News (Media Awareness Project) - US SC: Editorial: SC Needs Sentencing Reform |
Title: | US SC: Editorial: SC Needs Sentencing Reform |
Published On: | 2010-04-14 |
Source: | Post and Courier, The (Charleston, SC) |
Fetched On: | 2010-04-20 19:53:18 |
SC NEEDS SENTENCING REFORM
People without children might not care so much about public education
(although they should).
And people who have solid jobs might not be so distressed about
unemployment (although they should be, too).
But everyone in South Carolina is vulnerable to crime -- from a
stolen bicycle to a drive-by shooting. And everyone should encourage
the state House of Representatives to vote in favor of a Senate bill
that would reform criminal sentencing.
The comprehensive, bipartisan bill aims to preserve public safety and
reduce crime -- two worthy goals. To do that, it would provide
consistency in sentencing classifications and assign punishments
proportional for the offenses committed.
It would keep violent criminals behind bars, by toughening penalties
for some of the most serious crimes.
But it would manage some not-so-bad lawbreakers, who don't need to
fill beds in the state's dangerously overcrowded prisons, with
community supervision.
The bill, scheduled for discussion in a House judicial subcommittee
today, presumes that a drug user, for example, might become a
productive citizen with appropriate counseling and oversight in the
community. It recognizes that prisons aren't ideal places for
rehabilitation, as the high recidivism rate for inmates attests.
Indeed, about half of the state's prisoners are non-violent
offenders. And 24 percent of all prisoners return to prison -- many
for non-criminal offenses.
If things continue as they are, the Department of Corrections
estimates it will take $317 million to build more prisons to meet the
state's growing needs. This is money the state can ill afford, but
would have to provide for the safety of the public.
With sentencing reform, the existing prisons would be adequate -- and
the state would save money because the cost of community supervision
is a fraction of the cost of incarceration.
The sentencing reform bill would ensure that prisons have room for
the bad guys. The public deserves that security.
It also provides for the best use of public dollars in parceling out
cell space -- something that hard-pressed taxpayers deserve.
People without children might not care so much about public education
(although they should).
And people who have solid jobs might not be so distressed about
unemployment (although they should be, too).
But everyone in South Carolina is vulnerable to crime -- from a
stolen bicycle to a drive-by shooting. And everyone should encourage
the state House of Representatives to vote in favor of a Senate bill
that would reform criminal sentencing.
The comprehensive, bipartisan bill aims to preserve public safety and
reduce crime -- two worthy goals. To do that, it would provide
consistency in sentencing classifications and assign punishments
proportional for the offenses committed.
It would keep violent criminals behind bars, by toughening penalties
for some of the most serious crimes.
But it would manage some not-so-bad lawbreakers, who don't need to
fill beds in the state's dangerously overcrowded prisons, with
community supervision.
The bill, scheduled for discussion in a House judicial subcommittee
today, presumes that a drug user, for example, might become a
productive citizen with appropriate counseling and oversight in the
community. It recognizes that prisons aren't ideal places for
rehabilitation, as the high recidivism rate for inmates attests.
Indeed, about half of the state's prisoners are non-violent
offenders. And 24 percent of all prisoners return to prison -- many
for non-criminal offenses.
If things continue as they are, the Department of Corrections
estimates it will take $317 million to build more prisons to meet the
state's growing needs. This is money the state can ill afford, but
would have to provide for the safety of the public.
With sentencing reform, the existing prisons would be adequate -- and
the state would save money because the cost of community supervision
is a fraction of the cost of incarceration.
The sentencing reform bill would ensure that prisons have room for
the bad guys. The public deserves that security.
It also provides for the best use of public dollars in parceling out
cell space -- something that hard-pressed taxpayers deserve.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...