News (Media Awareness Project) - US AZ: New Law Raises Questions for Yuma Businesses, Schools |
Title: | US AZ: New Law Raises Questions for Yuma Businesses, Schools |
Published On: | 2010-11-16 |
Source: | Sun, The (Yuma, AZ) |
Fetched On: | 2010-11-17 03:01:56 |
NEW LAW RAISES QUESTIONS FOR YUMA BUSINESSES, SCHOOLS
Confirmation over the weekend that voters by a narrow margin approved
the legal use of marijuana for those with chronic or debilitating
medical conditions begs the question about the new law's impact on
local schools, businesses and municipalities.
"From what I've read, it appears it could be a huge problem for
employers," said Ken Rosevear, executive director of the Yuma County
Chamber of Commerce. "Certain rights are given to individuals that
preclude the normal rules and policies businesses live by. It
certainly sends a mixed signal about which regulations have a priority."
Proposition 203 prohibits discrimination by employers when hiring,
terminating or setting conditions of employment for those who hold
cards saying they can legally use marijuana for medical purposes. And
it's no longer enough for an employee to test positive. It's up to the
employer to prove the employee is impaired by the drug.
That raises a number of concerns about workplace safety, Rosevear
said, for example those who drive or operate equipment as part of their job.
"I don't even want the guy making my pizza to be under the influence,"
he said. "And what about the guy wiring your house?"
The continued safety of students and staff in schools after the law
takes effect next year is a big concern for Yuma County School
Superintendent Tom Tyree.
"Now we are going to have to be very aware of anyone who may have to
be on medical marijuana," he said.
The school districts will need to look at the possibility of
implementing a policy that allows for administration to be notified
about which individuals are using the drug, he noted.
The law states that any person using medical marijuana is not
authorized to use the drug on a school bus or on the grounds of any
preschool, primary or secondary school. However, because of the
varying duration of time it may take for the marijuana metabolites to
leave a person's system, it could be difficult to regulate, he said.
Yuma-area superintendents met Monday to discuss this issue along with
many others.
The general consensus of the discussion was that with the
proposition's passage, they must now look into the details of the law
and seek direction from the Arizona School Boards Association as well
as their district attorneys while ultimately sustaining their main
concern: the safety of their students and staff.
"Now the work begins to figure out what policies may need to be
implemented or what existing policies need to be adjusted," Tyree
said, noting that will require extensive study of the law.
"I hope that what this does not do is lead to a greater use of
marijuana in Arizona illegally," he concluded.
Long before the final vote was counted, the city of Yuma Community
Development Department had started the zoning review process in case
Proposition 203 became law.
"They're been working on it ... they're in the development process,"
said Dave Nash, city spokesman.
But it's way too early to say what form a measure may take, he said.
And it won't happen quickly.
The key thing, Nash said, is that the final measure include all the
"appropriate items ... the most comprehensive plan possible under the
city's jurisdiction."
There also will be several opportunities for the public to weigh in on
the draft measure, he said. Both the city's Planning and Zoning
Commission, where the measure will go first for review, and the Yuma
City Council will hold public hearings before it is adopted.
Visit www.azsos.gov/election/2010/info/PubPamphlet/english/prop203.htm
for more information about the law.
Confirmation over the weekend that voters by a narrow margin approved
the legal use of marijuana for those with chronic or debilitating
medical conditions begs the question about the new law's impact on
local schools, businesses and municipalities.
"From what I've read, it appears it could be a huge problem for
employers," said Ken Rosevear, executive director of the Yuma County
Chamber of Commerce. "Certain rights are given to individuals that
preclude the normal rules and policies businesses live by. It
certainly sends a mixed signal about which regulations have a priority."
Proposition 203 prohibits discrimination by employers when hiring,
terminating or setting conditions of employment for those who hold
cards saying they can legally use marijuana for medical purposes. And
it's no longer enough for an employee to test positive. It's up to the
employer to prove the employee is impaired by the drug.
That raises a number of concerns about workplace safety, Rosevear
said, for example those who drive or operate equipment as part of their job.
"I don't even want the guy making my pizza to be under the influence,"
he said. "And what about the guy wiring your house?"
The continued safety of students and staff in schools after the law
takes effect next year is a big concern for Yuma County School
Superintendent Tom Tyree.
"Now we are going to have to be very aware of anyone who may have to
be on medical marijuana," he said.
The school districts will need to look at the possibility of
implementing a policy that allows for administration to be notified
about which individuals are using the drug, he noted.
The law states that any person using medical marijuana is not
authorized to use the drug on a school bus or on the grounds of any
preschool, primary or secondary school. However, because of the
varying duration of time it may take for the marijuana metabolites to
leave a person's system, it could be difficult to regulate, he said.
Yuma-area superintendents met Monday to discuss this issue along with
many others.
The general consensus of the discussion was that with the
proposition's passage, they must now look into the details of the law
and seek direction from the Arizona School Boards Association as well
as their district attorneys while ultimately sustaining their main
concern: the safety of their students and staff.
"Now the work begins to figure out what policies may need to be
implemented or what existing policies need to be adjusted," Tyree
said, noting that will require extensive study of the law.
"I hope that what this does not do is lead to a greater use of
marijuana in Arizona illegally," he concluded.
Long before the final vote was counted, the city of Yuma Community
Development Department had started the zoning review process in case
Proposition 203 became law.
"They're been working on it ... they're in the development process,"
said Dave Nash, city spokesman.
But it's way too early to say what form a measure may take, he said.
And it won't happen quickly.
The key thing, Nash said, is that the final measure include all the
"appropriate items ... the most comprehensive plan possible under the
city's jurisdiction."
There also will be several opportunities for the public to weigh in on
the draft measure, he said. Both the city's Planning and Zoning
Commission, where the measure will go first for review, and the Yuma
City Council will hold public hearings before it is adopted.
Visit www.azsos.gov/election/2010/info/PubPamphlet/english/prop203.htm
for more information about the law.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...