Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Hemp Vs Pot
Title:US CA: Hemp Vs Pot
Published On:2011-07-14
Source:Chico News & Review, The (CA)
Fetched On:2011-07-16 06:02:22
HEMP VS. POT

A new law would allow once-banned hemp grows just miles outside
downtown Sacramento. So why are cannabis cultivators opposed to
hemp's big breakthrough?

California's cannabis growers are on a collision course with legalized hemp.

A new bill from San Francisco state Sen. Mark Leno seeks to authorize
an eight-year, five-county pilot project to grow fields of hemp,
marijuana's sober cousin. But fields of industrial hemp can actually
ruin marijuana crops, stuff like Blue Dream, Grand Daddy Purple and
Sour Tsunami.

"The [possible] passage of Sen. Leno's hemp bill is not good news for
California's medical marijuana industry," explained Dale Gieringer,
California coordinator for National Organization for the Reform of
Marijuana Laws, or NORML, in an email. He explained that hemp pollen
can contaminate other cannabis plants, in some cases 100 miles away.

Senate Bill 676, which recently made it out of committee with a
unanimous vote, would authorize hemp grows in nearby Yolo County, in
addition to San Joaquin, Kern, Kings and Imperial counties. "While
these are mainly downwind from California's prime marijuana growing
regions," Gieringer noted, "a stray east wind could pollute the crop."

Pot cultivators say they must maintain constant vigilance against all
pollen. Even in an all-indoor grow, female plants can suddenly go
hermaphroditic, pollinate and ruin an entire $100,000 crop.

According to celebrity grower Ed Rosenthal-who's said to have sold
about a million copies of books on marijuana cultivation-hemp pollen
can indeed travel far and wide, and ruin medical marijuana. But it
usually travels around 2 miles, he said in an interview.

Meanwhile, the long-maligned hemp plant could use a legislative
breakthrough, activists say.

The tall canes-which can't get you high-have been used since the dawn
of time as food, fiber and fuel. The United States banned hemp in the
mid-20th century during a crusade against the psychoactive version of
cannabis sativa.

Today, Americans buy hemp products at U.S. stores, but the raw stuff
must be imported from Canada and beyond. Demand for hemp products is
up, however, and California farmers could get paid to fix their soil,
states the Drug Policy Alliance, who supports Leno's bill.

Hemp also boasts strong fibers and a wealth of amino acids in the
seed oil, according to the DPA. It could be used to replace pulp wood
as well as many synthetic fibers. And the oil could be used instead
of trans fats, which can improve nutrition.

Leno's bill is also supported by the likes of American Hemp Inc.,
California Certified Organic Farmers, California Teamsters Public
Affairs Council, Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps, Imperial County Farm
Bureau, and the United Food and Commercial Workers Western States Council.

But in addition to the reservations expressed by the medical-pot
industry, the California Narcotic Officers' Association, the
Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs and the California Police
Chiefs Association oppose the pilot project. They argue that hemp is
indistinguishable from medical cannabis and will impact enforcement.

This, of course, is not altogether true. Hemp boasts less than 1
percent THC, while a big, budded marijuana plant boasts THC levels of
up to 24 percent, copious resin and an unmistakable aroma.

One activist put it this way: "How do you tell if the field on the
side of road in the Central Valley is hemp or marijuana? That's easy.
If it's ungated and anyone can come in and take it, then it's hemp."

The Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs contends that S.B.
676 contravenes federal law and that its "passage will create
confusion to growers, who may not understand they would be subject to
federal prosecution even if growing hemp were permitted by state law."

"Creating physical or legal ambiguity is not good criminal justice
policy," the ALADS statement said.

Down the road, California might eventually have to clarify that
entire regions are designated for either hemp growing or medical
cannabis. Presumably, hemp would be grown in the Central Valley, and
marijuana up north.

Farmers can't profit off hemp in California's arid Central Valley,
due to its irrigation costs compared to its market value, he said.
But Rosenthal said that, on an even longer timeline, hemp could even
be grown in places like Ohio-as it once surely did long ago.
Member Comments
No member comments available...