BRECKENRIDGE WILL VOTE NOV. 3 ON MARIJUANA DECRIMINALIZATION

Council Not to Enact Initiative

BRECKENRIDGE - Breckenridge voters will decide Nov. 3 whether to
decriminalize small amounts of marijuana for adults over 21, after
town council decided Tuesday against enacting the citizens' initiative.

"I'm uncomfortable as a council member creating an ordinance that puts
us at odds with the state and federal government without the public
weighing in on it," Councilman Peter Joyce said at the meeting.

The initiative came before council after reform group Sensible
Breckenridge submitted nearly 700 valid petition signatures supporting
decriminalization. The ordinance would decriminalize possession of
less than an ounce of marijuana as well as paraphernalia.

"You've got a mandate here," Breckenridge attorney and reform group
chair Sean McAllister said, adding that the mountain region has
"probably the highest support of (marijuana decriminalization)
anywhere in the state."

In 2006, 72 percent of Breckenridge voters supported the unsuccessful
Amendment 44, which had language similar to the town initiative but
applied to the entire state.

Town manager Tim Gagen said that putting the item on a coordinated
ballot with Summit County on Nov. 3 will cost the town up to $2,000.

McAllister on Tuesday compared the marijuana initiative with another
recent petition - the mandatory "defensible space" firebreak ordinance
- - which council members repealed rather than take to the polls, citing
doubts it would stand.

The firebreak petition was certified with only 381 signatures - though
333 were needed relative to the 500 the marijuana initiative needed.

He said that the impact of possession on one's criminal record can
affect job opportunities and student loans, and that there are about
13,000 arrests per year in Colorado for simple possession.

"This is not about encouraging use," McAllister said, adding that his
stepdaughter was already exposed to it in middle school. "The current
system has already failed children."

He said his message has always been that marijuana is not the way "to
be successful in this world."

Councilman Dave Rossi on Tuesday said that "a very strong case can be
made" for decriminalization, but that it would be better if the
changes were coming from the federal or state governments.

Councilman Eric Mamula said the local issue is one of information, and
that all he's heard from is McAllister and Breckenridge Police Chief
Rick Holman, who is against the ordinance. Taking the matter to the
polls allows for more discourse before the decision.

"I have spent zero time thinking about marijuana since the day I moved
to Breckenridge," Mamula said.

Councilwoman Jen McAtamney said the ordinance would cause a "big
change" in terms of how marijuana is viewed in the community. She
added that she's considering the impact such an ordinance could have
on her children.

"I have serious concerns about the message that would be sending," she
said.

McAllister said he wasn't disappointed with council's decision, and
that there will be some campaigning to get voters to the polls this
November.

"We believe if a sufficient amount of voters get out, there's no way
we can lose this," he said.