News (Media Awareness Project) - US AZ: Editorial: Feds Must End Pot-Law Confusion |
Title: | US AZ: Editorial: Feds Must End Pot-Law Confusion |
Published On: | 2011-05-21 |
Source: | Arizona Republic (Phoenix, AZ) |
Fetched On: | 2011-05-22 06:03:33 |
FEDS MUST END POT-LAW CONFUSION
Arizona is rolling out its medical-marijuana system in an unexpected
and needless legal haze.
If you run a state-approved dispensary for medical marijuana, federal
prosecutors might leave you alone.
Or they might not.
Your investment might be safe from federal forfeiture laws. Or it
might not.
The U.S. Justice Department has created a cloud of confusion for the
16 states that have authorized the use of marijuana for certain
conditions, including glaucoma and the side effects of cancer treatment.
In 2009, the Obama administration said it would not go after users or
providers of medical marijuana in states that had legalized it - so
long as they complied with state law. If the "medical" operation was a
cover for drug trafficking, the feds would jump in.
The policy seemed unambiguous when Arizona voters approved medical
marijuana last November.
Now it's not.
Dennis Burke, U.S. attorney for Arizona, sent a letter on May 2 to the
director of the state Department of Health Services, warning that his
office would "continue to vigorously prosecute individuals and
organizations that participate in unlawful manufacturing, distribution
and marketing activity involving marijuana, even if such activities
are permitted under state law."
He cautioned that property owners, landlords and financiers could be
liable.
Burke's not alone. Federal prosecutors in at least six other states -
Colorado, Maine, Montana, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington - have
written letters raising similar warning flags.
They want to make it clear that state law is no safe haven: Drug
dealers shouldn't expect to cite "medicinal purposes" as a defense for
breaking federal laws that make marijuana a controlled substance.
Agreed.
That, however, is no barrier to returning to the 2009 policy. The
administration should reaffirm it: Individuals and entities that use
or distribute marijuana in full compliance with state laws should not
be targeted by federal law enforcement.
As more and more states approve pot as a treatment for certain
conditions, we need to look at clearing up the uncomfortable
contradiction with federal drug laws.
And there's a sensible route that's worth careful consideration.
Marijuana is classified as a Schedule 1 drug, illegal for any use. Yet
harder drugs such as cocaine are Schedule 2, allowing their medical
use.
The Drug Enforcement Agency can change the classification of marijuana
after going through a process that includes scientific and medical
evaluations, or Congress can do it outright.
Pot would then join the many other drugs that are legal when properly
prescribed and illegal when peddled for abuse. Federal prosecutors
would still be able to go after the Mexican cartels that deal in
marijuana and violence.
And states could concentrate on making the term "medical" legally
meaningful.
Arizona is rolling out its medical-marijuana system in an unexpected
and needless legal haze.
If you run a state-approved dispensary for medical marijuana, federal
prosecutors might leave you alone.
Or they might not.
Your investment might be safe from federal forfeiture laws. Or it
might not.
The U.S. Justice Department has created a cloud of confusion for the
16 states that have authorized the use of marijuana for certain
conditions, including glaucoma and the side effects of cancer treatment.
In 2009, the Obama administration said it would not go after users or
providers of medical marijuana in states that had legalized it - so
long as they complied with state law. If the "medical" operation was a
cover for drug trafficking, the feds would jump in.
The policy seemed unambiguous when Arizona voters approved medical
marijuana last November.
Now it's not.
Dennis Burke, U.S. attorney for Arizona, sent a letter on May 2 to the
director of the state Department of Health Services, warning that his
office would "continue to vigorously prosecute individuals and
organizations that participate in unlawful manufacturing, distribution
and marketing activity involving marijuana, even if such activities
are permitted under state law."
He cautioned that property owners, landlords and financiers could be
liable.
Burke's not alone. Federal prosecutors in at least six other states -
Colorado, Maine, Montana, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington - have
written letters raising similar warning flags.
They want to make it clear that state law is no safe haven: Drug
dealers shouldn't expect to cite "medicinal purposes" as a defense for
breaking federal laws that make marijuana a controlled substance.
Agreed.
That, however, is no barrier to returning to the 2009 policy. The
administration should reaffirm it: Individuals and entities that use
or distribute marijuana in full compliance with state laws should not
be targeted by federal law enforcement.
As more and more states approve pot as a treatment for certain
conditions, we need to look at clearing up the uncomfortable
contradiction with federal drug laws.
And there's a sensible route that's worth careful consideration.
Marijuana is classified as a Schedule 1 drug, illegal for any use. Yet
harder drugs such as cocaine are Schedule 2, allowing their medical
use.
The Drug Enforcement Agency can change the classification of marijuana
after going through a process that includes scientific and medical
evaluations, or Congress can do it outright.
Pot would then join the many other drugs that are legal when properly
prescribed and illegal when peddled for abuse. Federal prosecutors
would still be able to go after the Mexican cartels that deal in
marijuana and violence.
And states could concentrate on making the term "medical" legally
meaningful.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...