News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: PUB LTE: NPD Must Stop Bylaw Silliness |
Title: | CN BC: PUB LTE: NPD Must Stop Bylaw Silliness |
Published On: | 2010-05-31 |
Source: | Nelson Daily News (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2010-06-02 15:02:08 |
NPD MUST STOP BYLAW SILLINESS
Dear Editor,
I wish I found it hard to believe that our city council and police
department are willing to openly violate the Charter rights of the
people of our town. But, even though the B.C. Court of Appeals ruled
that these electrical inspection by-laws violate our section 8
charter rights, they plan on pushing forward with their own plans for
this type of bylaw.
Not only that but they plan on putting our firefighters and building
inspectors into the role that should be filled by the police who have
the proper training.
I wonder how they feel about being put into situations where they
will be threatened and or assaulted.
According to the article in the NDN May 27, 2010 that's the only time
the police will get involved with these inspections.
Finally, knowledge is power.
I have read this unanimous decision from the Court of Appeals. (While
the impugned inspections in this case are regulatory in nature, they
constitute a considerable intrusion into an individual's reasonable
expectation of privacy.
While there is a requirement under s. 19.3(1) of the SSA that there
be "reasonable grounds" for an inspection, this requirement is not
sufficient to render the searches reasonable under s. 8. An
administrative warrant is feasible, serves a beneficial function, and
should be required.
Requiring an administrative warrant in these circumstances protects
the individual's expectation of privacy, and it does so without
undermining the public interest in public safety. To obtain an
administrative warrant it will be necessary to show that "reasonable
grounds" exist to believe that permit conditions, or codes or
standards established by regulation, are not being complied with.
This Court's decision in Bichel stands for the narrow proposition
that in the regulatory context of a minimally intrusive spot-check
search in which a warrant would serve no function, a warrant is not required.
Accordingly, Bichel is of limited application on this appeal.) What
this means is, they will need Probable Cause to obtain an
Administrative Warrant to enter your premises, without it you can
refuse them access to your Home. I give this information to the
citizens of Nelson so they may protect their rights where others
would violate them.
Philip McMillan,
Nelson, B.C.
Dear Editor,
I wish I found it hard to believe that our city council and police
department are willing to openly violate the Charter rights of the
people of our town. But, even though the B.C. Court of Appeals ruled
that these electrical inspection by-laws violate our section 8
charter rights, they plan on pushing forward with their own plans for
this type of bylaw.
Not only that but they plan on putting our firefighters and building
inspectors into the role that should be filled by the police who have
the proper training.
I wonder how they feel about being put into situations where they
will be threatened and or assaulted.
According to the article in the NDN May 27, 2010 that's the only time
the police will get involved with these inspections.
Finally, knowledge is power.
I have read this unanimous decision from the Court of Appeals. (While
the impugned inspections in this case are regulatory in nature, they
constitute a considerable intrusion into an individual's reasonable
expectation of privacy.
While there is a requirement under s. 19.3(1) of the SSA that there
be "reasonable grounds" for an inspection, this requirement is not
sufficient to render the searches reasonable under s. 8. An
administrative warrant is feasible, serves a beneficial function, and
should be required.
Requiring an administrative warrant in these circumstances protects
the individual's expectation of privacy, and it does so without
undermining the public interest in public safety. To obtain an
administrative warrant it will be necessary to show that "reasonable
grounds" exist to believe that permit conditions, or codes or
standards established by regulation, are not being complied with.
This Court's decision in Bichel stands for the narrow proposition
that in the regulatory context of a minimally intrusive spot-check
search in which a warrant would serve no function, a warrant is not required.
Accordingly, Bichel is of limited application on this appeal.) What
this means is, they will need Probable Cause to obtain an
Administrative Warrant to enter your premises, without it you can
refuse them access to your Home. I give this information to the
citizens of Nelson so they may protect their rights where others
would violate them.
Philip McMillan,
Nelson, B.C.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...