Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: County Imposes High Fee On Pot Dispensaries
Title:US CA: County Imposes High Fee On Pot Dispensaries
Published On:2011-01-26
Source:San Diego Union Tribune (CA)
Fetched On:2011-03-09 16:56:42
COUNTY IMPOSES HIGH FEE ON POT DISPENSARIES

Fingerprinting, Fees Added to Disputed Ordinance

Operating a medical marijuana dispensary in unincorporated areas of
the county is about to become a more expensive venture, under a
proposal approved Tuesday by the Board of Supervisors.

The board voted unanimously to amend its medical marijuana
regulations, imposing an annual fee of $11,017 and requiring
fingerprinting and federal clearance for operators to become certified.

Assistant Sheriff Ed Prendergast said the proposed fee reflects the
cost incurred by the Sheriff's Department to investigate, issue
permits and complete compliance checks. He said the cost is in line
with those in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Long Beach, which charge
about $8,500, $11,500 and $14,700, respectively.

Last year, San Diego became the 10th county in the state to regulate
medical marijuana collectives, restricting dispensaries to industrial
zones at least 1,000 feet from homes, schools, parks and other areas.

Cities and counties have been wrestling with the issue since state
voters legalized medical marijuana in 1996, but local municipalities
did little to regulate them. The result has been an unwinnable
situation for decision makers, Supervisor Dianne Jacob said.

"First we were criticized for not having an ordinance, now we're
being criticized for having an ordinance," Jacob said. "Some want an
outright ban and some want more flexibility. In the end, today
probably no one's going to be happy with what we end up doing."

Supervisor Ron Roberts said the need for medical marijuana was
evident, but questioned how the regulations have evolved.

"I have too many friends going through illnesses where this is a part
of their therapy to say that we don't need medical marijuana,"
Roberts said. "We've moved what should have been a medical issue into
a law enforcement issue and I think that's unfortunate."

County officials have had a total of 12 code-enforcement cases
involving medical marijuana collectives, said Joe Farace of the
Department of Planning and Land Use. Nine of the shops were shut down
for operating illegally and the other three were referred to the
County Counsel's Office, he said.

John Byron of Vista said there are two dispensaries in the
unincorporated stretch between Vista and San Marcos that have been
violating the ordinance. Both received cease-and-desist orders and
one has an upcoming court hearing - yet they continue to operate,
Byron said. He said the only way to avoid the costly situations is to
enact a countywide ban.

The fact that no one has successfully opened a dispensary in
unincorporated area of the county is evidence that the regulations
have served as a de facto ban, said Eugene Davidovich, coordinator of
Americans for Safe Access, San Diego chapter.

Vey Linville of Spring Valley said those advocating for an outright
ban too often focus on land-use issues while avoiding discussions
about patients who benefit from medical pot. About a year ago he was
referred by doctors to the University of California, San Diego, for a
double-lung transplant, Linville said. Instead, he joined a
collective, bought a quarter pound of marijuana concentrates and drank them.

"I got better," Linville said. "I am still on oxygen, but I've
outlived all prognoses and don't plan to get a transplant. I keep
getting better.

The amendments must still return to the board for ratification on Feb. 1.
Member Comments
No member comments available...