News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: Drug-Sniffing Dogs at School Are 'Illegal': Critics |
Title: | CN BC: Drug-Sniffing Dogs at School Are 'Illegal': Critics |
Published On: | 2010-05-10 |
Source: | Vancouver Sun (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2010-05-14 01:44:42 |
DRUG-SNIFFING DOGS AT SCHOOL ARE 'ILLEGAL': CRITICS
B.C. Civil Liberties Association Boss Says the Practice of Randomly
Searching Student Lockers Is a Violation of Charter Privacy Rights
Using drug-sniffing dogs to randomly search student lockers at
Abbotsford schools is a violation of Charter privacy rights and is
illegal, according to David Eby, the executive director of the B.C.
Civil Liberties Association.
"They don't need a warrant ... but they still need reasonable grounds
to believe the students have broken school rules, because the school
is still government and the students are still citizens," he said.
Eby suggested the policy also shows an appalling lack of respect to
children, and highlights the failure of the Abbotsford School District
and parents to properly educate children about the dangers of drug
use.
"If the only responsibility of the Abbotsford school board with
respect to students was eliminating potential liability issues around
the school, that would be one thing. But their job is actually education."
An adjunct professor of law at the University of B.C., Eby said all
the drug-sniffing dogs in the world won't prevent kids from doing drugs.
"In terms of combating drugs in schools, the most effective technique
is going to be education, because as soon as they leave the school
grounds ... they are going to be exposed to drugs and the opportunity
to use and purchase drugs."
When asked if any drugs had been found in Abbotsford schools using the
dogs, Abbotsford Board of Education chair Cindy Schafer was unsure and
said measuring the effectiveness of a policy of this type is
problematic at best.
"Our goal is we want to keep schools safe, to measure whether or not
that's been effective yet, I don't know how we could measure that,"
she said.
With budget concerns, cutbacks and possible school closures looming
over many school districts, Schafer said the price of implementing the
policy is negligible.
"This year the cost was $6,500," she said, "In a district of our size,
the cost is minimal."
Vancouver school board communications manager David Weir said the
board has never employed sniffer dogs, and has no plans on
implementing them.
Instead, schools employ Vancouver police officers as liaisons who are
a regular hallway presence.
"We do not use [dogs] in our schools, and we are not aware of any
conversations or requests for us to consider using them," he said.
Margrett Donley is the owner of Canadian K9 Detection Security &
Investigations Ltd., a Vancouver company contracted by the Abbotsford
Board of Education to perform the drug sweeps.
Donley said searches of this type are proactive, and the dogs are more
than 90 per cent accurate.
"This is not searching for criminals, that's not what this is
about.
"This is about protecting our children," Donley said.
Parents and students like the idea of being protected, said Donley,
regardless if the criminals do, in fact, turn out to be children and
youth.
"There is not a child I have met in my life -- that goes out to be a
drug dealer or a drug mule -- that decides one day that that is what
they are going to do," she said.
"They're influenced to do it." Eby thinks the tactics go too
far.
"I don't know what stage we've got to, where we are using
drug-sniffing dogs on our own children.
"It's a failure of drug policy and a failure of drug education among
youth," he said.
In matters of safety, school authorities must be afforded a broad
measure of discretion, Sgt. Mike Novakowski with the Abbotsford police
said.
"Schools are a microcosm of a community. What happens in homes and on
streets will, at some level, find its way into our schools.
"The use of drug-sniffer dogs is one tool to assist school authorities
in ferreting out [drugs]," Novakowski said.
Schafer said the school board has received no feedback on the policy
from parents or students.
"We actually haven't heard anything."
The board did due diligence in implementing the policy, Schafer
said.
"You can't deny that in our community there are some things that have
been problematic. Drugs is one of them, and gangs.
"We just want the message to get out there that we do not want the
sharing and trafficking of drugs at school."
B.C. Civil Liberties Association Boss Says the Practice of Randomly
Searching Student Lockers Is a Violation of Charter Privacy Rights
Using drug-sniffing dogs to randomly search student lockers at
Abbotsford schools is a violation of Charter privacy rights and is
illegal, according to David Eby, the executive director of the B.C.
Civil Liberties Association.
"They don't need a warrant ... but they still need reasonable grounds
to believe the students have broken school rules, because the school
is still government and the students are still citizens," he said.
Eby suggested the policy also shows an appalling lack of respect to
children, and highlights the failure of the Abbotsford School District
and parents to properly educate children about the dangers of drug
use.
"If the only responsibility of the Abbotsford school board with
respect to students was eliminating potential liability issues around
the school, that would be one thing. But their job is actually education."
An adjunct professor of law at the University of B.C., Eby said all
the drug-sniffing dogs in the world won't prevent kids from doing drugs.
"In terms of combating drugs in schools, the most effective technique
is going to be education, because as soon as they leave the school
grounds ... they are going to be exposed to drugs and the opportunity
to use and purchase drugs."
When asked if any drugs had been found in Abbotsford schools using the
dogs, Abbotsford Board of Education chair Cindy Schafer was unsure and
said measuring the effectiveness of a policy of this type is
problematic at best.
"Our goal is we want to keep schools safe, to measure whether or not
that's been effective yet, I don't know how we could measure that,"
she said.
With budget concerns, cutbacks and possible school closures looming
over many school districts, Schafer said the price of implementing the
policy is negligible.
"This year the cost was $6,500," she said, "In a district of our size,
the cost is minimal."
Vancouver school board communications manager David Weir said the
board has never employed sniffer dogs, and has no plans on
implementing them.
Instead, schools employ Vancouver police officers as liaisons who are
a regular hallway presence.
"We do not use [dogs] in our schools, and we are not aware of any
conversations or requests for us to consider using them," he said.
Margrett Donley is the owner of Canadian K9 Detection Security &
Investigations Ltd., a Vancouver company contracted by the Abbotsford
Board of Education to perform the drug sweeps.
Donley said searches of this type are proactive, and the dogs are more
than 90 per cent accurate.
"This is not searching for criminals, that's not what this is
about.
"This is about protecting our children," Donley said.
Parents and students like the idea of being protected, said Donley,
regardless if the criminals do, in fact, turn out to be children and
youth.
"There is not a child I have met in my life -- that goes out to be a
drug dealer or a drug mule -- that decides one day that that is what
they are going to do," she said.
"They're influenced to do it." Eby thinks the tactics go too
far.
"I don't know what stage we've got to, where we are using
drug-sniffing dogs on our own children.
"It's a failure of drug policy and a failure of drug education among
youth," he said.
In matters of safety, school authorities must be afforded a broad
measure of discretion, Sgt. Mike Novakowski with the Abbotsford police
said.
"Schools are a microcosm of a community. What happens in homes and on
streets will, at some level, find its way into our schools.
"The use of drug-sniffer dogs is one tool to assist school authorities
in ferreting out [drugs]," Novakowski said.
Schafer said the school board has received no feedback on the policy
from parents or students.
"We actually haven't heard anything."
The board did due diligence in implementing the policy, Schafer
said.
"You can't deny that in our community there are some things that have
been problematic. Drugs is one of them, and gangs.
"We just want the message to get out there that we do not want the
sharing and trafficking of drugs at school."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...