LOCAL RULES HAZY FOR POT MEASURE

Carry it, grow it, but don't expect to buy it.

A Nov. 2 ballot measure could legalize marijuana in California, but
even if it passes, Inland Empire residents likely won't to be able to
buy a dime bag at their local 7-11.

Proposition 19, if passed, would make it legal for any California age
21 or older to grow marijuana and carry up to one ounce of it. It
would also allow local jurisdictions to regulate and tax the sale of
pot. Local leaders say that won't happen.

"It's not anything we want for our community," said Redlands Mayor Pat
Gilbreath. "I know that would never happen in my community if I had
anything to say about it."

While Prop. 19 supporters say permitting and taxing marijuana sales
would be an income source for cash-strapped cities and counties, local
leaders say the disagreement between state and federal marijuana laws,
the costs of regulating marijuana sales and their personal beliefs
that marijuana is bad for communities are all reasons not to allow pot
to be bought and sold locally.

"Why would I put this whole mechanism in place to regulate marijuana
sales when I'm not going to get anything from it?" said Fontana Mayor
Frank Scialdone. "We're going to have to put in resources to monitor
this. Where are those resources going to come from?"

Claremont Mayor Linda Elderkin said local governments have been
walking on egg shells for years as they try to stay in line with
federal law - which says marijuana is illegal for everyone - and state
law - which says its OK for people with a prescription. That won't
change if California law opens up marijuana for recreational users.

"On medical marijuana, cities have found themselves squarely between
the state and federal governments, and (Prop. 19) is likely to have
the same impact on us," Elderkin said. "If it passes, all cities will
have to be looking at how to negotiate the deep waters of conflict
between state and federal law."

But beyond their hesitance to allow pot to be bought and sold -
something Prop. 19 allows but does not demand - some local leaders are
against the notion of letting people carry marijuana and grow it
locally - something Prop. 19 would make mandatory.

"If they have it in their backyard, I'm not sure we can zone that
out," Gilbreath said. "But I'd certainly like to try to find a way to
do it."

That, says Prop. 19 supporter Lanny Swerdlow, medical director of a
medical marijuana clinic in Riverside, is dangerous talk that hearkens
back to the ongoing fight between local governments and medical
marijuana advocates.

"There's no doubt in my mind that if Prop. 19 passes, law enforcement
is going to be as ferocious and tenacious in opposing it as they have
been in opposing Prop. 215," Swerdlow said, referring to the 1996
ballot measure that legalized medical marijuana. "If the mayor is
saying she will work to undermine to vote of the people of California,
I think people should have a problem with that."

Though Prop. 215 has been on the books for 14 years, medical marijuana
dispensaries and collectives are banned in San Bernardino, Fontana,
Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Redlands and other local cities.

Swerdlow said medical marijuana advocates weren't well-organized after
Prop. 215 passed, allowing local governments to freely set up rules
that have become the subject of a protracted legal battle.

This time, he said, that won't be the case.

"With 215 we did nothing," he said. "With 19, we've learned from our
mistakes. ... We're going to take the offensive and see to it that
it's enforced."

And despite local leaders' stance, Swerdlow said he thinks many local
cities will allow marijuana to be produced and sold if Prop. 19 passes.

"If Los Angeles allows it, within a few weeks, (local leaders) will
notice the tens of thousands of residents going to L.A. to buy
marijuana legally," he said. "They'll be spending millions and the
county of San Bernardino won't be making a dime. ... I don't think
they'll let that money go simply because they're as pure as the driven
snow."