News (Media Awareness Project) - CN ON: Column: Portugal's Experiment With Drug Laws Is Paying |
Title: | CN ON: Column: Portugal's Experiment With Drug Laws Is Paying |
Published On: | 2011-03-10 |
Source: | Guelph Mercury (CN ON) |
Fetched On: | 2011-03-20 00:50:23 |
PORTUGAL'S EXPERIMENT WITH DRUG LAWS IS PAYING OFF
Imagine a country so fed up with its ineffective crime-and-punishment
approach to drug abuse that it decriminalizes the possession of small
amounts of narcotics for personal use.
At the same time, it launches a concerted effort to provide treatment
for addicts instead of just throwing them in prison. Surely such a
naive land would see a sharp increase in drug use, and perhaps a
generation of youth blighted by easy access to mind-altering
substances. But in Portugal, which is just such a country, that's not
what happened.
Drug use does seem to have gone up, but this increase may well be
illusory--and rather harmless. What's not illusory, on the other hand,
is the sharp reduction in the ills associated with drug abuse. Nine
years into its courageous experiment with sanity as a national drug
policy, Portugal is indisputably better off. And it's getting some
well-earned attention for its efforts.
Policy-makers in some other western countries, including the U.S.,
ought to pay especially close attention, given the colossal futility
of its own endless "war on drugs" -- for never has a cure been so much
more catastrophic than the disease it was intended to remedy.
With 2.3 million inmates, the United States now has the largest prison
population in the world -- and the highest per capita rate of
incarceration as well.
Absurd American drug laws play a big part in this: a quarter of U.S.
inmates are nonviolent drug offenders. Incarceration is expensive -- in
New York, it costs about $45,000 per inmate annually, not counting
pensions and other benefits for prison staff. Americans can no longer
afford to lock up so many of its citizens, and so now there is
pressure all over the U.S. to cut the number of prisoners.
This makes the Portuguese experience particularly noteworthy at the
moment. A study in the British Journal of Criminology by Caitlin E.
Hughes and Alex Stevens lays it all out. The bad news is that, as you
might expect, the price of drugs in Portugal has fallen since the
reforms, and there has been some increase in drug use among adults.
But neighboring Spain, which didn't change its laws, also saw an
increase in drug use. And the finding in Portugal may simply reflect
users' greater willingness to admit their indulgence to pollsters
since the law's relaxation.
Even if the increase is real, it doesn't much matter, because the
harms associated with drug abuse are so much diminished. Before
decriminalization, for example, Portugal had the highest rate of
drug-related AIDS in the European Union. But in the years since, the
infection rate has plunged thanks to syringe programs, methadone and
outreach efforts. Overdose deaths are down, and more addicts are in
treatment. As to prisons: Since the new law, arrests for crimes
related to drugs have fallen by almost two-thirds. Prisons fell from
119 per cent of capacity to 102 per cent. And the proportion of
prisoners incarcerated for drug-related crimes was halved.
A key factor in Portugal's success: treatment and dissuasion (via
counselling, community service and other measures) have been integral
parts of its drug reforms from the outset. Portugal's, in other words,
was a comprehensive reform. The Portuguese experience should embolden
others to try something equally sensible.
The American war on drugs is a costly failure on a larger scale than
was Prohibition, with ramifications far beyond U.S. borders. We'll
never eliminate drugs for the simple reason that too many people like
them. But it's time to figure out a way to decriminalize narcotics, at
the very least, even while firmly discouraging their use.
Imagine a country so fed up with its ineffective crime-and-punishment
approach to drug abuse that it decriminalizes the possession of small
amounts of narcotics for personal use.
At the same time, it launches a concerted effort to provide treatment
for addicts instead of just throwing them in prison. Surely such a
naive land would see a sharp increase in drug use, and perhaps a
generation of youth blighted by easy access to mind-altering
substances. But in Portugal, which is just such a country, that's not
what happened.
Drug use does seem to have gone up, but this increase may well be
illusory--and rather harmless. What's not illusory, on the other hand,
is the sharp reduction in the ills associated with drug abuse. Nine
years into its courageous experiment with sanity as a national drug
policy, Portugal is indisputably better off. And it's getting some
well-earned attention for its efforts.
Policy-makers in some other western countries, including the U.S.,
ought to pay especially close attention, given the colossal futility
of its own endless "war on drugs" -- for never has a cure been so much
more catastrophic than the disease it was intended to remedy.
With 2.3 million inmates, the United States now has the largest prison
population in the world -- and the highest per capita rate of
incarceration as well.
Absurd American drug laws play a big part in this: a quarter of U.S.
inmates are nonviolent drug offenders. Incarceration is expensive -- in
New York, it costs about $45,000 per inmate annually, not counting
pensions and other benefits for prison staff. Americans can no longer
afford to lock up so many of its citizens, and so now there is
pressure all over the U.S. to cut the number of prisoners.
This makes the Portuguese experience particularly noteworthy at the
moment. A study in the British Journal of Criminology by Caitlin E.
Hughes and Alex Stevens lays it all out. The bad news is that, as you
might expect, the price of drugs in Portugal has fallen since the
reforms, and there has been some increase in drug use among adults.
But neighboring Spain, which didn't change its laws, also saw an
increase in drug use. And the finding in Portugal may simply reflect
users' greater willingness to admit their indulgence to pollsters
since the law's relaxation.
Even if the increase is real, it doesn't much matter, because the
harms associated with drug abuse are so much diminished. Before
decriminalization, for example, Portugal had the highest rate of
drug-related AIDS in the European Union. But in the years since, the
infection rate has plunged thanks to syringe programs, methadone and
outreach efforts. Overdose deaths are down, and more addicts are in
treatment. As to prisons: Since the new law, arrests for crimes
related to drugs have fallen by almost two-thirds. Prisons fell from
119 per cent of capacity to 102 per cent. And the proportion of
prisoners incarcerated for drug-related crimes was halved.
A key factor in Portugal's success: treatment and dissuasion (via
counselling, community service and other measures) have been integral
parts of its drug reforms from the outset. Portugal's, in other words,
was a comprehensive reform. The Portuguese experience should embolden
others to try something equally sensible.
The American war on drugs is a costly failure on a larger scale than
was Prohibition, with ramifications far beyond U.S. borders. We'll
never eliminate drugs for the simple reason that too many people like
them. But it's time to figure out a way to decriminalize narcotics, at
the very least, even while firmly discouraging their use.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...