CAN MEXICO BE SAVED?

The Mayor of Juarez - the Border Town at the Center of the Drug Wars - Says He's Not Getting Enough Help From His Capital, or Washington Either.

Cuidad Juarez, Mexico - 'I can't imagine how the U.S. can be so worried about Iraq and
Pakistan while we don't sense that it is worried about the border
here. We are together whether we like it or not."

So says Hector "Teto" Murguia, the mayor of this city that is plagued
by drug-war disorder. In the 35 months since Mexican President Felipe
Calderon launched his war against his country's drug cartels, more
than 7,100 people have been killed in this border city. Over 2,700
have died since January-in other words, the rate of the killing has
increased.

Carjacking, kidnapping and extortion are rampant. Going out to work,
school, or a restaurant or even to visit friends has become a risky
proposition. Recently, a 20-year-old mother who attends college in
Juarez became chief of police in a nearby town of 9,000 because no one
else would take the job. Many Americans who used to pop over the
border for dining or entertainment have curtailed their visits.
Hundreds of thousands of juarenes have fled, some just over the Rio
Grande to El Paso, Texas, others to the interior of Mexico.

But the 57-year-old Mr. Murguia is staying. Even before he took office
on Oct. 10, a welcoming committee was already at work: In the week
before he won the election, a headless body was dropped on the road
near his home.

So what's his plan to retake the city for law-abiding Mexicans? I have
come here from El Paso, with an armed escort, to find out. As the SUV
I'm riding in turns down his street, I note a new two-story shopping
mall on the corner. It is completely vacant, a metaphor for a
once-promising metropolis laid low by violence and fear.

A tall metal sculpture of Don Quixote decorates Mr. Murguia's foyer.
As I enter his home office, the first thing I ask is why he ran for
this job. He says that his party asked him to run again (he was mayor
from 2004 to 2007), and he felt an obligation to the community.

Cleaning up the mess here will require the proper diagnosis, and I ask
the mayor to share his. "If you have the biggest consumer of drugs
just beside your [border] and you have a lot of people here who have
no opportunity, you have the culture for insecurity," he tells me. But
the mayor doesn't dwell on what he cannot change. Instead he zeroes in
on Mexico. "The real causes that are generating the insecurity in
Juarez and all over Mexico are lack of opportunity, lack of education,
lack of [necessities], impunity, lack of justice. It is a mixture of a
lot of problems where we Mexicans haven't done our homework," he says.

"People who think they are going to fix [the problem] with policemen
and arms are completely crazy." Instead, he wants to see Mexico "make
the changes in the fiscal policies to encourage investments that
create jobs."

To capture the desperation of Mexico's young, the mayor-elect shares
an anecdote: "Last week, at a gas station here, I met an 18-year-old.
He told me 'Teto, you politicians don't know anything. You don't
understand that without hope we have no future. We prefer to die in
one year standing up than living all our lives on our knees.'" Summing
it up, Mr. Murguia says, "When people lose hope they will do anything
[to improve their circumstances]."

By Mr. Murguia's measure, Juarez was a place of hope not so long ago.
"Juarez for 40 years, from 1965-2005, was the city that generated the
most jobs per capita in all of Mexico. And those jobs were not only
for juarenses," he says proudly. "People came from Oaxaca, Zacatecas,
Veracruz because they couldn't find jobs in their own city. Some of
them tried to cross the river but a lot of them found a job in Juarez."

What went wrong? The mayor-elect blames Mexico's revenue sharing
model. "The investment that the federal and state government makes in
Juarez does not correspond to what the city sends in federal taxes."
He complains that though the city created jobs for the nation,
investments in "public services, streets, schools, parks, community
centers and health-care centers haven't corresponded to the job
growth. We were forgotten." He wants the federal government and the
state "to return to Juarez what they owe us."

Of course economic development is unlikely when investors are having
their throats slit. When I raise that issue and the issue of
corruption, Mr. Murguia says that part of what Juarez is owed is
resources for law enforcement. He says that when he first took office
as mayor in 2004 there were only 1,000 police for the entire city. He
raised that number to 1,600 and increased police salaries by more than
50%. But he says that is far from what is needed.

"Experts in crime prevention say Juarez needs 7,000 police. Yet even
if I had used the entire budget I couldn't even have hired 3,000. We
couldn't give them scholarships for their kids and they didn't have
housing. I visited some of them at their homes and saw the dirt
floors. . . . We ask our police to give their lives for us and we
don't have enough money to pay them properly."

A complicating factor is that Mr. Murguia's political adversaries have
accused him of having ties to drug traffickers, since a high-ranking
member of his police department during his last term was busted. When
I raise this, the mayor-elect is ready and rattles off his former
subordinate's resume as a pillar of society and business. "And let me
tell you something else," he adds. "During the six months he worked
for me he received two recognitions from U.S. authorities." In other
words, this official did not have the socioeconomic profile of a cop
on the beat, which suggests that higher salaries alone don't prevent
corruption.

Nevertheless, Mr. Murguia says that what Juarez needs is more
resources-"money, intelligence and cooperation"-from Mexico City. He
also complains that the U.S. aid program for fighting the cartels,
known as Plan Merida, has so far provided "nothing" to his city.

Isn't that a problem to take up with the Mexican government and Mr.
Calderon? "But it's 2,000 kilometers from here," he exclaims. El Paso,
on the other hand, is just across the river, so Washington should
convince Mr. Calderon to help Juarez. "If the Mexican institutions-the
federal police, the army, the federal government, and the municipal
and state governments-fail Juarez," he warns, "everybody is going to
fail. What can a small powerless mayor of Juarez do if President
Calderon doesn't provide the support?"

Mr. Murguia says his city is demoralized. It no longer has just an
organized crime problem, but widespread chaos. "Copy cats" and
youngsters have learned to take advantage of the general breakdown of
law and order. "For kids, 15 or 17 years old, when there is a lot of
impunity, it is very easy for them to extort a business. But this is
not organized crime." Mr. Murguia draws a distinction between the two
and says, "If we can solve the extortions and kidnappings, Juarez will
begin to [improve] slowly." Hence his emphasis on social services,
investment and strengthening of the police.

Mexican politicians are notorious for anti-American rhetoric, but Mr.
Murguia displays no such prejudice with me. Still, he doesn't shy away
from the unpleasant reality of American drug use and
marijuana-growing. When I ask him about legalizing marijuana, he
launches into a favorite Mexican jeremiad: "How do you explain to a
guy here who is in jail because he was caught carrying two kilos of
marijuana that California is producing 10,000 kilograms per day in
just one [facility]? How do you explain that [the Mexican] loses his
liberty while Californians produce? It's hard to explain that to the
people who are in jail here. Fair? It is not fair."

Is he saying, I ask, that there is a perception in Mexico that
marijuana is already legal in the United States? "Yes, oh yes," he
tells me. He makes clear that he thinks the stuff is bad for you, but
he says that any move to legalize it must be done on both sides of the
border-and all over the world. "Otherwise you will get Hell's Kitchen
here in Mexico."

I press him on that point, asking whether legalization, on both sides
of the border, would stop the bloodshed and disintegration of the
state. If you want to end the violence and corruption it creates, he
says, you only need to turn the business over to governments. He says
that he could then deal with the extortion and kidnapping epidemics
separately.

I ask Mr. Murguia whether he thinks winning in Juarez will mean no
more drugs will go into the U.S. "I don't think so," he says. So you
are fighting a problem and risking your life, and if you win you won't
solve the problem?

He repeats his doubts, but for him that's beside the point. "I'm not
going to get philosophical," he says. "The only thing I want to do is
get my city calm."