News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Proposed Pot Tax Sparks A Heated Debate |
Title: | US CA: Proposed Pot Tax Sparks A Heated Debate |
Published On: | 2011-02-07 |
Source: | Contra Costa Times (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2011-03-09 14:38:19 |
PROPOSED POT TAX SPARKS A HEATED DEBATE
Voters will face a familiar, burning issue on the March 8 city ballot:
Marijuana.
In contrast with last November's failed California proposition to
legalize recreational pot use, Los Angeles' more complicated Measure M
asks if the city should impose a hefty tax on medical-marijuana
dispensaries.
Proponents say requiring dispensary operators to "pay their fair
share" - in this case, 5percent of gross receipts - could raise
$10million a year for the city's deficit-plagued general fund.
Opponents claim the proposal won't fly because medicine and the
nonprofit organizations that dispense it cannot be taxed, and they
worry that if the city makes revenue from dispensaries, it will be
encouraged to allow more of them.
While the two sides debate the details, voters may be guided more by
their general attitudes, such as their overall feelings about
marijuana, said Jessica Levinson, who analyzes ballot initiatives for
the L.A.-based Center for Governmental Studies.
"It really comes down to what's important to voters," Levinson said.
"If they think, 'Yes, this is a measure that has problems, but people
use medical marijuana and the city needs money,' then I think they
would vote yes.
"If voters say, 'Morally, we're against the sale of marijuana no
matter what the use is,' or if they're for medical marijuana but think
the current system is being abused, then they would vote no."
Measure M was placed on the ballot by the City Council, which is
trying to climb out of a $350 million budget hole in the next fiscal
year.
It comes as the smoke clears from last November's marijuana initiative
battles.
California's Proposition 19 would have legalized - and taxed - up to
one ounce of marijuana for recreational use by adults. The initiative
lost 53.5-46.5 percent. Its backers are talking about trying again in
2012.
At the same time last year, voters in nine California cities -
including Sacramento, Oakland and San Jose - approved
medical-marijuana taxes similar to what Los Angeles is
considering.
Signatures on the official "Yes on M" argument include those of City
Council members Janice Hahn and Paul Koretz, and Pat McOsker,
president of the United Firefighters of Los Angeles City, Local 112.
"The city needs revenue. I know that as well as anyone," said McOsker,
who says the Los Angeles Fire Department budget has shrunk to $495
million from $560 million two years ago, reducing the number of
emergency responders by 156.
McOsker said United Firefighters' endorsement of Measure M doesn't
mean it necessarily endorses medical-marijuana cooperatives, let alone
recreational pot smoking.
"The voters of California decided (in 1996) that cooperatives are
legal. What we're saying is they should pay their fair share (of
taxes)," McOsker said.
The official "No on M" argument is signed by LAPD Chief Charlie Beck,
Sheriff Lee Baca, District Attorney Steve Cooley and Council members
Jan Perry and Bernard Parks.
"I think what we do (if Measure M passes) is we legitimize something
that is against the law," Beck said in an interview. "Right now the
law says we allow it to be dispensed because it's a medicine. We don't
tax medicine. ... Let's be consistent."
Beck added: "These (dispensaries) are not good for your neighborhoods.
If they become seen as a cash cow to (city officials) that are
desperate, they're going to want more of them."
Measure M's opponents include the Oakland-based medical-marijuana
advocacy group Americans for Safe Access, which contends a tax could
make medical pot costlier for patients.
Voters will face a familiar, burning issue on the March 8 city ballot:
Marijuana.
In contrast with last November's failed California proposition to
legalize recreational pot use, Los Angeles' more complicated Measure M
asks if the city should impose a hefty tax on medical-marijuana
dispensaries.
Proponents say requiring dispensary operators to "pay their fair
share" - in this case, 5percent of gross receipts - could raise
$10million a year for the city's deficit-plagued general fund.
Opponents claim the proposal won't fly because medicine and the
nonprofit organizations that dispense it cannot be taxed, and they
worry that if the city makes revenue from dispensaries, it will be
encouraged to allow more of them.
While the two sides debate the details, voters may be guided more by
their general attitudes, such as their overall feelings about
marijuana, said Jessica Levinson, who analyzes ballot initiatives for
the L.A.-based Center for Governmental Studies.
"It really comes down to what's important to voters," Levinson said.
"If they think, 'Yes, this is a measure that has problems, but people
use medical marijuana and the city needs money,' then I think they
would vote yes.
"If voters say, 'Morally, we're against the sale of marijuana no
matter what the use is,' or if they're for medical marijuana but think
the current system is being abused, then they would vote no."
Measure M was placed on the ballot by the City Council, which is
trying to climb out of a $350 million budget hole in the next fiscal
year.
It comes as the smoke clears from last November's marijuana initiative
battles.
California's Proposition 19 would have legalized - and taxed - up to
one ounce of marijuana for recreational use by adults. The initiative
lost 53.5-46.5 percent. Its backers are talking about trying again in
2012.
At the same time last year, voters in nine California cities -
including Sacramento, Oakland and San Jose - approved
medical-marijuana taxes similar to what Los Angeles is
considering.
Signatures on the official "Yes on M" argument include those of City
Council members Janice Hahn and Paul Koretz, and Pat McOsker,
president of the United Firefighters of Los Angeles City, Local 112.
"The city needs revenue. I know that as well as anyone," said McOsker,
who says the Los Angeles Fire Department budget has shrunk to $495
million from $560 million two years ago, reducing the number of
emergency responders by 156.
McOsker said United Firefighters' endorsement of Measure M doesn't
mean it necessarily endorses medical-marijuana cooperatives, let alone
recreational pot smoking.
"The voters of California decided (in 1996) that cooperatives are
legal. What we're saying is they should pay their fair share (of
taxes)," McOsker said.
The official "No on M" argument is signed by LAPD Chief Charlie Beck,
Sheriff Lee Baca, District Attorney Steve Cooley and Council members
Jan Perry and Bernard Parks.
"I think what we do (if Measure M passes) is we legitimize something
that is against the law," Beck said in an interview. "Right now the
law says we allow it to be dispensed because it's a medicine. We don't
tax medicine. ... Let's be consistent."
Beck added: "These (dispensaries) are not good for your neighborhoods.
If they become seen as a cash cow to (city officials) that are
desperate, they're going to want more of them."
Measure M's opponents include the Oakland-based medical-marijuana
advocacy group Americans for Safe Access, which contends a tax could
make medical pot costlier for patients.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...