News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: OPED: Time to Stone a Scared Cow |
Title: | CN BC: OPED: Time to Stone a Scared Cow |
Published On: | 2010-04-13 |
Source: | Nelson Daily News (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2010-04-16 17:05:40 |
TIME TO STONE A SCARED COW
Seventeen per cent of Canadians report having used cannabis in the
past year, despite it being illegal. Prohibition, it seems, is
hardly stopping people from using cannabis.
For perspective, cigarettes are available at every corner store and
the Canadian Cancer Society reports that tobacco use stands at 18 per cent.
When I was in university, one of my favourite people was a Member of
Parliament who represented a very conservative riding yet held very
liberal views on cannabis law reform. On the one hand, he would
maintain that "Your mind is how you experience the world and I can't
see why anyone would allow chemicals to dull the one chance they get
to experience it." But then he would turn on a dime: "Let's be
honest, this government I'm serving can't even keep cannabis out of
prisons. Even in a tiny area guarded with guns, barbed wire, and four
metre high concrete walls, we can't enforce the drug laws. Who here
really thinks we can keep cannabis out of our sparsely populated
country while respecting peoples' privacy and freedom of movement?"
The Price of Prohibition
His comments were reinforced recently when the Saskatchewan media
reported actual examples of governments failing to keep cannabis out
of prisons. This news, given that prisons are purposely designed to
be secure, should prompt us to ask whether we are being rational in
our attempts to prohibit cannabis from an entire country that is the
world's second largest and most sparsely populated. We must further
ask if the "cure" - prohibition - has side effects that are worse
than the drug disease.
The conservative C2C Journal to the neo-Marxist This magazine have
recently published arguments similar to that made by the Member of
Parliament. In a thoughtful C2C article entitled "The Price of Pot
Prohibition," Peter Jaworski gives a picture of the difficulties
inherent in a attempting to prohibit cannabis use.
In fact, a 2002 Senate Special Report found that, in 2006,
authorities seized only 50 tonnes, or six per cent, of an estimated
800 tonnes of cannabis which circulated in Canada, which would seem
to indicate that prohibition is to the cannabis trade as flies are to
elephants: annoying but mostly irrelevant.
But, prohibitionists may maintain, if 17 per cent of Canadians smoke
pot now, imagine if it was legal! Legislation decriminalizing
cannabis use would be an implicit endorsement by the state, and the
problem would get much worse than it is already.
However, the facts say otherwise: In the US, famous for its War on
Drugs and with an estimated half million people in prison for drug
offenses, 12.2 per cent use cannabis, while in the Netherlands, where
people are able to legally buy and smoke cannabis in public, 5.4 per
cent are users.
Further, so long as cannabis is illegal but in common use, an
industry exists in which people can't access the police and court
system for the enforcement of contracts and protection of their
property. You can hardly report to the police that your runner ran
off with your cannabis, or tell a judge that your grower has breached
his contract. As a result, contracts and property rights in the drug
business are enforced in much the same way as they are in the wider
economy of Somalia; by people taking the law into their own hands.
Worse still, the burden of such lawlessness in not evenly spread
across society. While middle-class parents may take some comfort
from knowing that drugs are illegal, it is less well-to-do kids who
are tempted by gangs enjoying the high profits associated with the
dangerous but lucrative business of dealing drugs outside the law.
A Bad Deal
Finally, while economic projections are notoriously inaccurate, the
best ones we have suggest that prohibition is a bad deal. Based on
current usage and values, Jaworski estimates that a tax on legal
cannabis could generate between $1 and $3 billion, plus half a
billion dollars saved from not having to enforce prohibition. For
perspective, raising the GST by one percentage point would raise
about three billion dollars.
Based on work by the Canadian Centre for Substance abuse, the
"social" costs of healthcare and lost productivity from cannabis is
currently estimated at approximately half a billion dollars. While
legislation legalizing cannabis could double usage ( although this
seems unlikely as Canada already has the highest usage rates in the
industrialised world ), the country would still be richer thanks to
the tax revenue and enforcement reductions.
