
but I do advocate protecting individual liberty of consenting and
non-violent adults to act in ways they desire, even if they harm their health.
The war on drugs has been an abject failure: drugs are more prevalent
and much more harmful. Instead of providing a legal system to address
conflict in a non-violent way, the prohibition of drugs ensures
violence for dispute resolution. Whereas legalizing drugs limits the
availability and holds individuals accountable for harm, theft and
deceit, prohibition encourages violent action, destroys any possible
accountability, and treats sick individuals as criminals rather than patients.
Rather than listen to individuals pontificate on their moral
superiority whilst defending the war on drugs, an analysis of its
actual effects should determine public policy. Good intentions do not
vindicate terrible effects. Prohibition of alcohol benefited
ruthlessly evil gangs, corrupt police and politicians, harmed
consumers, and caused the deaths of many innocent bystanders. The
same is true of drug prohibition. Visit www.cato.org/raidmap to
examine the unintended consequences of botched police raids that
resulted in the death of innocent and non-violent individuals and
police officers.
If our goal as a community is to provide a safe and prosperous
environment for individuals and our children, drugs must be in the
hands of accountable businesses, not violent criminals.
Many individuals in this community recognized that alcohol
prohibition was a disaster, and restricting the sale and ownership of
guns only benefits criminals. The war on drugs is no different.
Drug abuse, just as alcohol abuse and crime, will continue to be an
issue. When we abolish the war on drugs, however, we will be able to
intelligently address the issue and have a safer community.
If we refuse to admit past mistakes and continue a failed policy,
we'll perpetuate the arrest of non-violent and productive business
owners and intensify the drug problem, wondering why it fails as we
waste increasingly large amounts of money.
Anthony Hennen
Little Hocking
A story in Monday's Times headlined "'Bath salts' shop owner is due
in court today'" reported on a local businessman's unenviable
position of experiencing the legal system after police arrested him
on drug-related charges. A more accurate title would have been
"Police arrest non-violent individual doing stupid, voluntary actions."
The arrest of non-violent offenders is completely illegitimate with
few positive consequences, even recognizing the harmful and
non-beneficial effects of drug use. To combat drug use and violence
within society, one fact must be acknowledged: the war on drugs has
exacerbated the drug problem and prevents positive solutions from developing.
Before the avalanche of letters accusing me of promoting drug use,
let me counter such foolish arguments. I do not advocate drug use,
but I do advocate protecting individual liberty of consenting and
non-violent adults to act in ways they desire, even if they harm their health.
The war on drugs has been an abject failure: drugs are more prevalent
and much more harmful. Instead of providing a legal system to address
conflict in a non-violent way, the prohibition of drugs ensures
violence for dispute resolution. Whereas legalizing drugs limits the
availability and holds individuals accountable for harm, theft and
deceit, prohibition encourages violent action, destroys any possible
accountability, and treats sick individuals as criminals rather than patients.
Rather than listen to individuals pontificate on their moral
superiority whilst defending the war on drugs, an analysis of its
actual effects should determine public policy. Good intentions do not
vindicate terrible effects. Prohibition of alcohol benefited
ruthlessly evil gangs, corrupt police and politicians, harmed
consumers, and caused the deaths of many innocent bystanders. The
same is true of drug prohibition. Visit www.cato.org/raidmap to
examine the unintended consequences of botched police raids that
resulted in the death of innocent and non-violent individuals and
police officers.
If our goal as a community is to provide a safe and prosperous
environment for individuals and our children, drugs must be in the
hands of accountable businesses, not violent criminals.
Many individuals in this community recognized that alcohol
prohibition was a disaster, and restricting the sale and ownership of
guns only benefits criminals. The war on drugs is no different.
Drug abuse, just as alcohol abuse and crime, will continue to be an
issue. When we abolish the war on drugs, however, we will be able to
intelligently address the issue and have a safer community.
If we refuse to admit past mistakes and continue a failed policy,
we'll perpetuate the arrest of non-violent and productive business
owners and intensify the drug problem, wondering why it fails as we
waste increasingly large amounts of money.
Anthony Hennen
Little Hocking
Member Comments |
No member comments available...