News (Media Awareness Project) - US FL: Editorial: Scott, Legislature Wade In Murky Testing |
Title: | US FL: Editorial: Scott, Legislature Wade In Murky Testing |
Published On: | 2011-06-10 |
Source: | News Chief (FL) |
Fetched On: | 2011-06-12 06:01:43 |
SCOTT, LEGISLATURE WADE IN MURKY TESTING WATERS
If Gov. Rick Scott and the Florida Legislature were hoping to create
jobs, they certainly stimulated the legal profession with two new
edicts on drug testing.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed suit to block the governor's
executive order requiring some 100,000 state employees be tested for
drugs.
The group also is likely to sue to overturn new legislation that
requires all welfare recipients to be screened for controlled
substances. If they test positive, they lose their benefits.
Like the ACLU, we see these measures as unconstitutional governmental
invasions of privacy.
In March, Scott issued an executive order requiring all new hires in
state agencies to be drug tested, and for current employees to be
tested at least four times a year. That enters murky legal territory.
The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of suspicion-less
drug testing of public school students on the grounds that their
privacy rights are less than those of adult citizens.
But when applied outside the campus, the courts generally have allowed
testing of public employees only when there is grounds to suspect drug
use, or if the person works in a position with extraordinary national
security or safety issues.
Florida agencies already can require employees to be tested when they
are suspected of using illegal drugs.
Scott, though, wants to test everyone regardless of whether there is
probable cause or whether their job affects public safety. ...
Sorry, that's not how the founders envisioned a republic of individual
liberty and restrained government.
Nor is there a strong case to be made that governments' increased
powers of interdiction have had a positive effect on demand and usage
of drugs.
In fact, a report issued by the Global Commission on Drug Policy
concluded that "repressive strategies will not solve the drug problem,
and that the war on drugs has not, and cannot, be won."
It's ironic that Florida's new drug-testing mandates come at a time of
lean state budgets.
How many tax dollars will be wasted testing the innocent just to catch
the few? The "cure" will be more costly to state coffers than the crime.
Florida can't afford this misguided policy, and Floridians can't
afford to have their rights violated. These edicts must go.
If Gov. Rick Scott and the Florida Legislature were hoping to create
jobs, they certainly stimulated the legal profession with two new
edicts on drug testing.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed suit to block the governor's
executive order requiring some 100,000 state employees be tested for
drugs.
The group also is likely to sue to overturn new legislation that
requires all welfare recipients to be screened for controlled
substances. If they test positive, they lose their benefits.
Like the ACLU, we see these measures as unconstitutional governmental
invasions of privacy.
In March, Scott issued an executive order requiring all new hires in
state agencies to be drug tested, and for current employees to be
tested at least four times a year. That enters murky legal territory.
The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of suspicion-less
drug testing of public school students on the grounds that their
privacy rights are less than those of adult citizens.
But when applied outside the campus, the courts generally have allowed
testing of public employees only when there is grounds to suspect drug
use, or if the person works in a position with extraordinary national
security or safety issues.
Florida agencies already can require employees to be tested when they
are suspected of using illegal drugs.
Scott, though, wants to test everyone regardless of whether there is
probable cause or whether their job affects public safety. ...
Sorry, that's not how the founders envisioned a republic of individual
liberty and restrained government.
Nor is there a strong case to be made that governments' increased
powers of interdiction have had a positive effect on demand and usage
of drugs.
In fact, a report issued by the Global Commission on Drug Policy
concluded that "repressive strategies will not solve the drug problem,
and that the war on drugs has not, and cannot, be won."
It's ironic that Florida's new drug-testing mandates come at a time of
lean state budgets.
How many tax dollars will be wasted testing the innocent just to catch
the few? The "cure" will be more costly to state coffers than the crime.
Florida can't afford this misguided policy, and Floridians can't
afford to have their rights violated. These edicts must go.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...