News (Media Awareness Project) - US SC: Judiciary Panel Advances Sentencing Reform Plan |
Title: | US SC: Judiciary Panel Advances Sentencing Reform Plan |
Published On: | 2010-03-24 |
Source: | Post and Courier, The (Charleston, SC) |
Fetched On: | 2010-04-02 11:43:50 |
JUDICIARY PANEL ADVANCES SENTENCING REFORM PLAN
COLUMBIA -- A comprehensive plan to divert nonviolent criminals from
prisons to the probation and parole system so South Carolina can avoid
spending hundreds of millions of dollars to build new prisons was
adopted Tuesday by the Senate Judiciary Committee in a 14-0 vote.
The bill calls for more drug users to serve supervised criminal
sentences in the community as a way to free up beds in the overcrowded
prisons. The measure, as written, deals with future offenders,
although there are a few exceptions to parole some current prisoners.
Sen. Gerald Malloy, a Hartsville Democrat who led research and debate
on the proposals for more than a year, said the legislation is not
"soft on crime" but "smart." For instance, he said that it costs
$14,500 for each inmate in prison compared with
$2,000 for an individual in an intense community supervision
program.
"We're talking about a tremendous amount of savings," Malloy said.
"And the ability to keep South Carolina safe was not compromised. ...
We think this is landmark legislation."
The bill reclassifies 22 crimes as violent, including drunken driving
that results in death. That change will trigger a rule that does not
allow the violent offenders to qualify for parole until they serve 85
percent of their sentences. The bill also provides incentives such as
"good time credits" for people on probation and parole to stay crime-
and drug-free, gives judges more discretion for sentencing drug users,
lets more inmates qualify for work-release and removes the disparity
in sentencing between crack and cocaine possession.
Additionally, the bill would allow for the special parole of inmates
who are terminally ill, geriatric or physically disabled and no longer
pose a public risk. Some legislators raised the possibility of the
early release of up to 3,000 nonviolent criminals as a way to save the
cash-strapped state money, but the Judiciary Committee did not make
those proposals part of the legislation.
Most of the provisions in the bill would become effective in January,
if the bill survives the legislative process. The bill also
establishes an oversight committee made up of legislators and members
of the public to study the results of the law.
Solicitors, public defenders, victim advocates, national researchers
and Jon Ozmint, director of the Department of Corrections, were among
the experts that helped legislators draft the bill.
Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Isle of Palms, acknowledged that the legislation
might require an up-front investment in the probation and parole
system to be sure that those criminals diverted from prisons received
proper oversight, but that's a fight that will be battled out on the
Senate floor. Other issues raised during the committee meeting include
the increase in certain fines during hard economic times and a
provision in the bill that would ban people who served time for a
violent crime from ever owning a gun. Some senators are interested in
banning only violent criminals who used a gun while committing a crime.
"I do think we need to change that," said Campsen, one of the
Legislature's biggest sportsman.
COLUMBIA -- A comprehensive plan to divert nonviolent criminals from
prisons to the probation and parole system so South Carolina can avoid
spending hundreds of millions of dollars to build new prisons was
adopted Tuesday by the Senate Judiciary Committee in a 14-0 vote.
The bill calls for more drug users to serve supervised criminal
sentences in the community as a way to free up beds in the overcrowded
prisons. The measure, as written, deals with future offenders,
although there are a few exceptions to parole some current prisoners.
Sen. Gerald Malloy, a Hartsville Democrat who led research and debate
on the proposals for more than a year, said the legislation is not
"soft on crime" but "smart." For instance, he said that it costs
$14,500 for each inmate in prison compared with
$2,000 for an individual in an intense community supervision
program.
"We're talking about a tremendous amount of savings," Malloy said.
"And the ability to keep South Carolina safe was not compromised. ...
We think this is landmark legislation."
The bill reclassifies 22 crimes as violent, including drunken driving
that results in death. That change will trigger a rule that does not
allow the violent offenders to qualify for parole until they serve 85
percent of their sentences. The bill also provides incentives such as
"good time credits" for people on probation and parole to stay crime-
and drug-free, gives judges more discretion for sentencing drug users,
lets more inmates qualify for work-release and removes the disparity
in sentencing between crack and cocaine possession.
Additionally, the bill would allow for the special parole of inmates
who are terminally ill, geriatric or physically disabled and no longer
pose a public risk. Some legislators raised the possibility of the
early release of up to 3,000 nonviolent criminals as a way to save the
cash-strapped state money, but the Judiciary Committee did not make
those proposals part of the legislation.
Most of the provisions in the bill would become effective in January,
if the bill survives the legislative process. The bill also
establishes an oversight committee made up of legislators and members
of the public to study the results of the law.
Solicitors, public defenders, victim advocates, national researchers
and Jon Ozmint, director of the Department of Corrections, were among
the experts that helped legislators draft the bill.
Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Isle of Palms, acknowledged that the legislation
might require an up-front investment in the probation and parole
system to be sure that those criminals diverted from prisons received
proper oversight, but that's a fight that will be battled out on the
Senate floor. Other issues raised during the committee meeting include
the increase in certain fines during hard economic times and a
provision in the bill that would ban people who served time for a
violent crime from ever owning a gun. Some senators are interested in
banning only violent criminals who used a gun while committing a crime.
"I do think we need to change that," said Campsen, one of the
Legislature's biggest sportsman.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...