MEDICAL MARIJUANA LAW CREATES CONFUSION IN WASH.

In one corner of Washington state, a 62-year-old rheumatoid arthritis
patient could face more than eight years in prison for growing
marijuana for himself and three others. In Seattle, meanwhile, a
collection of grow operations serves 2,000 people with little
interference from police.

The discrepancy is typical of the confusion that has reigned since
voters passed Washington's medical marijuana law more than a decade
ago. Nor have things improved much since the state clarified how much
pot patients can have last year.

Unlike some states, Washington requires patients to grow marijuana
themselves or designate a caregiver to grow it for them. For many,
that's unrealistic: They're too sick to grow cannabis themselves and
don't have the thousands of dollars it can cost for a caregiver to
set up a proper growing operation.

So they've devised their own schemes, claiming to meet the letter of
the law in establishing collective grows or storefront dispensaries -
methods that are making police and prosecutors increasingly uncomfortable.

"The spirit of the law would recognize the necessity of having small
cooperative ventures," said Dan Satterberg, the prosecutor in King
County, where Seattle is. "But if they get past a certain size,
become a magnet for neighborhood violence, or you get other people
showing up to buy marijuana who are not permitted to under the law,
then there's tension."

Three years ago, Satterberg's office declined to prosecute a man who
was growing 130 plants for 40 people. But a case this year may be
testing his tolerance: He hasn't decided whether to charge a
hepatitis patient caught with 200 plants, which he claimed supplied
more than 100 other patients.

Some activists and the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington
recently began discussions with Seattle police over whether to limit
the size of cooperative grows.

In Spokane this month, police shut down a medical marijuana
dispensary - the first such bust in the state - and arrested the two
owners. They warned a half-dozen other dispensaries to close as well,
and the raid quickly drew protests from patients. The raid has set up
a high-profile court fight.

Approved by voters in 1998, it allows doctors to recommend cannabis
as a treatment for a series of debilitating or terminal conditions -
a smaller range of illnesses than California's law. A year ago, the
state issued guidelines to give police and patients alike an idea of
how much pot was OK: Up to 15 plants and 24 ounces of dried marijuana
per patient. People can have more if they demonstrate need.

Police in some jurisdictions have applied the guidelines strictly,
arresting people simply for having more than 15 plants, even if they
possessed no usable marijuana. In Seattle, Satterberg issued a memo
to law enforcement saying he wasn't interested in dragging sick
people to court. Some other counties have also adopted a lenient view.

Washington's law says that a caregiver can only provide marijuana to
one patient at any one time. In Spokane this year, medical marijuana
activists focused on that language in setting up a for-profit
dispensary called Change.

Lawyer Frank Cikutovich said the business met legal requirements: A
lone patient would enter the store, sign a document designating the
shop as his or her caregiver, and buy marijuana. The agreement
expired when the patient left and the next customer came in.

The business, raided on Sept. 10, rendered the "one patient, one
caregiver" rule meaningless, Spokane police spokeswoman Jennifer
DeRuwe said. She said there was peripheral crime associated with the
dispensary, including robberies at grow sites and street sales from
people who had purchased pot there.

"They're dispensing to hundreds and thousands of people," DeRuwe
said. "The police department's stand is, we want to get some guidance
on this. We know it's going to be up to the court system to provide
us with that."

In Western Washington, patients have instead opted for cooperatives,
Seattle medical marijuana attorney Douglas Hiatt said. Those are
closed membership groups. Patients pay dues or otherwise contribute
on a sliding financial scale for their medicine, and some people work
full time and even draw salaries under the table.

"For some people, it would be difficult to see marijuana being sold
out of storefronts in their neighborhoods," Hiatt said. "But most
Washington patients really haven't gone that way. They've wanted to
be on the down-low, and the majority of folks are not for the
California-style delivery system."

Members of one Seattle collective say it serves 2,000 patients and is
primarily supplied by about a dozen grow sites, which range from a
handful of mature plants to about 70 - a few hundred plants in all,
compared to the 30,000 that the patients would be allowed under the
15-plant guideline.

One of the grows is in the basement of a Seattle home surrounded by
blackberries and condominiums. Dozens of starter plants fill one
cramped room, while in the next a bumper crop of 15 plants is just
days from yielding around 16 pounds of pot.

Setting up the grow operation with custom-built transformers,
ventilation and lighting systems cost more than $50,000 - even though
union electricians donated their time. The marijuana is brought to a
clinic in an industrial South Seattle neighborhood for trimming and
distribution, said the HIV patient who tends the plants.