News (Media Awareness Project) - US AZ: Flagstaff Lawyer: Pot Suit Frivolous |
Title: | US AZ: Flagstaff Lawyer: Pot Suit Frivolous |
Published On: | 2011-06-03 |
Source: | Arizona Daily Sun (AZ) |
Fetched On: | 2011-06-05 06:00:33 |
FLAGSTAFF LAWYER: POT SUIT FRIVOLOUS
Flagstaff attorney Lee Phillips has spent the last week talking to
other lawyers from across the state on how to best respond to the
state's legal challenge to the voter-approved Arizona Medical
Marijuana Act.
The consensus? Another legal action from either the American Civil
Liberties Union or from the Marijuana Policy Project, the largest
marijuana policy reform organization in the country, seeking to
dismiss the suit.
Gov. Jan Brewer and Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne have said they
filed the lawsuit to clarify whether the conflict between state law
and the federal ban on marijuana puts state employees involved in
implementing the new policy at risk of federal prosecution.
Phillips, who represents clients seeking to set up dispensaries,
believes the lawsuit is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to
delay the implementation of the voter-approved medical marijuana laws.
Brewer's lawsuit, he says, essentially asks for a guarantee by the
feds not to enforce federal drug laws, which is legally impossible.
"There is no real basis in federal law for what the governor is asking
for," Phillips said.
He is optimistic the state legal action will be dismissed by a federal
judge in the near future.
Phillips, said each of his six clients here in northern Arizona
understands the difference between the federal and state laws related
to medical marijuana.
"They are doing this with their eyes open," he said.
The new state laws have built the legal framework for the state to
allow medical marijuana dispensaries to open and for patients under
strict medical supervision to seek "cards" for drug. Nearly a dozen
other states have similar laws or are in the process of enacting them.
But it is unclear, according to Brewer, how the federal government
feels about the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act.
The governor's office continues to cite a statement from the U.S.
Attorney for Arizona, Dennis Burke, that the federal government
continues to consider marijuana a controlled substance.
The statement suggests that Arizona could lose federal funding if
federal drug laws are not enforced.
"Arizonans deserve clarity on an issue with such dire legal
implications," Brewer said.
Burke has said his position on medical marijuana has not changed: The
priorities are to go after those who grow, sell or transport
marijuana, not state workers or patients.
Phillips believes the lawsuit is little more than political pandering
to the extreme right wing in Arizona politics.
"It is unfortunate that the governor and the attorney general would
choose to ignore the will of the people by filing this frivolous
lawsuit," he said. "Every day they delay the implementation of the
law, people with serious and even terminal illnesses are suffering."
Flagstaff attorney Lee Phillips has spent the last week talking to
other lawyers from across the state on how to best respond to the
state's legal challenge to the voter-approved Arizona Medical
Marijuana Act.
The consensus? Another legal action from either the American Civil
Liberties Union or from the Marijuana Policy Project, the largest
marijuana policy reform organization in the country, seeking to
dismiss the suit.
Gov. Jan Brewer and Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne have said they
filed the lawsuit to clarify whether the conflict between state law
and the federal ban on marijuana puts state employees involved in
implementing the new policy at risk of federal prosecution.
Phillips, who represents clients seeking to set up dispensaries,
believes the lawsuit is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to
delay the implementation of the voter-approved medical marijuana laws.
Brewer's lawsuit, he says, essentially asks for a guarantee by the
feds not to enforce federal drug laws, which is legally impossible.
"There is no real basis in federal law for what the governor is asking
for," Phillips said.
He is optimistic the state legal action will be dismissed by a federal
judge in the near future.
Phillips, said each of his six clients here in northern Arizona
understands the difference between the federal and state laws related
to medical marijuana.
"They are doing this with their eyes open," he said.
The new state laws have built the legal framework for the state to
allow medical marijuana dispensaries to open and for patients under
strict medical supervision to seek "cards" for drug. Nearly a dozen
other states have similar laws or are in the process of enacting them.
But it is unclear, according to Brewer, how the federal government
feels about the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act.
The governor's office continues to cite a statement from the U.S.
Attorney for Arizona, Dennis Burke, that the federal government
continues to consider marijuana a controlled substance.
The statement suggests that Arizona could lose federal funding if
federal drug laws are not enforced.
"Arizonans deserve clarity on an issue with such dire legal
implications," Brewer said.
Burke has said his position on medical marijuana has not changed: The
priorities are to go after those who grow, sell or transport
marijuana, not state workers or patients.
Phillips believes the lawsuit is little more than political pandering
to the extreme right wing in Arizona politics.
"It is unfortunate that the governor and the attorney general would
choose to ignore the will of the people by filing this frivolous
lawsuit," he said. "Every day they delay the implementation of the
law, people with serious and even terminal illnesses are suffering."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...