News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: L.A. Submits New Draft Ordinance on Medical Marijuana |
Title: | US CA: L.A. Submits New Draft Ordinance on Medical Marijuana |
Published On: | 2009-11-14 |
Source: | Los Angeles Times (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2009-11-15 16:27:45 |
L.A. SUBMITS NEW DRAFT ORDINANCE ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA
The Los Angeles city attorney's office on Friday submitted a new
draft medical marijuana ordinance that could resolve some contentious
issues but adds new complications, such as raising the idea of
capping the number of dispensaries by council district or community plan area.
The latest draft clarifies that edible marijuana products will be
allowed. It also removes a provision that would have required
collectives to provide lists of members, which dispensary operators
had strenuously opposed, arguing it would violate federal privacy laws.
Two City Council committees plan to meet jointly Monday to complete
the ordinance and the council is scheduled to take it up Wednesday,
more than a year and half after the first draft ordinance was sent to
the council.
David Berger, a special assistant to City Atty. Carmen Trutanich,
said the latest version, the fifth, was intended to speed the process.
"We could continue to refine this ordinance ad infinitum. It's time
to get this ordinance done," he said, noting that the city attorney's
office cannot launch actions to close dispensaries until an ordinance
is in place.
"The whole idea is to get some control over the in-your-face way that
business has been conducted up until now."
The city has hundreds of dispensaries, but a judge ruled last month
that the city's moratorium was illegally extended and barred
enforcement against a dispensary that sued, effectively leaving Los
Angeles with no regulations.
Michael Larsen, the public safety director for the Eagle Rock
Neighborhood Council, urged the council to act quickly. "Our main
objective is simply an ordinance," he said. "That's No. 1. That's the
message we want to get out."
The proposal leaves in place a prohibition on the sale of marijuana,
but it allows dispensaries to recover the "out-of-pocket costs of
their collective cultivation."
Collective operators have repeatedly criticized the provision, saying
it's unclear whether they would be able to continue to operate under
that condition.
"It's still a square peg for a round hole," said Don Duncan, the
California director for Americans for Safe Access. Duncan, who lives
in Los Angeles, said it's based on the erroneous notion that
collectives are like community gardens.
The proposed ordinance also keeps a requirement that dispensaries be
located 1,000 feet from schools, parks, libraries and other so-called
sensitive uses. City planners recently found that less than a quarter
of the 186 dispensaries the city has allowed to operate under its ban
would comply.
Duncan called the rule "unworkable," but Larsen said he believes it
is "a very liberal allowance" compared with the caps other cities
have placed on the number of dispensaries.
The Los Angeles city attorney's office on Friday submitted a new
draft medical marijuana ordinance that could resolve some contentious
issues but adds new complications, such as raising the idea of
capping the number of dispensaries by council district or community plan area.
The latest draft clarifies that edible marijuana products will be
allowed. It also removes a provision that would have required
collectives to provide lists of members, which dispensary operators
had strenuously opposed, arguing it would violate federal privacy laws.
Two City Council committees plan to meet jointly Monday to complete
the ordinance and the council is scheduled to take it up Wednesday,
more than a year and half after the first draft ordinance was sent to
the council.
David Berger, a special assistant to City Atty. Carmen Trutanich,
said the latest version, the fifth, was intended to speed the process.
"We could continue to refine this ordinance ad infinitum. It's time
to get this ordinance done," he said, noting that the city attorney's
office cannot launch actions to close dispensaries until an ordinance
is in place.
"The whole idea is to get some control over the in-your-face way that
business has been conducted up until now."
The city has hundreds of dispensaries, but a judge ruled last month
that the city's moratorium was illegally extended and barred
enforcement against a dispensary that sued, effectively leaving Los
Angeles with no regulations.
Michael Larsen, the public safety director for the Eagle Rock
Neighborhood Council, urged the council to act quickly. "Our main
objective is simply an ordinance," he said. "That's No. 1. That's the
message we want to get out."
The proposal leaves in place a prohibition on the sale of marijuana,
but it allows dispensaries to recover the "out-of-pocket costs of
their collective cultivation."
Collective operators have repeatedly criticized the provision, saying
it's unclear whether they would be able to continue to operate under
that condition.
"It's still a square peg for a round hole," said Don Duncan, the
California director for Americans for Safe Access. Duncan, who lives
in Los Angeles, said it's based on the erroneous notion that
collectives are like community gardens.
The proposed ordinance also keeps a requirement that dispensaries be
located 1,000 feet from schools, parks, libraries and other so-called
sensitive uses. City planners recently found that less than a quarter
of the 186 dispensaries the city has allowed to operate under its ban
would comply.
Duncan called the rule "unworkable," but Larsen said he believes it
is "a very liberal allowance" compared with the caps other cities
have placed on the number of dispensaries.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...