It may just be time to kill the sacred cow of prohibition.
Seventeen per cent of Canadians report having used cannabis in the
past year, despite it being illegal. Prohibition, it seems, is
hardly stopping people from using cannabis.
For perspective, cigarettes are available at every corner store and
the Canadian Cancer Society reports that tobacco use stands at 18 per cent.
When I was in university, one of my favourite people was a Member of
Parliament who represented a very conservative riding yet held very
liberal views on cannabis law reform. On the one hand, he would
maintain that "Your mind is how you experience the world and I can't
see why anyone would allow chemicals to dull the one chance they get
to experience it." But then he would turn on a dime: "Let's be
honest, this government I'm serving can't even keep cannabis out of
prisons. Even in a tiny area guarded with guns, barbed wire, and four
metre high concrete walls, we can't enforce the drug laws. Who here
really thinks we can keep cannabis out of our sparsely populated
country while respecting peoples' privacy and freedom of movement?"
The Price of Prohibition
His comments were reinforced recently when the Saskatchewan media
reported actual examples of governments failing to keep cannabis out
of prisons. This news, given that prisons are purposely designed to
be secure, should prompt us to ask whether we are being rational in
our attempts to prohibit cannabis from an entire country that is the
world's second largest and most sparsely populated. We must further
ask if the "cure" - prohibition - has side effects that are worse
than the drug disease.
The conservative C2C Journal to the neo-Marxist This magazine have
recently published arguments similar to that made by the Member of
Parliament. In a thoughtful C2C article entitled "The Price of Pot
Prohibition," Peter Jaworski gives a picture of the difficulties
inherent in a attempting to prohibit cannabis use.
In fact, a 2002 Senate Special Report found that, in 2006,
authorities seized only 50 tonnes, or six per cent, of an estimated
800 tonnes of cannabis which circulated in Canada, which would seem
to indicate that prohibition is to the cannabis trade as flies are to
elephants: annoying but mostly irrelevant.
But, prohibitionists may maintain, if 17 per cent of Canadians smoke
pot now, imagine if it was legal! Legislation decriminalizing
cannabis use would be an implicit endorsement by the state, and the
problem would get much worse than it is already.
However, the facts say otherwise: In the US, famous for its War on
Drugs and with an estimated half million people in prison for drug
offenses, 12.2 per cent use cannabis, while in the Netherlands, where
people are able to legally buy and smoke cannabis in public, 5.4 per
cent are users.
Further, so long as cannabis is illegal but in common use, an
industry exists in which people can't access the police and court
system for the enforcement of contracts and protection of their
property. You can hardly report to the police that your runner ran
off with your cannabis, or tell a judge that your grower has breached
his contract. As a result, contracts and property rights in the drug
business are enforced in much the same way as they are in the wider
economy of Somalia; by people taking the law into their own hands.
Worse still, the burden of such lawlessness in not evenly spread
across society. While middle-class parents may take some comfort
from knowing that drugs are illegal, it is less well-to-do kids who
are tempted by gangs enjoying the high profits associated with the
dangerous but lucrative business of dealing drugs outside the law.
A Bad Deal
Finally, while economic projections are notoriously inaccurate, the
best ones we have suggest that prohibition is a bad deal. Based on
current usage and values, Jaworski estimates that a tax on legal
cannabis could generate between $1 and $3 billion, plus half a
billion dollars saved from not having to enforce prohibition. For
perspective, raising the GST by one percentage point would raise
about three billion dollars.
Based on work by the Canadian Centre for Substance abuse, the
"social" costs of healthcare and lost productivity from cannabis is
currently estimated at approximately half a billion dollars. While
legislation legalizing cannabis could double usage ( although this
seems unlikely as Canada already has the highest usage rates in the
industrialised world ), the country would still be richer thanks to
the tax revenue and enforcement reductions.
It may just be time to kill the sacred cow of prohibition.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...