Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US WA: Joyce Man to Get Retrial in Medical Marijuana Case
Title:US WA: Joyce Man to Get Retrial in Medical Marijuana Case
Published On:2009-08-14
Source:Peninsula Daily News (WA)
Fetched On:2009-08-17 06:40:16
JOYCE MAN TO GET RETRIAL IN MEDICAL MARIJUANA CASE

In a move his attorney called precedent-setting, a medical marijuana
provider who lived near Joyce will get a new trial after the state
Court of Appeals overturned his conviction for growing marijuana and
ordered a new trial.

Earl Gordon Otis Jr., 45, was sentenced in Clallam County Superior
Court on May 1, 2008, to four months in prison for growing 75
marijuana plants at his home at 3070 Eden Valley Road.

No retrial date has been set.

The issue the appeals court addressed in its Tuesday ruling was
whether Otis could use his status as a man's medical marijuana
provider as a defense argument, according to court documents.

The argument was not allowed during the trial due to the large amount
of marijuana grown -- state law only allows a 60-day supply to be
produced -- and because the court felt a doctor's letter authorizing
the patient Otis supplied to use the drug was not sufficient, since it
didn't refer directly to state law.

The appeals court determined that the letter was sufficient and that
the amount of marijuana grown shouldn't restrict a defendant from
using the role as a provider of medical marijuana, known as a
caregiver, as a defense.

Clarifies Law

Attorneys specializing in marijuana law say the decision will affect
medical marijuana cases by clarifying a vague 10-year-old law,
especially when it comes to what a doctor needs to write in an letter
authorizing the use of the drug.

"This is a really big deal," said Otis' attorney, Jodi Backlund of
Olympia, adding that it will set a precedent.

"The state before has been really nitpicking and arguing consistently"
that a letter had to refer directly to the law."

Seattle attorney Jeff Steinborn, who has 40 years of experience in
marijuana-related cases, agreed.

"Well, it's the first time that the Court of Appeals actually read the
preamble to the medical marijuana statute and given it any meaning,"
said Steinborn, who is also a board member of the National
Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

"Individual caregivers can now be a bit more confident . . . that the
paperwork is going to work."

The trial and appeal did not address the legitimacy of the use of
marijuana for medical purposes for the man Otis was supplying.

The doctor authorized the use of marijuana to increase the man's
appetite.

Clallam County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Brian Wendt said the
prosecution may not have challenged the doctor's letter if the law had
been more clear on what needs to be written.

"We could have done it differently," he said.

Prior to the higher court's opinion, Wendt said, "The affirmed defense
did not seem appropriate or relevant."

How Much Supply

Steinborn said the state's medical marijuana law, passed by citizens
initiative in 1998, remains vague on how much marijuana is considered
a 60-day supply.

Typically, the rule of thumb is 15 plants, he said.

Otis was growing five times that amount.

If convicted again for the growing operation, he would receive credit
for the previous sentence, which he has served already.

Another marijuana law attorney, Kurt Boehl of Seattle, said it's
typical for medical marijuana users to buy the drug from growers if
they are too sick to grow it themselves.

All it takes is a letter from the user that authorizes another person
to grow it for them for such a transaction to become legal, he said.

"They don't need to notify the state," Boehl said, adding that a
provider needs to be able to provide the letter to law enforcement if
asked.

"If the state was a little more progressive thinking, they could
legalize some sort of dispensary and tax it."

Another stipulation in the law says that a provider can grow marijuana
only for one person, he said.

Otis' roommate, Leann McCarty, 42, was also convicted for the
marijuana growing operation. Her appeal is pending.
Member Comments
No member comments available...