POTENTIALS OF CANNABIS PLANT UNDERMINE FEAR OF CORRUPTION

Opposition to Marajuana Use Proves Unfounded on Economic and Social Grounds

Marijuana should never have been illegal. There are many within the
toking community who choose to devalue the significance of Prop 19
because marijuana is already accessible to people with a medical
recommendation, but I believe these people fail to perceive the larger
potential of the cannabis organism. The cannabis plant has more value
to humanity than simply making us feel good. Hemp, the male
counterpart to the female marijuana flower, is the key to America's
industrial prosperity for life in the 21st century.

For every beginning there is an end, especially for prohibition of
marijuana. I suspect there are many voters who are ambivalent
regarding the legalization of cannabis, either because of their
present success within the marijuana market or because of their fear
of the 'corporatization' of production within the marijuana market,
but there are benefits from accepting this plant that merit closer
inspection of its legalization. California has some of the most
fertile farming ground on the continent, and to abuse such a potential
privilege to grow premium Californian hemp in such a time of regional
economic strife is mindless ignorance.

There are many sober birds and alcohol enthusiasts who like to attack
the competency of the average American cannabis smoker. These people
are brainwashed. Let's break it down: cannabis was made illegal by
stealth methods and the reasons used to ban it consisted of complete
nonsense. In fact, the medical professionals and industrial farmers of
the day mostly had no idea that the 'rampant drug marijuana' was the
same plant species, Cannabis sativa, which they had been reaping for
fiber and medicine for centuries. If we are to repeal marijuana
prohibition, we must understand how prohibition began.

Let's start with some Halloween-themed bullshit.

The first 'drug czar' Harry J. Anslinger said: "If the hideous monster
Frankenstein came face to face with the monster marihuana, he would
drop dead of fright." That's just some stupid shit. Some have
criticized me for comparing Al Capone to the Mexican drug cartels. I
would smoke a thousand spliffs before backing down on this point:
nearly 30,000 have been killed by border drug gangs since 2007, while
the 1933 repeal of alcohol prohibition was prompted by the death of
seven people. Any philosophical comparison that regards Al Capone as a
greater threat to American life than the bordering Mexican drug
cartels is ridiculous.

The humans who psychologically enforce the prohibition of marijuana
enjoy joking about the consumers of marijuana as if they are stupid
due to their inebriation. The fact is, alcohol degrades intelligence
far more than marijuana does. And the psychological effects of
cannabis are so mild that for it to remain unwelcome within the
commercial sphere simply does not make sense.

Other moronic comments by our first 'drug czar' Anslinger include
"Narcotic effects are good or bad. Marihuana effects run in one
direction only, and that is bad. Marihuana weakens the will." Guess
what, ghost of Harry Anslinger, I'm apt to respect the dead, but once
more your words are just retarded. If smoking marijuana was an
impairment to the human will then I surely would not be the author of
this column.

Californians are not the only ones wondering about the effects of Prop
19's marijuana-legalizing passage. President of Columbia Juan Manuel
Santos recently wondered "If all we are doing is sending our citizens
to prison while elsewhere drugs are legalized, we must ask ourselves:
Isn't it time to revise the global strategy against drugs?" I could
not agree more; the entire world could afford to legalize marijuana.

The arguments against us are weak: pot is in reality safe for
everyone. Opponents claim that the increasing potency of cannabis is
bad; but would you expect computer chip manufacturers to maintain the
exact same computing potential forever? Not at all -- any rational
market demands increasing performance from a product over time. Maybe
I'm just an inebriated university student, but to me this logic seems
fucking infantile.

The evil associated with marijuana has always been a figment of the
imagination; the truth of this is implicit in Anslinger's initial 1937
condemnations: "How many murders, suicides, robberies, criminal
assaults, holdups, burglaries and deeds of maniacal insanity
[cannabis] causes each year, especially among the young, can be only
conjectured. ... No one knows, when he places a marijuana cigarette to
his lips, whether he will become a philosopher, a joyous reveler in a
musical heaven, a mad insensate, a calm philosopher or a murderer."
Guess what, mister Anslinger, not only did cannabis cure my migraines,
but it increased my capacity to be a joyous reveling philosopher, and
I'm saying that your existence was ultimately worthless.

If getting high is a sin, then I'll see mister Anslinger in
Hell.

If reality is definable and the input of my senses means anything,
then I'll continue ignoring the empty advice of hateful people while
I'm chilling on clouds living in Heaven.