MORE JOB SEEKERS SCRAMBLE TO ERASE THEIR CRIMINAL PAST

U.S. job seekers are crashing into the worst employment market in
years and background checks that reach deeper than ever into their pasts.

The result: a surge of people seeking to legally clear their criminal records.

In Michigan, state police estimate they'll set aside 46% more
convictions this year than last. Oregon is on track to set aside 33%
more. Florida sealed and expunged nearly 15,000 criminal records in
the fiscal year ended June 30, up 43% from the previous year. The
courts of Cook County, which includes Chicago and nearby suburbs,
received about 7,600 expungement requests in the year's first three
quarters, nearly double the pace from the year before.

One petitioner is Wally Camis Jr., who wanted to clear the air about
the time he threatened two men with a hairbrush.

Mr. Camis was hungry for work amid a divorce last fall. The
41-year-old Air Force veteran, who had worked as a security guard and
owned a restaurant, filled out an application for temporary
employment in Eugene, Ore., checking a box saying he had never been arrested.

When he followed up a week later, the temp agency told him no thanks
- -- they'd turned up a 1986 conviction. Stunned, Mr. Camis recalled
the night the two men threatened him and he pulled a silver brush
from his back pocket, saying it was a knife. He called the police, he
says, and later pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly
weapon, a misdemeanor. The judge entered a "no judgment" finding and
ordered Mr. Camis to pay a $60 fine.

"I thought that was the end of it," he says.

Instead, 22 years later, Mr. Camis found himself fighting to erase
traces of the arrest, joining the growing ranks of Americans who hope
that clearing their records of minor crimes will boost their odds in
a tough job market. To help, entrepreneurs have set up
record-clearing services and local governments have passed laws to
speed the expungement process.

Civil-rights organizations have long complained that young black men
are disproportionately hindered when prospective employers ask about
applicants' arrests or convictions. But attorneys say past offenses
are increasingly catching up with blue-collar and middle-class
applicants with solid work histories.

"This is affecting a whole new group," says Michael Hornung, a
defense attorney in Fort Myers, Fla., who charges $1,000 to help
clients clear records. "I've had more people come in to talk to me
about having their records expunged in the last year than I have had
in the previous 13 combined."

The increase comes as unemployment has risen above 10%, allowing
potential employers to be choosier than they have been in decades.
More Americans have criminal records now, criminologists say, in part
because a generation has come of age since the start of the war on drugs.

These convictions are increasingly coming to employers' attention.
Background checks have become more commonplace in the years after the
Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and cheaper. More than 80% of companies
performed such checks in 2006, compared with fewer than 50% in 1998,
according to the Society for Human Resource Management, an
association of HR professionals. Erased, Sealed, Blocked

Though the definition, terminology and methods of expungement vary by
state, its general intent is to restore people to the legal status
they enjoyed before a brush with the law -- often giving them the
right to answer "no" when a prospective employer asks if they've been
arrested or convicted. Most felonies, such as sexual assault or armed
robberies, can't be removed. But in many states, some lesser crimes
can. After a successful appeal, official records may be shredded,
erased, sealed or blocked from view by anyone except entities such as
police or schools.

Expungement doesn't wipe away all traces. Local news Web sites
routinely post arrest mug shots, which are nearly impossible to
eradicate from the Internet. Search engines can turn up a smattering
of decades-old news and police reports, plus caches of newer ones.
Arrests that have been legally expunged may remain on databases that
data-harvesting companies offer to prospective employers; such
background companies are under no legal obligation to erase them.

Some employers say background checks provide vital red flags at a
time when liability fears run high. Workplace theft cost retailers
$15.5 billion last year, according to the National Retail Federation.
On-the-job violence costs billions in legal costs and lost work
hours, says the Workplace Violence Research Institute, a California
consulting firm.

"If I have a guy with four arrests and bad credit versus someone who
has never been in trouble in his life, who am I going to hire? It's
not rocket science," says Louis DeFalco, corporate director of
safety, security and investigations at ABC Fine Wine & Spirits in
Florida, which has 175 stores.

Though some employers acknowledge that workers with convictions can
become trusted employees, the risk of passing over these applicants
is far outweighed by the benefit of culling high-risk applicants from
stacks of resumes. Companies can make hiring decisions based on
conviction records, but not on arrests that haven't resulted in
convictions, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Some lawyers have created services to help clients clear records,
including Chicago attorney Tamara Holder's www.xpunged.com. Legal-aid
organizations have created or stepped up programs to help guide
people through the process. The public defender's office in San Jose,
Calif., is among public organizations using federal stimulus money to
hire additional attorneys to process the influx of clients.

State lawmakers have taken note. In Pennsylvania, where the state
pardons board faces a three-year backlog of record-clearing requests,
Democratic Rep. Tim Solobay was author of a bill permitting local
courts to process the petitions as well. It passed into law last
year. This year, Mr. Solobay is pushing legislation that would expand
the class of misdemeanors that can be expunged to include disorderly
conduct and possession of small amounts of marijuana.

Mr. Solobay says he wrote the bill after a friend told him that his
son, who was convicted of disorderly conduct in college, had been
turned down for several jobs.

