News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Drug Czar Criticizes Prop. 19 As Not 'Helpful' To |
Title: | US CA: Drug Czar Criticizes Prop. 19 As Not 'Helpful' To |
Published On: | 2010-10-21 |
Source: | Los Angeles Times (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2010-10-21 15:00:20 |
DRUG CZAR CRITICIZES PROP. 19 AS NOT 'HELPFUL' TO CALIFORNIA
U.S. Official Says Pot Legalization Is Not the Right Response to the
Drug War's Failure.
The nation's drug czar traveled to California to highlight his
contention that legalizing marijuana is not the answer to a drug war
he acknowledged has not succeeded. Instead, Gil Kerlikowske stressed
what he called a middle way: increased prevention and treatment.
Kerlikowske's stated reason for the drop-in visit Wednesday was an
invitation from the Pasadena Recovery Center to participate in a
round-table with drug treatment specialists that lasted less than
half an hour. Before the event, he spoke to the media about his
opposition to Proposition 19.
"The facts are that this proposition would not be helpful to the
people of California," he said, insisting that it would not solve the
state's budget crisis or reduce Mexican drug violence. He also
dismissed the argument made by proponents that children would have
less access to marijuana if it were regulated, noting that children
can still find alcohol and cigarettes.
"Why do we think that we can suddenly do it with marijuana, which can
be grown in a backyard?" he asked. "I think it's such a false promise."
The Obama administration has cranked up its efforts to defeat the
measure. Last week, U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric Holder said he would
"vigorously enforce" federal narcotics laws, even if voters approved
the measure Nov. 2, and "is considering all available legal and
policy options."
Stephen Gutwillig, state director for the Drug Policy Alliance, said
he was not surprised the drug czar found his way to California. "They
have to fly people in from D.C. with the news flash that the federal
government opposes marijuana," he said. "I'm shocked, shocked."
Kerlikowske also released an analysis showing that 47% of
Californians receiving treatment for marijuana abuse are younger than
18, compared with 28% in the rest of the nation, and that 65% began
using marijuana at 14 or younger, compared with 55% for the rest of
the nation. It's the second time in a week that his office has
highlighted data from previously released reports about drug use
among young people, a critical issue for mothers, who are thought to
be the swing vote.
Gutwillig said the analysis underscores the failure of the drug war.
"Everyone agrees young people should not be smoking pot, and these
statistics the drug czar cites are all the more proof of the failures
of the existing prohibitionist regime. It doesn't work," he said.
"We've driven this enormous market underground and driven young
people into the arms of drug dealers."
The measure would allow Californians who are 21 and older to grow and
possess marijuana. It would also allow cities and counties to approve
marijuana cultivation, sales and taxes.
Kerlikowske, acknowledging that Californians seem to be looking for
other ways to deal with drugs than enforcement, said he has focused
more federal resources on prevention and treatment.
"I know clearly the frustration," he said. "The answer isn't legalization."
U.S. Official Says Pot Legalization Is Not the Right Response to the
Drug War's Failure.
The nation's drug czar traveled to California to highlight his
contention that legalizing marijuana is not the answer to a drug war
he acknowledged has not succeeded. Instead, Gil Kerlikowske stressed
what he called a middle way: increased prevention and treatment.
Kerlikowske's stated reason for the drop-in visit Wednesday was an
invitation from the Pasadena Recovery Center to participate in a
round-table with drug treatment specialists that lasted less than
half an hour. Before the event, he spoke to the media about his
opposition to Proposition 19.
"The facts are that this proposition would not be helpful to the
people of California," he said, insisting that it would not solve the
state's budget crisis or reduce Mexican drug violence. He also
dismissed the argument made by proponents that children would have
less access to marijuana if it were regulated, noting that children
can still find alcohol and cigarettes.
"Why do we think that we can suddenly do it with marijuana, which can
be grown in a backyard?" he asked. "I think it's such a false promise."
The Obama administration has cranked up its efforts to defeat the
measure. Last week, U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric Holder said he would
"vigorously enforce" federal narcotics laws, even if voters approved
the measure Nov. 2, and "is considering all available legal and
policy options."
Stephen Gutwillig, state director for the Drug Policy Alliance, said
he was not surprised the drug czar found his way to California. "They
have to fly people in from D.C. with the news flash that the federal
government opposes marijuana," he said. "I'm shocked, shocked."
Kerlikowske also released an analysis showing that 47% of
Californians receiving treatment for marijuana abuse are younger than
18, compared with 28% in the rest of the nation, and that 65% began
using marijuana at 14 or younger, compared with 55% for the rest of
the nation. It's the second time in a week that his office has
highlighted data from previously released reports about drug use
among young people, a critical issue for mothers, who are thought to
be the swing vote.
Gutwillig said the analysis underscores the failure of the drug war.
"Everyone agrees young people should not be smoking pot, and these
statistics the drug czar cites are all the more proof of the failures
of the existing prohibitionist regime. It doesn't work," he said.
"We've driven this enormous market underground and driven young
people into the arms of drug dealers."
The measure would allow Californians who are 21 and older to grow and
possess marijuana. It would also allow cities and counties to approve
marijuana cultivation, sales and taxes.
Kerlikowske, acknowledging that Californians seem to be looking for
other ways to deal with drugs than enforcement, said he has focused
more federal resources on prevention and treatment.
"I know clearly the frustration," he said. "The answer isn't legalization."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...