Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US SD: Appeals Court Rules Against Pine Ridge Hemp Growing
Title:US SD: Appeals Court Rules Against Pine Ridge Hemp Growing
Published On:2006-05-17
Source:Grand Island Independent (NE)
Fetched On:2008-01-14 04:50:00
APPEALS COURT RULES AGAINST PINE RIDGE HEMP GROWING

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. -- An American Indian treaty and United States law
do not allow for the cultivation of industrial hemp on the Pine Ridge
Indian Reservation, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.

Alex White Plume, vice president of the Oglala Sioux Tribe, and
members of his family planted hemp on their property but it was cut
down and confiscated by federal agents. Industrial hemp is related to
marijuana and is used to make rope and other products. It has only a
trace of the drug in marijuana, but it is illegal to grow hemp in the
United States.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said it empathized with the
White Plumes but concluded their enterprise was illegal. "We are not
unmindful of the challenges faced by members of the Tribe to engage
in sustainable farming on federal trust lands ... And we do not doubt
that there are a countless number of beneficial products which
utilize hemp in some fashion. Nor do we ignore the burdens imposed by
a DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) registration necessary to grow hemp
legally," justices wrote. "But these are policy arguments better
suited for the congressional hearing room than the courtroom."

During oral arguments in December in St. Louis, the White Plumes'
lawyer asked the appeals court to return the matter to a lower court
to consider the legality of their crop. The family tried three times
to grow industrial hemp on Pine Ridge reservation land from 2000 to
2002, only to have the federal government seize and destroy the
plants. A judge ordered the White Plumes to stop the plantings but
they were never charged in criminal court.

The family could have applied to the DEA for permission to grow the
crop, but without that authorization the crop could not be allowed,
argued Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Salter. "The court should be
commended for fulfilling its constitutional role by interpreting an
ambiguous law of Congress," he said Wednesday.

The White Plumes' lawyer, Bruce Ellison of Rapid City, argued the
family was not growing a drug so it didn't need to apply to the
federal government for permission. Ellison said he knew of no
instance when the DEA granted a commercial hemp farming permit. And
he said by treaty and tribal law, the White Plumes had the right to
grow hemp without a DEA permit.

The appeals court disagreed, saying the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868
set a number of provisions to encourage Indian farming but does not
address hemp farming. White Plume and Ellison could not be reached
for comment.

On the Net: http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/06/05/051654P.pdf
Member Comments
No member comments available...