REASON IN DRUG WAR

Gazette editorials are sometimes accused of being Utopian or
ivory-tower in nature because they push ideas critics say are
unworkable in the modern world. Sometimes that charge is true, as
these pages strive to hold government and individuals to principled
behavior, to provide a kind of touchstone to remind people of their
rights and responsibilities. One subject on which we're accused of
promoting unworkable ideas is the war on drugs.

Well-meaning people charge that drug legalization, or even
decriminalization, would lead to an explosion of drug use, and cost
millions in lost productivity. Supporters of legalization, on the
other hand, believes such a move would be a net benefit to society as
users could be kept out of the criminal justice system, lessening the
need for expensive prisons. The debate has been going on for years
with no real answers in sight. That's no longer the case.

An interview with Glenn Greenwald in the July issue of Reason magazine
reveals that such an experiment has been taking place in Portugal since
2001. Greenwald has penned a policy study for the Cato Institute, "Drug
Decriminalization in Portugal: Lessons for Creating Fair and Successful
Policies."

In the Reason interview, Greenwald notes Portugal's decriminalization
of personal amounts of all drugs has resulted in lower rates of drug
use, while saving the nation the "huge amount of money that had gone
into putting its citizens in cages." Officials then used that savings
to fund improved treatment programs that are more effective in helping
people kick their habits.

Decriminalization, says Greenwald, turns possession of small amounts
of drugs into a social issues rather than a crime problem. That
removes the adversarial relationship between users and government,
allowing addicts to seek treatment without fear of incarceration. That
treatment is often successful, turning addicts into non-users, hence
the lower rates of drug use.

Is such a thing possible in the United States? The interview's final
exchange provides the answer.

"Q: What's the relevance for the United States?

"A: We have debates all the time now about things like drug policy
reform and decriminalization, and it's based purely in speculation and
fear-mongering of all the horrible things that are supposedly going to
happen if we loosen our drug laws. We can remove ourselves from the
realm of the speculative by looking at Portugal, which actually
decriminalized seven years ago, in full, [use and possession of] every
drug. And see that none of that parade of horribles that's constantly
warned of by decriminalization opponents actually came to fruition.
Lisbon didn't turn into a drug haven for drug tourists. The explosion
in drug usage rates that was predicted never materialized. In fact,
the opposite happened."

If the U.S. were to take the small step of decriminalizing small
amount of drugs, it wouldn't be setting the trend in the Western
Hemisphere. During the media frenzy surrounding the swine flu outbreak
earlier this year, Mexican lawmakers quietly passed a law
decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana and other
drugs. The bill awaits the signature of Mexican President Felipe Calderone.

Like Portugal, Mexico intends to treat drug use outside the criminal
justice system. The secretary general of Mexico's National Institute
of Penal Services said it best: "The important thing is ... that
consumers are not treated as criminals. It is a public health problem,
not a penal problem."

Past efforts in Mexico for decriminalization have resulted in pressure
from the U.S., who relies on Mexico being a key ally to help fight the
drug war. That pressure has doomed those efforts, but that doesn't
seem to be happening this time.

So far, the Obama administration has been publicly silent on the law,
but a comment from the acting director of the Drug Enforcement
Administration offers a clue to the administration's position. At an
April news conference, Michele Leonhart said that legalization of
drugs "would be a failed law enforcement strategy for both the U.S.
and Mexico." As opposed, we suppose, to the rousing success of four
decades of the war on drugs.

If U.S. officials won't budge on a policy demonstrated to not be
working, the least they can do is allow our neighbors to do what they
think is best for their own people.