News (Media Awareness Project) - US MI: Ambiguity in New Marijuana Law Is Cited |
Title: | US MI: Ambiguity in New Marijuana Law Is Cited |
Published On: | 2009-06-18 |
Source: | Detroit Free Press (MI) |
Fetched On: | 2009-06-18 16:29:38 |
AMBIGUITY IN NEW MARIJUANA LAW IS CITED
A district court judge dismissed felony drug charges Wednesday
against a Madison Heights couple embroiled in one of the first major
tests of the state's medical marijuana law.
Calling it "one of the worst pieces of legislation I've ever seen in
my life," 43rd District Judge Robert J. Turner criticized multiple
ambiguities in the voter-initiated law, including how much marijuana
a supposed medical user could possess and still be free from
prosecution. Under the law, there are several scenarios in which a
person can be in valid possession of a various amount of marijuana.
"Every judge in the state of Michigan will have to determine what a
reasonable amount is," he said.
It's one of many fears state health officials have voiced in
administering the law, which was enacted Dec. 4, 2008. It wasn't
until four months later that a registration program was started.
The Madison Heights case explored one problem -- was the required
doctor's letter enough proof of legal marijuana use when a
registration program had not yet begun?
On March 30, three weeks after getting recommendation letters from
Dr. Eric Eisenbud of the Hemp and Cannabis Foundation Medical Clinic
in Southfield, but five days before they could apply for state ID
cards, Madison Heights police stormed the home of Robert Redden, 59,
and Torey Clark, 47. Police seized 21 small marijuana plants and money.
The two were individually charged with felonies for intent to
manufacture marijuana. Each faced up to 14 years in prison, since
they had prior drug offenses, and up to $1 million each in fines.
The couple and their lawyers argued the letters were sufficient for
legal use of marijuana for Redden's hip pain and Clark's cancer nausea.
Police and the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office disagreed.
Prosecutor Beth Hand also questioned how often patients needed to see
a doctor to renew registration.
After the dismissal, Eisenbud said the issue of determining a
reasonable amount of medicinal marijuana would be resolved if the
state regulated growth and distribution of uniform medical-grade marijuana.
A district court judge dismissed felony drug charges Wednesday
against a Madison Heights couple embroiled in one of the first major
tests of the state's medical marijuana law.
Calling it "one of the worst pieces of legislation I've ever seen in
my life," 43rd District Judge Robert J. Turner criticized multiple
ambiguities in the voter-initiated law, including how much marijuana
a supposed medical user could possess and still be free from
prosecution. Under the law, there are several scenarios in which a
person can be in valid possession of a various amount of marijuana.
"Every judge in the state of Michigan will have to determine what a
reasonable amount is," he said.
It's one of many fears state health officials have voiced in
administering the law, which was enacted Dec. 4, 2008. It wasn't
until four months later that a registration program was started.
The Madison Heights case explored one problem -- was the required
doctor's letter enough proof of legal marijuana use when a
registration program had not yet begun?
On March 30, three weeks after getting recommendation letters from
Dr. Eric Eisenbud of the Hemp and Cannabis Foundation Medical Clinic
in Southfield, but five days before they could apply for state ID
cards, Madison Heights police stormed the home of Robert Redden, 59,
and Torey Clark, 47. Police seized 21 small marijuana plants and money.
The two were individually charged with felonies for intent to
manufacture marijuana. Each faced up to 14 years in prison, since
they had prior drug offenses, and up to $1 million each in fines.
The couple and their lawyers argued the letters were sufficient for
legal use of marijuana for Redden's hip pain and Clark's cancer nausea.
Police and the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office disagreed.
Prosecutor Beth Hand also questioned how often patients needed to see
a doctor to renew registration.
After the dismissal, Eisenbud said the issue of determining a
reasonable amount of medicinal marijuana would be resolved if the
state regulated growth and distribution of uniform medical-grade marijuana.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...