Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: DA Candidates Court Medical Marijuana Advocates
Title:US CA: DA Candidates Court Medical Marijuana Advocates
Published On:2010-04-29
Source:Press Democrat, The (Santa Rosa, CA)
Fetched On:2010-04-29 23:16:49
DA CANDIDATES COURT MEDICAL MARIJUANA ADVOCATES

The contentious race for Sonoma County district attorney took a
mellower tone Wednesday night as the two candidates assured a room of
medical marijuana advocates they would not step up prosecution of
qualified patients.

Two-term incumbent Stephan Passalacqua and challenger Jill Ravitch
agreed to support existing law that allows medically prescribed
cultivation and possession. They also said they would honor any new
legislation that would open marijuana use to adults 21 or older.

"I understand there is a place for it and understand the law requires
safe access in our community," Ravitch said during the candidates'
fourth debate at the downtown Santa Rosa library.

Passalacqua told the crowd of more than 100 people that he knows
"first-hand" that medical marijuana works and would continue a policy
of not pursuing jury trials against people with valid doctor recommendations.

"We're going to continue to give the benefit of the doubt to
qualified patients," Passalacqua said.

Both candidates gave more nuanced answers about their views on pot
collectives, the return of seized marijuana and the expected November
ballot initiative that would tax and legalize small amounts of pot
for all adults.

Currently in Sonoma County, people with a doctor's recommendation may
possess up to three pounds of marijuana and grow up to 30 plants.

The Tax Cannabis initiative headed for the November election would
allow an ounce for people over 21 and limited cultivation.

Under questioning from co-hosts with the Sonoma Alliance for Medical
Marijuana and Americans for Safe Access, the two candidates were
asked if they support its passage and what changes they would envision.

Passalacqua said the initiative seemed well-intentioned but posed
problems for public safety because it leaves regulation to local
authorities. Also, he said it would complicate practices for
employers who receive federal money under drug-free workplace policies.

"That would be problematic," Passalacqua said.

Ravitch said even with its passage, marijuana would remain illegal
under federal law. In addition, she said there would still be
vagueness about distribution.

Neither candidate would say how they would vote on the initiative but
agreed to support the outcome.

Both agreed legalization would free up resources to concentrate on
more pressing concerns, like gangs and domestic violence.

"It's going to completely change the law enforcement arena,"
Passalacqua said. "We won't be prosecuting these cases."

On other questions, like the issue of returning seized property after
charges are dismissed, the candidates responded they had no
jurisdiction. It it up to law enforcement to do that, they said.

Ravitch, currently a prosecutor in pot-rich Mendocino County, said
she would object to the release of contraband in cases involving
illegal guns or other violence. But where possible, she said she
favors the return.

Both vowed to continue an open dialogue with medical pot users and
grant immunity from prosecution to those who follow the law.
Member Comments
No member comments available...