News (Media Awareness Project) - US MT: Judge Asked To Rule On Marijuana Transactions |
Title: | US MT: Judge Asked To Rule On Marijuana Transactions |
Published On: | 2011-04-21 |
Source: | Daily Inter Lake, The (MT) |
Fetched On: | 2011-04-24 06:00:33 |
JUDGE ASKED TO RULE ON MARIJUANA TRANSACTIONS
The Flathead County Attorney's Office is asking a District Court judge
to rule that caregiver-to-caregiver marijuana transactions are illegal
under state law.
The request comes in the wake of a similar ruling by a Missoula judge
and in response to a lawsuit filed against Flathead County Attorney Ed
Corrigan on behalf of the Medical Marijuana Growers
Association.
Missoula District Judge John Larsen ruled April 6 that the act passed
by voter initiative in 2004 "particularly prohibits a caregiver from
providing marijuana to anyone other than a qualifying patient who has
registered that specific caregiver."
That ruling was filed in response to a lawsuit filed in Missoula
District Court by attorney Chris Lindsey on behalf of caregiver Kevin
Kerr.
In Flathead District Court, Lindsey and attorney Tim Baldwin filed a
similar lawsuit on behalf of caregiver Robin Ruiz and patient Leif
Erickson after they were arrested Feb. 3 with three pounds of
marijuana while in route to Great Falls.
They want District Judge Stewart Stadler to rule that
caregiver-to-caregiver transactions are legal under the law.
Flathead County Deputy Attorney Tara Fugina asked in a reply to the
lawsuit filed Tuesday that Stadler rule that the transactions are
illegal. She also noted that Corrigan is immune to the litigation as
an elected official in charge of prosecuting crimes.
Fugina wrote that the matter would be better addressed in Montana
Supreme Court.
"Original jurisdiction should be exercised by the Supreme Court of
Montana in this matter as the issues are of interest on a statewide
basis," she wrote.
Lindsey said Wednesday that he likely will appeal Larsen's ruling to
the Supreme Court. Baldwin said the state's highest court is the
likely destination for the issue as the act can be interpreted in many
ways.
"The state needs clarification," Baldwin said. "I think ultimately it
will need to go to the Supreme Court."
On Wednesday, Baldwin and Lindsey asked District Judge David Ortley
for a stay in Ruiz' and Erickson's criminal cases.
They said the men would risk incriminating themselves or limiting
their possible legal defenses if both the civil and criminal matters
are allowed to move forward concurrently.
Ortley said he will allow prosecutors and defense attorneys to file
briefs in support of their positions before ruling on the matter. He
also asked that Deputy County Attorney Travis Ahner amend the charges
to account for the influence of the Medical Marijuana Act, which
prohibits the prosecution of cardholders.
Ruiz and Erickson both have pleaded innocent to charges of felony
possession of dangerous drugs with intent to distribute.
Ortley noted that a potential Supreme Court ruling on appeal of
Larsen's ruling would have an impact on proceedings.
"It's going to be instructive to everyone if it is in fact appealed,"
Ortley said.
Baldwin said he plans to file a detailed brief by Friday supporting
his assertion that caregiver-to-caregiver transactions are legal.
The Flathead County Attorney's Office is asking a District Court judge
to rule that caregiver-to-caregiver marijuana transactions are illegal
under state law.
The request comes in the wake of a similar ruling by a Missoula judge
and in response to a lawsuit filed against Flathead County Attorney Ed
Corrigan on behalf of the Medical Marijuana Growers
Association.
Missoula District Judge John Larsen ruled April 6 that the act passed
by voter initiative in 2004 "particularly prohibits a caregiver from
providing marijuana to anyone other than a qualifying patient who has
registered that specific caregiver."
That ruling was filed in response to a lawsuit filed in Missoula
District Court by attorney Chris Lindsey on behalf of caregiver Kevin
Kerr.
In Flathead District Court, Lindsey and attorney Tim Baldwin filed a
similar lawsuit on behalf of caregiver Robin Ruiz and patient Leif
Erickson after they were arrested Feb. 3 with three pounds of
marijuana while in route to Great Falls.
They want District Judge Stewart Stadler to rule that
caregiver-to-caregiver transactions are legal under the law.
Flathead County Deputy Attorney Tara Fugina asked in a reply to the
lawsuit filed Tuesday that Stadler rule that the transactions are
illegal. She also noted that Corrigan is immune to the litigation as
an elected official in charge of prosecuting crimes.
Fugina wrote that the matter would be better addressed in Montana
Supreme Court.
"Original jurisdiction should be exercised by the Supreme Court of
Montana in this matter as the issues are of interest on a statewide
basis," she wrote.
Lindsey said Wednesday that he likely will appeal Larsen's ruling to
the Supreme Court. Baldwin said the state's highest court is the
likely destination for the issue as the act can be interpreted in many
ways.
"The state needs clarification," Baldwin said. "I think ultimately it
will need to go to the Supreme Court."
On Wednesday, Baldwin and Lindsey asked District Judge David Ortley
for a stay in Ruiz' and Erickson's criminal cases.
They said the men would risk incriminating themselves or limiting
their possible legal defenses if both the civil and criminal matters
are allowed to move forward concurrently.
Ortley said he will allow prosecutors and defense attorneys to file
briefs in support of their positions before ruling on the matter. He
also asked that Deputy County Attorney Travis Ahner amend the charges
to account for the influence of the Medical Marijuana Act, which
prohibits the prosecution of cardholders.
Ruiz and Erickson both have pleaded innocent to charges of felony
possession of dangerous drugs with intent to distribute.
Ortley noted that a potential Supreme Court ruling on appeal of
Larsen's ruling would have an impact on proceedings.
"It's going to be instructive to everyone if it is in fact appealed,"
Ortley said.
Baldwin said he plans to file a detailed brief by Friday supporting
his assertion that caregiver-to-caregiver transactions are legal.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...