FEARFUL OF ALIENATING AFGHANS, U.S. TURNS BLIND EYE TO OPIUM

KABUL, Afghanistan - The effort to win over Afghans on former Taliban
turf in Marja has put American and NATO commanders in the unusual
position of arguing against opium eradication, pitting them against
some Afghan officials who are pushing to destroy the harvest.

From Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal on down, the military's position is
clear: "U.S. forces no longer eradicate," as one NATO official put it.
Opium is the main livelihood of 60 to 70 percent of the farmers in
Marja, which was seized from Taliban rebels in a major offensive last
month. American Marines occupying the area are under orders to leave
the farmers' fields alone.

"Marja is a special case right now," said Cmdr. Jeffrey Eggers, a
member of the general's Strategic Advisory Group, his top advisory
body. "We don't trample the livelihood of those we're trying to win
over."

United Nations drug officials agree with the Americans, though they
acknowledge the conundrum. Pictures of NATO and other allied soldiers
"walking next to the opium fields won't go well with domestic
audiences, but the approach of postponing eradicating in this
particular case is a sensible one," said Jean-Luc Lemahieu, who is in
charge of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime here.

Afghan officials, however, are divided. Though some support the
American position, others, citing a constitutional ban on opium
cultivation, want to plow the fields under before the harvest, which
has already begun in parts of Helmand Province.

"How can we allow the world to see lawful forces in charge of Marja
next to fields full of opium, which one way or another will be
harvested and turned into a poison that kills people all over the
world?" said Zulmai Afzali, the spokesman for the Afghan Ministry of
Counternarcotics.

"The Taliban are the ones who profit from opium, so you are letting
your enemy get financed by this so he can turn around and kill you
back," he added, referring to how the Taliban squeeze farmers for
money to run their operations.

The argument may strike some as a jarring reversal; in the years right
after the 2001 invasion, tensions rose as some Afghan officials
vehemently resisted all-out American pressure to stop opium production.

Though the United States government's official position is still to
support opium crop eradication in general, some American civilian
officials say that the internal debate over Marja is far from over
within parts of the State Department and the Drug Enforcement
Administration.

A spokesman for the United States Embassy in Kabul, Brendan J.
O'Brien, said officials would decline to comment while the matter was
under review.

At the heart of the debate with Afghan officials is an important
question of cause-and-effect: is poor security in Marja the reason
there is so much opium, or is so much opium the reason there has been
poor security?

"Every province in Afghanistan where you find opium cultivation, you
have insecurity as a result," Mr. Afzali said.

American military officials and United Nations drug officials see it
the other way around. Opium cultivation has been largely wiped out in
20 provinces where security has been improved, and in the seven most
insecure provinces, poppy is still farmed.

"Nothing can compete with opium in an insecure environment," Mr.
Lemahieu said. "A secure environment is the precondition for
governance and a long-term solution."

Although the International Security Assistance Force, the NATO force
that General McChrystal commands, no longer carries out eradication
programs itself, its official position is that it supports the Afghan
government's efforts to eradicate, and lends backup and protection to
the provincial officials, who are responsible for carrying out the
eradication program.

The ardently anti-opium governor of Helmand Province, Gulab Mangal,
has a record of success, cutting back cultivation by 33 percent last
year. But he, too, is willing to make an exception for the current
harvest in Marja - for the moment.

"In general I've been told by my higher-ups that this year you will
not eradicate there, because people have suffered a lot of hardships
because of the fighting," Mr. Mangal said. "We may do it next year."

Mr. Afzali, however, said the Counternarcotics Ministry still hoped to
prevail in time to eradicate the current crop in Marja.

Mr. Mangal said, "If they order me, I will start the destruction of
Marja's opium the same day."

The problem of Marja's opium harvest is being discussed intensely by
General McChrystal's advisers, but none of the proposed solutions have
proved satisfactory. One idea was to buy up and destroy the opium
harvest, but opponents of that proposal feared that it would only
encourage more opium cultivation - and might be illegal under United
States law, turning American troops into de facto drug financiers.

Another idea was to give incentives to farmers to change to legal
crops next year, while this year concentrating on interdiction of
smugglers and the laboratories they use to make opium or heroin from
the poppy paste. That would institute a sort of "don't ask, don't
tell" policy toward the cultivators and would present a thorny
question: where would troops interdict the opium - just outside the
farm gate, on the lane leading from the farm, on the road to town?

"How do you support the rule of law while providing a proper penalty
and disincentive so they switch crops next year?" Commander Eggers
said. "We are in a real dilemma."

There is little time left to find an answer: two-thirds of Marja's
fields are now blooming with tall red poppies, and the forthcoming
harvest would provide work for thousands of Afghans from outside the
area because it is so labor intensive.

Helmand produces more than half of Afghanistan's opium harvest, with
22 percent of its arable land devoted to poppies, even after Governor
Mangal's forces eradicated a third of the crop last year. His province
was awarded a $10 million Good Performer's Initiative grant by the
American Embassy for that effort.

Afghanistan now produces 90 percent of the world's opium. And one way
or another the opium trade supports an estimated 1.4 million
households in the country, which has a population of 25 million to 30
million. It also provides enormous amounts of money to the Taliban,
with a recent United Nations study estimating the insurgents had
earned as much as $600 million in taxes from farmers and traffickers
just from 2005 to 2008.

The farmers themselves do not get rich on the harvest.

Hajji Said Gul, a 51-year-old farmer with nine acres of poppies in
Marja, said that after he paid back loans to buy seeds, and gave the
Taliban their 10 percent of the profits, he earned $500 an acre with
each harvest. He is not worried about eradication. "The Taliban have
already promised us that they will keep fighting the government and
foreign forces until we collect our harvest from the fields," he said.
"All my hopes are related to the poppy harvest."

Muhammad Nabi, 52, a tribal elder, said: "It's better if they don't
destroy the crops this year. Next year, if they provide better
security, reconstruction and work programs, then we guarantee they
will not grow poppy."

Opium prices now are at historic lows, after years of over-production
in Afghanistan. A few years ago, farmers could earn 37 times as much
from opium as from wheat, the favored substitution crop recently; now
it is more like two or three times as much, United Nations officials
say.

Mr. Lemahieu said he thought that provided an opportunity to persuade
the farmers that if they changed to legal crops, the government would
provide them with services like schools and clinics, and then they
might be willing to accept lower profits.

"Between yesterday's opium income and tomorrow's legal income, today
requires an increase in quality of life for the farmer and his
family," he said. Destroy his crop this year, Western officials say,
and he won't see anything but red.