"It kept coming back time and again and haunting him," Mr. Solobay
says of his friend's son, suggesting that eventually the punishment
ceased to fit the crime. "The job market is tough enough, and he's
competing against people with a clean record. So he's getting disqualified."

Millions of Americans are in a similar position. In 1967, 50% of
American men had been arrested. Since then, arrests made in
connection with domestic violence and illegal drugs have pushed the
number to 60%, estimates Alfred Blumstein, a criminologist at
Carnegie Mellon University. The annual number of arrests for
possession of marijuana more than tripled to 1.8 million from 1980 to
2007, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Arrests and convictions are also easier for employers to learn about.
Even 10 years ago, background checks tended to be cursory or
expensive. Now, database providers can quickly access information
from the country's approximately 3,100 court jurisdictions, charging
$10 or less for simple checks.

One Chicago 53-year-old, who has worked for an overnight delivery
service and as a bricklayer, is nervous that his record's sole smudge
may come back to haunt him.

In 1974, he says, he was walking down a street near his Chicago home
rolling a marijuana cigarette. He was arrested by an undercover
police officer and convicted of possession. "That was back in the
days when I had hair, and I just said, 'Forget about it.' I was like
17 or 18 years old -- what did I care?"

His employers never learned of the conviction, he says, nor have his
own children. But, hoping to coach high-school basketball when he
retires in a few years, he's working with a Chicago attorney to clear
his record. "Nowadays they look for anything so I figured I better
take care of this," he says.

One employer that has taken on candidates with criminal records in
recent years is the U.S. military. From 2006 through 2008, the four
armed-forces branches issued conduct waivers for more than 2,000
recruits with felony convictions, 3,000 recruits with felony arrests
and 42,000 recruits with serious misdemeanors, according to the
Department of Defense.

Now, some veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are finding
their service may not make up for earlier offenses.

Osvaldo Hernandez of New York served in the Army for 15 months in
Afghanistan, then, upon his return to the U.S., scored in the 98th
percentile on his civil-service exam, says his attorney, Jim Harmon.
Mr. Hernandez, 27, has been unable to land a job with the New York
City Police Department because of a 2002 conviction of illegal
possession of a gun, Mr. Harmon said.

Mr. Hernandez hasn't sought expungement because his crime doesn't
qualify for it in New York. An NYPD spokesman said the department has
a policy against hiring felons.

Mr. Hernandez is now serving another overseas tour, hoping "that
serving twice in combat will overcome the prior conviction issue,"
Mr. Harmon says.

Mr. Camis, meanwhile, spent months trying to undo the legacy of one
night in 1986.

Then 18, Mr. Camis was leaving his job at a movie theater in
Woodridge, Ill., when he says two men threatened him. He flashed the
handle of his 5-inch-long brush, he says.

The men fled. Mr. Camis says he called the police. Officers
apprehended the men, who accused Mr. Camis of being the aggressor.
Before a circuit court judge in Illinois's DuPage County, Mr. Camis
admitted he threatened to cut the men -- assault without the battery
- -- and paid his fine.

'Never Had a Problem'

The next year he joined the Air Force, where he serviced F-15s in
Okinawa, Japan, and earned an honorable discharge. He later worked as
a guard, railroad brakeman, exterminator and restaurateur, he says,
passing two criminal background checks along the way. "I never had a
problem," he said.

In fall 2008, he says, he approached Cardinal Services Inc. in
Oregon. An agent at the temp service said he had openings that might
be suitable. Mr. Camis turned in his application.

Cardinal says it paid a background-search firm about $10 to examine
his past. It turned up the DuPage no-judgment order -- which the
court had posted online in 2004, among other records.

When Mr. Camis followed up with Cardinal a week after applying, he
says, an agent there accused him of lying about his criminal history.
Cardinal wouldn't help him find work, the agent said.

Cardinal Services' manager and general counsel Mike Lehman says the
company's application asks prospective workers about arrests, as well
as convictions. Mr. Lehman called Mr. Camis's denial of his arrest a
"red flag."

"If someone has a criminal history, we can work with them," Mr.
Lehman says. "But if they have one and lie to us, that's pretty
ominous." 'No Judgment'

Mr. Camis says he had forgotten about the incident and, even when
reminded, thought the "no judgment" ruling had cleared him.

A few weeks later, he called Ms. Holder of Xpunged.com. She filed an
expungement petition with the DuPage court.

In April, Mr. Camis flew from Oregon to Illinois for a five-minute
hearing in front of a DuPage circuit judge. The judge agreed to seal
the record. Ms. Holder added that under Illinois law, Mr. Camis's
charge wasn't technically a conviction.

On Sept. 8, the records supervisor of the Woodridge Police Department
signed an affidavit swearing that she had shredded all identifying
materials connected to case 86CM4967, "People of the State of
Illinois vs. Wallace E. Camis Jr." The destroyed documents would have
included the police report with details of the arrest.

Mr. Camis is back in Illinois, taking education courses and logging
full-time hours at a day-care center where he is the cook and a
classroom helper. He says he eventually hopes to be a teacher.

Of his police record, Mr. Camis says: "Hopefully it's gone for good."