The Other Dumb War:

MARIJUANA 'PROHIBITION' ON CA'S BALLOT

Since the founding of the Drug Enforcement Administration in 1973, 15
million Americans have been arrested for marijuana.

That is more people than live in California's 25 largest cities
millions more than live in Ohio, Pennsylvania or Illinois.

The DEA has led an aggressive national law enforcement effort that
results in a marijuana arrest every 38 seconds, propelling the U.S.
to become the biggest incarcerator on the planet, housing one out of
four of the world's prisoners.

Despite mass arrests, incarceration and the tearing apart of millions
of families, the war rages on with no end in sight.

Since the DEA's founding, approximately 90 percent of youth have
described marijuana as easy to get in annual federal surveys. It is
easier for young Americans to buy marijuana than it is to buy alcohol
or prescription drugs which are legally regulated and controlled.

Is there any reason to think that millions more arrests - with costs
running into the billions - will win the marijuana war?

Last week every former U.S. DEA head came out against Proposition 19
which would end possession arrests and allow local jurisdictions in
California to make marijuana legal.

No surprise that drug enforcement bureaucrats want to defend their
marijuana enforcement budgets. They even oppose medical marijuana for
people suffering and dying.

But, more important for the voter, this is an opportunity to look at
the big picture. Voters should ask themselves:

Has the marijuana war, with more than 800,000 arrests each year, worked?

Will more arrests stop marijuana?

If not, isn't it time to consider alternatives that could better
control marijuana?

Thankfully, the DEA is not the only law enforcement voice. Recently
the National Black Police Association came out in support of Prop.
19, following a slew of endorsements from unions, faith leaders and the NAACP.

On Monday, simultaneous press conferences will be held at Oakland
City Hall and in West Hollywood Park to announce a letter of
endorsement signed by dozens of law enforcers across California.

Joseph McNamara, former police chief in San Jose, California, and
Kansas City, Missouri, an active member of Law Enforcement Against
Prohibition, describes the marijuana laws as much worse than
ineffective: "they waste valuable police resources and also create a
lucrative black market that funds cartels and criminal gangs with
billions of tax-free dollars."

Federal researchers find marijuana to be safer than many legal drugs,
so why waste precious law enforcement resources on it?

These officers, judges and prosecutors support Proposition 19 because it:

. Stops wasting police on non-violent marijuana offenders and enables
them to focus on preventing violent crime,

. Cuts off funding to violent gangs and drug cartels,

. Reduces marijuana access to children by instituting strict
age-limits and public safety controls,

. Protects the lives of police officers now at risk in the "drug war," and

. Restores mutual respect and good relations between law enforcement
and communities bearing the brunt of the current marijuana laws.

These police views are shared by the California Legislative Analyst
which says Prop 19 would enable California to put the state's police
priorities where they belong saying it "could result in savings to
the state and local governments by reducing the number of marijuana
offenders incarcerated in state prisons and county jails, as well as
the number placed under county probation or state parole supervision.

"These savings could reach several tens of millions of dollars
annually. The county jail savings would be offset to the extent that
jail beds no longer needed for marijuana offenders were used for
other criminals who are now being released early because of a lack of
jail space."

According to proponents, Proposition 19 is a cautious reform that
keeps in mind public safety. It empowers local jurisdictions to
decide whether to bring adult use of marijuana within the law and how
to regulate it.

It maintains strict criminal penalties for driving under the
influence, increases the penalty for providing marijuana to a minor,
expressly prohibits consumption in public, forbids smoking while
minors are present, and bans possession on school grounds.

In addition to being good policy that sets common sense police
priorities and regulates marijuana so it is more difficult for
children to get, it will generate $1.4 billion in tax revenue each
year, according to California's tax collector, the Board of Equalization.

The opposition by the federal drug enforcement bureaucrats reminds
California's voters that - despite the drug warriors' best efforts
over nearly four decades - the marijuana war cannot be won and that
voters now have an opportunity to do what politicians have refused to
do: tax and control marijuana.