News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Landmark 'Pot vs Anaheim' Appeal to Set Precedent This |
Title: | US CA: Landmark 'Pot vs Anaheim' Appeal to Set Precedent This |
Published On: | 2010-07-14 |
Source: | East Bay Express (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2010-07-16 15:01:41 |
LANDMARK 'POT VS ANAHEIM' APPEAL TO SET PRECEDENT THIS WEEK
California's balkanized approach to medical marijuana can mean profits
or jail depending on where a patient lives. The most restrictive
cities like Anaheim, Calif., have re-criminalized the drug, thereby
setting up an appeals court showdown scheduled to end some time in the
next seven days.
The California's 4th Appellate District Division Three will issue its
opinion of 'Qualified Patients vs. Anaheim' by July 19th, capping a
years-long appeal watched by thousands of patients, politicians,
lawyers, and press. Qualified Patients' lawyer Anthony Curiale says
cities cannot make growing and distributing medical marijuana illegal,
because Prop 215 and SB420 took away the criminal penalties for doing
so.
If the three-judge appellate court sides with Qualified Patients, and
their reasoning is sound, it could set precedent used by lawyers
across the state in battleground cities like Los Angeles, Costa Mesa,
and San Jose. Anaheim City Attorney Moses W. Johnson said the city's
ban has already stood up once in a trial court, and if it loses on
appeal, Anaheim could take it to the state Supreme Court.
The appellate court could also rule in favor of Qualified Patients,
but issue an unpublished opinion inapplicable to other cities, says
Oakland lawyer Joseph Elford, counsel for Americans for Safe Access.
"We're hoping it'll be a bellwether case, but there's no guarantee."
If Qualified Patients' appeal fails, California would simply become
even more balkanized, says Curiale, with hard-line cities like San
Leandro sending even more consumer dollars to cities like Oakland that
tax and regulate the $14 billion a year agricultural product.
California's balkanized approach to medical marijuana can mean profits
or jail depending on where a patient lives. The most restrictive
cities like Anaheim, Calif., have re-criminalized the drug, thereby
setting up an appeals court showdown scheduled to end some time in the
next seven days.
The California's 4th Appellate District Division Three will issue its
opinion of 'Qualified Patients vs. Anaheim' by July 19th, capping a
years-long appeal watched by thousands of patients, politicians,
lawyers, and press. Qualified Patients' lawyer Anthony Curiale says
cities cannot make growing and distributing medical marijuana illegal,
because Prop 215 and SB420 took away the criminal penalties for doing
so.
If the three-judge appellate court sides with Qualified Patients, and
their reasoning is sound, it could set precedent used by lawyers
across the state in battleground cities like Los Angeles, Costa Mesa,
and San Jose. Anaheim City Attorney Moses W. Johnson said the city's
ban has already stood up once in a trial court, and if it loses on
appeal, Anaheim could take it to the state Supreme Court.
The appellate court could also rule in favor of Qualified Patients,
but issue an unpublished opinion inapplicable to other cities, says
Oakland lawyer Joseph Elford, counsel for Americans for Safe Access.
"We're hoping it'll be a bellwether case, but there's no guarantee."
If Qualified Patients' appeal fails, California would simply become
even more balkanized, says Curiale, with hard-line cities like San
Leandro sending even more consumer dollars to cities like Oakland that
tax and regulate the $14 billion a year agricultural product.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...